Monitor costs over $20,000 brand new

>monitor costs over $20,000 brand new
>looks like a piece of shit from 2003
why do they do this? why do these super-monitors look so shitty?

Attached: referencemonitor.jpg (500x500, 19K)

So that you don't need a $1k stand and it's still stable

They cost so much because they generally have much higher quality components that are capable of delivering performance at very tight tolerances.

This takes up space, and they're not being sold to sit in your living room, they're sold to be used in dark editing rooms for movie production and similar. Aesthetics don't mean a thing.

for the same reason most servers dont have RGB, its a serious product not some meme gaymer monitor

>spend $20G to save $999
Just try and tell me the new Apple monitor isn't a good deal. You can't because there's no comparable monitors even within the $10,000 range.

No one is arguing the mac pro isn't good for people making amateur YouTube videos and such. Maybe some epic gaymer videos too. It's just not good for big boy work.

Based

Reference monitors are used by production studios/news networks to see if enhancements are as accurate as possible for airing.
Not a workstation monitor for soundcloud rappers/youtube video creators.

Purpose built for an industry
>reference tv
>guaranteed color accuracy
>industrial specifications
>industry specific i/o
>warranty, and service
That tv isn't meant for consumers.

This, it's gaymer repellent.