Why aren't you running the latest kernel?

Attached: scrot.png (520x178, 26K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pastebin.com/LecA2KAF
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

user, I am running 1903.

What's that

Because I live on the absolute trailing age of enterprise boomertech.
For me, it's 2.6.* kernel and gcc 4.8.5 (if I'm lucky).

tell me more about it

Attached: Screenshot-QEMU.png (734x414, 12K)

But why

Alpha af.

>2 day old kernel
yikes

I'm running it though.
OpenBSD 6.5 GENERIC.MP#39 amd64

Pfffft.

I only run kernel releases not rcs

RC stands for Ready to Compile

because mine just werks

This

Closed source enterprise shit that only runs on RHEL 5. We installed that shit in 2019.

oh and i don't care about the kernel that much it's the userland that kills me.

Latest kernels fuck with my wireless drivers.

4.0.9 works just fine

enjoy your CVEs

The rc stands for "release candidate"

Attached: 1506879657890.gif (480x214, 483K)

winblows 10

:^)

I'm on old hardware and every time a new Kernel updates come my system crashes. So I'm cool with 4.19

I don't feel like rebooting more than twice in a month

My 12 y/o laptop is running 5.1.10 with no issues

>unironically running rcs for not testing
It's like you want data corruption to happen

Good for you

>not running 4.14.88 kernel

Attached: ourlinux.jpg (1920x1080, 110K)

that shit doesn't even have the mitigation patches for spectre and meltdown...

It does retroactively. 5.2 has a nice kernel command mitigations=off or mitigation=off which turns that bullshit OFF for good.

I thought 4.14 was the oldest kernel with patches

Post .config files

pastebin.com/LecA2KAF
rate

mainline: 5.2-rc5 2019-06-16 [tarball] [patch] [inc. patch] [view diff] [browse]
stable: 5.1.11 2019-06-17 [tarball] [pgp] [patch] [inc. patch] [view diff] [browse] [changelog]
stable: 5.0.21 [EOL] 2019-06-04 [tarball] [pgp] [patch] [inc. patch] [view diff] [browse] [changelog]
longterm: 4.19.52 2019-06-17 [tarball] [pgp] [patch] [inc. patch] [view diff] [browse] [changelog]
longterm: 4.14.127 2019-06-17 [tarball] [pgp] [patch] [inc. patch] [view diff] [browse] [changelog]
longterm: 4.9.182 2019-06-17 [tarball] [pgp] [patch] [inc. patch] [view diff] [browse] [changelog]
longterm: 4.4.182 2019-06-17 [tarball] [pgp] [patch] [inc. patch] [view diff] [browse] [changelog]
longterm: 3.16.68 2019-05-22 [tarball] [pgp] [patch] [inc. patch] [view diff] [browse] [changelog]
linux-next: next-20190618 2019-06-18 [browse]


Linus maintains LTS kernels.

because I don't want to do beta testing
5.1.11 is latest for me

I'm on 4.14.124-1, what do I serve to gain from switching to a newer one?

That and some code improvements. Really just get liquorix, it's linux configured for desktops. Or you could compile yourself with
It's my blend - for any x86-64 machine with an SSD and good cooling. Low latency, smooth.

It's a lot faster bro, and there's new logitech support as well!