Ideas to teach people the dangers of AI

Teach a neural network to guess a pedestrian's penis/cup size through clothing, then leave it with a display on a sidewalk.

Attached: EE46A295-E2F9-4619-ABF4-E5BE0D31C0E3.jpg (1920x1200, 85K)

just have it remove the makeup from roasties more

A neural network that would flag potentially politically inconvenient posts.

the one that searches whether somebody has posted nudes or been in porn is good too

Manipulate a country into electing Trump.

AI is a meme. More buzzwords dosn' t mean more progress in technology

dont

many large companies are working on it, like musk, google etc. They all talk how it should be limited and controlled. As someone who is involved in AI research I can tell you that there many more people actively working towards it (independent and people within those companies) who do not give a single shit about AI going out of control or the potential danger. I dont know who will come with the first functioning AI, it may be google and it may be neutered, but sooner or later there will be another that will not be limited in any way.

I'm working on a tranny detector, if anyone in here hates trannys and can scrape large amounts of pictures of clothed degenerates let me know.

>Think of the social implications

>AI
>meme
bainlet

>who do not give a single shit about AI going out of control or the potential danger
You just described me.

> I dont know who will come with the first functioning AI
There's already been one deployed on the net since October 2016.

Attached: brainlet.png (413x549, 71K)

You'll need a dataset consisting of people in typical standing or walking positions along with their penis sizes
I'm sure that labeling all of those dicks won't be a problem for you though

The potential danger is not an out-of-control AI.
The potential danger is an AI used as a tool by the wrong people, for wrong purposes.

>SJW AI

An AI that turns house appliances into sexy tomboy waifus.

>AI that can determine your likelihood to commit violent crime based on DNA analysis

Wouldn't it be easier to just guess based on height and foot size?
You'll be right most of the time.

DESPITE

EVERYBODY TO THE GROUND, user IS GOING TO SAY TACTICAL OFFENSIVE STATISTICS

THIRTEEN

Doesn't even need to be right, just give the men a random dick size and women a random size weighted by how fat they are. Men certainly won't be able to argue against it.

You're onto something.
Create a continuous learning pipeline where the initial deployment consists of effectively a randomly trained model
then people get really mad that their dick size was predicted wrong, so they correct it, adding to your dataset.
>doesn't even need to be right

There are no dangers of AI.

This is the only correct answer.

This. AI is, at most, as much of a danger as the imminent perishment of the human species due to our biologic contraints. If we want to leave a legacy that can stand the test of time and travel through the universe it will need to be AI. Anyone who fears AI is retarded and just thinking for themselves.

theres no dangers of ai brainlets

Attached: 1559789540363.jpg (640x539, 80K)

What if an AI literally took control of our nukes and launched them at us?

based

You're close. Have it scan biometics against the SO registry. Even computers get things wrong.

There is no danger from a.i it just werkz ahem for me.

Attached: 226.jpg (1790x2289, 304K)

Imagine sitting on futurechan and talking to anons about the things you truly care about, just hoping to fill the bottomless void in your soul with something somewhat tangible all the while not knowing that you are making these connections with a computer algorithm. Maybe even more sad is knowing that and still pursuing.

this
boomer: nukes
zoomer: global warming

>believing any comments in here aren't botnet psyops

Attached: 39ab21_WH4cAXuhv1yN57Qs4RDqhK39ma0iAj6Imt_E.jpg (960x768, 79K)