Based google

theguardian.com/technology/2019/jun/19/google-alphabet-shareholder-meeting-protest-sexual-harassment

Attached: FEC80875-CBD6-45F6-B928-33544E357F59.jpg (1266x1368, 994K)

>google employees stage walkout
>literally no google services go offline or experience disruptions
>none
What the fuck do these people even do all day to justify their salaries?
Google could probably fire 90% of their workforce and nobody would notice.

devise more ways to piss off literally everyone

Managing to piss off "Liberals" and the alt-right simultaneously has been fairly impressive to me.

Until they fire all the degenerates working for them simply for the reason of being degenerates they will never be based.

>What the fuck do these people even do all day to justify their salaries?
Google hires them, so no one else could.

i dont think many anons understand how 'diversity hires' work. its pretty rare for them to actually be placed into positions of importance or power. most will do bullshit nonsense like update internal wikipages, draw those gay doodles, create internal webapps that never get productised or whatever

the point of them is so google can say, x% of our workforce is black, y% is hispanic, etc. etc. its pre-emptive armour if anyone claims they are racist. now that kubernetes runs their platform they could trim their staff down by a huge percentage in theory, but how would that play? 'google fires 80% of its ethnic staff' would be the headline

same with companies they buy, hog the patents even if you don't need them, just so others can't buy them

>based botnet
>some shit Jow Forums carres sbout
Fuck off

Meanwhile Youtube still censors free speech.

>HR department stages a walkout
>0% impact to company as a whole

God I hate first worlders

On the surface, it's funny as fuck that they've trolled all the idpol morons across the board.

But it's irrelevant compared to the real issue which is that they spy on everything on the internet.

this is true, but the world cares more about what Donald Trump's scrotum smells like than anything that actually matters

>doesn't dig into the contents of the 13 proposals
>instead talks about a crowd of protesters
>wastes space on a single quote from one protester
>finishes off the article with ads for Google's new products

Modern journalism, really getting to the heart of the issues.

What's up with women who don't like compliments? Are they mentally ill? Asexual? Chronic masturbators?

Attached: 1556620726655.jpg (356x750, 172K)

gee. and here i thought they had become perma-pozzed.

Women have a very hard time mentally separating "what this person said was bad" vs "I dont like this person so everything they could ever do is bad"
Its comical and they lose their shit if you point it out.
Compliments are only compliments if they like you.

really makes you think

They don't want actual autists making sexual comments to them at work. Especially because Google is mostly men.

Compliments arent necessarily sexual comments

>90% Less passive aggressive nagging
>30% Less meetings
>At least 30% higher productivity
>0% Impact
Come on now user. There is an impact, but it'd be positive. At worst, the company summer party gets delayed by a week.

>At worst, the company summer party gets delayed by a week.
Fuck that shit the corporate parties were the best part about working at Google.

I mean, calling red lipstick sexy can be sleazy, but IDK if it's harassment unless he says "I'd like to see it on my dick"

Were they protesting non-sexual comments? The sign in the image mentions sexual stuff explicitly.

Which is the entire reason he was even elected. The media went atomically, ballistically unhinged at every mere whisper of his name, knowing his voting bloc generally distrusts the media.

Makes sense though. They don't want to experience sleazy things, so they protested. Google decided that they weren't bad enough to create a policy about.

Yeah the funny thing is CNN is not anti-Trump. They like to complain about Trump because it brings in the ratings. Note that they were happy enough to jump to his defense as soon as it looked like he'd go to war, because war is fantastic for ratings. Some of the reporters may have their own political opinions, but as a network it doesn't give a shit.

I have to pretend to be a tranny but I'd say that the best part of working there is my 220k salary + stock options

Sweet, looks like Google has a bunch of open positions now. I'd gladly work for the botnet for $100k/yr

The Seattle Google Christmas party was fuckin lit. Open bar and open mic karaoke mixed with 23 year old recent grads and 40 year old ex ms employees.

>Google in 2000s: " Let's hire these pajeets and neckbeards, they sure know how to computer!"
>Google in 2010: "Let's hire some girls!"
>Google now: : "Ah shit!"

Nah it was mostly generic office workers like most other companies. The benefits were very comfy. The work was draining and boring and they put our team on some weird ladder so nobody could switch to other roles or teams (although I hear from some friends that they finally merged a bunch of the parallel ladders into one).

Why the fuck are men at the protest? Do these men not have a fatherly figure to teach them the pride of being a man? What the fuck.

Yeah same with my satellite office, they had karaoke and booze at every Christmas party and every summer party. I don't miss the corporate life except for the free parties.

The dude in front probably just wants equal pay. Google "positively discriminates" men by paying them less.

my daddy taught us not to be ashamed of our dicks

>read article
>some asspie temp worker thinks he should have the same value as engineers
>lol heartily

>the pride of being a man means not protesting for political causes

This.

Say you run a website hosted on firebase and you decide to go and protest... Do you expect your website to stop working?

War is good for the defense contractors who own the media

That is because you look at thing from a "left vs right" perspective while you need to look at it from "liberty vs authoritarian" perspective. Liberals get fucked by censorship too, although right now it is the right being mainly censored. There are topics like " war in Iran" where both the right and the left are against any sort of conflict, but it is statists and (((neo conservatives in the government ))) that are pro-conflict.

"If i virtue signal enough Stacy will fuck me :) "

when your political cause siphons your masculine energy into non-masculine causes yes it is. fuck like i'm gonna slave day in and day out for a basket weaving class at a liberal arts university. maybe you would but thats why i have sex and you don't

Workers rights is masculine, regardless of whose rights.

workers should be treated according to their value.

And acting collectively can help increase workers' value.

no it only increases their leverage.
I"m not talking value in terms of position but in terms of actually making the contributions said position requires.
being a meritocracy is the only way for a company to survive and profit legitimately

(((google))) doesn't want diversity, I wonder why...

Kind of surprised some triggered tranny janny hasn't deleted this thread yet.

Whats with the closed hand nazi salute?

Are you implying that Jow Forums actually has moderation?

There is only one solution.

Attached: nuke california.jpg (710x1024, 62K)

By the looks of the article, people are using the protest as an excuse to push their personal micro-demands.
This should result in proposals that are a hodgepodge of different demands, in the same vein as a pork-loaded bill meeting Congress.

Sane people would realize that because these proposals are so schizophrenic and unfocused that their implementation would be retarded at worst and counterproductive at best

Sure but companies will act collectively against workers with anti poaching agreements and such, and pay as little as they can get away with. Employees need to work together to protect their worth.

>posters
>protesting
>diversity
I want an outwardly oppressive Google with teeth.

but that's what we have right now
It's just that those teeth are pointed in the wrong direction

"The square root of the number of people in a domain do 50% of the work". Meaning 314 people at google (out of 98,771) does 50% of the work.

The left IS authoritarian though.

modern left - sure. Old left - eh no.
But the old left got so corrupted that it now is a joke.

Based Google concentrating the garbage in their campus so there is less of it for other companies to sift through.

>now that kubernetes runs their platform they could trim their staff down by a huge percentage in theory

Nah son. And they use borg internally anyway

Google engineers are just that good. Plus the pager dudes in charge of responding to outages tend to be more Jow Forums and less Reddit than the rest.

That’s what good SRE and resilience engineering does

based Google, but now stop watching my porn history

jesus christ, imagine working next to these people.
i would burn myself alive before i ever voluntarily associated with people lilke that. the lipstick woman is absolutely desperate to impose her own sexual malfunction and neuroticism onto the rest of society. sexuality is a normal, natural, healthy, and fun part of life, and because she is trying to ruin that for everyone around her and all of civilization. she is fucking evil yet via her unexamined emotional fucked up female morality she thinks she is the good guy.

its amazing.

Attached: b9votga8j4531.jpg (1600x1198, 220K)

>Red badge
Not even a real Googler, that's a contractor. Probably works as a receptionist.