Why the fuck is this fucking shit "webp" a thing...

Why the fuck is this fucking shit "webp" a thing? It fucking infuriates me when I download images from Google image search for shitposting purposes, and I keep seeing this god damn motherfucking icon. Who gains from this shitty piece of shit format?

Attached: Untitled.png (314x89, 9K)

google gains more control over the software ecosystem

Attached: 13f.gif (498x594, 113K)

It's pretty good at compression though I don't know if everything needs to be in that format. I don't remember if its a irfanview plugin or icaros that does it for me, but you can make that show a thumbnail too.

I couldn't care less about seeing the thumbnail. Actually it's better when it shows a thumbnail of that sort so I'll see immediately that it's not in a format I can use without editing it.

Just don't use Google, user.

filtered

>save image on mobile
>it's webp
>already closed the tab on jewgle images
>in the end never post that thread

They can easily be made to phone home so if you download a naughty pic and open it up you get vanned

if you use firefox you can modify your accept headers from
webp,*/*
to just
*/*
and disable webp support in about:config altogether

Are you Jow Forums enough to do these 2 changes yourself?

Attached: fox.jpg (900x600, 95K)

>How dare someone make a better format!
What's the point of this thread?

>Who gains from this shitty piece of shit format?
Everyone, once it gets better support.

Do you have a source for that? I'm pretty sure they're just vp9 i-frames.

Sorry, VP8 i-frames.

it's just a single video frame as you say, don't listen to nu-Jow Forums users, half of them are Jow Forums users

I don't want to hinder the usability of a web page by disabling images shown.

You do realize an automatic fallback to jpg will occur?

Does the word fallback overwhelm you zoomer?

Yes

Then why are you on Jow Forums if you cannot use technology advice?

To talk about video games and politics and stuff.

>t.

Attached: 46d.png (692x390, 200K)

Webp is objectively the the efficient image format today.

Speaking of webp, I'm having an issue where in both the windows image viewer on win10 and Irfanview I'm getting a draker red version of the image, but when I go full screen with it, it's all normal. The thumbnails are normal too, they're just fucked whenever I'm not in full screen.
Tried reinstallnig the webp plugin several times with several different versions, it's all the same. My GPU driver is the latest too.

YUP, REAL PLAYER AND QUICKTIME, THEY DON'T MAKE ONLINE VIDEO FORMATS LIKE THAT ANYMORE

works for me

BASED

Then don't use google image search. I swear to god you people are as dumb as they come.

this
chrome is the new IE (being able to force non-standard solutions on the internet), but nobody seems to care
i wish i didnt live on this planet of fucktards

KEK

>chrome is the new IE (being able to force non-standard solutions on the internet)
True, but what does that have to do with WebP?

It fucking sucks

>WebM
>WebP

This is enough to understand why.

Not really.

how about you uninstall irfanview?

Then you're out of luck.

it autofalls back you fucking retard, leave this board.

stop using google
stop using chrome
stop using google images
stop using windows
fucking retard

same. they're throttling our free speech. this is unconstitutional

Use Icaros, SageThumbs, or Media Preview you god damn moron

Everyone, because WebP is much smaller for the same quality, so you spend less data and time downloading images on the web.

It’s a bad shitty anti piracy format I hate it

not even him but you're dumb

Expected to be spoonfed?
Tough luck.

See pic related.

Attached: standards.png (500x283, 24K)

protip: just make a webp inside a webm. Jow Forums is too scared to BTFO all the iToddlers to officially switch over to webp and ban PNG/JPG/GIF.

Script related:

LOONIX

mkdir out
for f in *.{png,jpg}; do ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "$f" -filter:v hqdn3d=5.0:5.0:0.0:0.0 -g 1 -c:v libvpx -deadline good -cpu-used 0 -qmin 22 -qmax 22 -t 1 -r 1 "out/${f%.*}.webm"; done

WANKBLOWS

for %%f IN (*.png, *.jpg) do (
ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "%%f" -filter:v hqdn3d=5.0:5.0:0.0:0.0 -g 1 -c:v libvpx -deadline good -cpu-used 0 -qmin 22 -qmax 22 -t 1 -r 1 "%%~nf.webm"
)

Go forth and make all the iToddlers SEETHE

Attached: FB_IMG_1560347902267.jpg (600x350, 18K)

>71454938
Every aspect of this post is utterly disgusting. Never reply to me again.

based

seethe harder iToddler macfaggot mactoddler macard iTard

Attached: 1556051975534.png (313x291, 134K)

Fuck webp, fuck webm, and FUCK Google. Use FLIF

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
B-BUT
MUH $2000 PHONE

>Use FLIF
I do, but WebP also has its advantages. It's faster to en-/decode, has more support, the codecs are in general more mature and the development hasn't stagnated yet.

>WEBM GOOD

>WEBP BAD

Attached: iu[1].jpg (474x266, 11K)