Tick tock amdrones

'''''7'''''' nm according to chinks

Attached: tsmc-density-with-7nm.png (1200x885, 177K)

>A0 steeping
>it CAN BOOT LOONIX

imagine how shitty this is that the big news about it is that it boots an OS

>intel 10nm
>in the mid 2019
I have a bad news for you

>2019
>bragging about 10nm
big yikes

Attached: patriot-pepe.jpg (1696x2048, 424K)

Please take a look

Attached: 2019-Intel-Investor-Meeting-Shenoy-14.png (4000x2250, 2.94M)

>intel (actual)
>(actual)
so where can I buy it?

>IT BOOTS
>WE DID IT INTEL BROS
Top of the keks to you faggots.

Attached: PFFFF.jpg (599x449, 38K)

>2019
>still trusting Intel

You can tell from the responses in this thread that it has AMD shills running scared.

Poster above me is seething hard.

I hope intel makes a comeback otherwise AMD will just become the new intel

And I'm not even a AMD drone.

AMD never used business tactics like Intel even when they were in the lead previously.
AMD never cheaped out on security even though they needed the performance boost from it more than Intel.

Attached: file.png (1154x523, 114K)

it will have thermals per mm similar to two space shuttles entering atmosphere

?

What the hell are these 24core low supply shit heaps going to do? There's no ice lake AP on the horizon so Intel can't even claim mcm shenanigans for performance halos.

It melted his hand didn't it?

0.86GHz all (2) core, 800w

Hey RETARD - If you have two space shuttles, you're doubling both the thermal generation and the surface area too, dipshit.

It's exactly the same thermals per mm2 as with one shuttle. AMD drones, people...

>billion dollar company
>not making a comeback
(lol

if Intel doesn't come back AMD gets torn to shreds and vice-versa.

This is merely a temporary phase where AMD will be on the top before getting axed by Intel.

Happens once every decade and faggots still don't learn.

>AMD never used business tactics like Intel even when they were in the lead previously.
Tech Jesus says no

youtube.com/watch?v=jzaXvEPyKd0

All the seething AMD fanboys in the comments section

I only see fairly reasonable criticisms being leveled though

>ss
no nazis in the computers
no nazis anywhere

>almost 30 minutes of shilling
is there a readable version of this somewhere

>intel gone down 15% in density from 14nm to 14nm++
What did they mean by this?

when i pull the lid off, will you die?

it would be extremely antisemitic

ACTUAL 10nm Intel doesn't exist as a consumer product.

yes it does

tick tock refresh refresh refresh refresh tick refresh refresh refresh refresh tock*

>30min damage control video by Intel's outsourced marketing team
OH NO NO NO NO NO

Attached: Reichdeon.png (1200x798, 1.07M)

on laptops with just 1.3ghz?

>compiler sabotage incoming
like the good old days

yes and some months ago in some chinkpad as a dual-core

quit it with your autistic gpu & cpu wars and go back to /v/

that is a xeon engineering sample
why would /v/ have prosumer brand-wars?

yeah cuz nothing says prosumer like shouting amdrone

everybody has to cope sometimes

Are you kidding, you're comparing THAT to what Intel has done?
I've seen it, it's misleading, not fake. Like Intel benchmarks, i.e. disabling SMT and boost on AMD CPUs when comparing.

While AMD does this:
reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/bz73k0/ryzen_3000_gaming_comparisons_with_intel/
They don't even produce the worse case scenario for Intel.

Is that updated chart? Intel had to officially downscale its 10nm to actually being able to implement it about year ago.

>when you try to find something bad AMD has done marketing wise but the best you can come up with is slightly misleading
TOP KEK

Silly OP, Tick-tock has been dead for years, Intel started using the three-stage Process-Architecture-Optimization model in 2016.

>3nm behind
>1kw tpd
>Xbox hueg
>performance may not reflect all publicly available security patches
Ebin

>Tech Jesus
More like tech faggot.

not even slated for release next year
THEY STILL PUMPING OUT 14NM+++++
AHAHAHAHA

>no source
Found the Incel.

Let's be honest here, if this was true, Intel would be calling AMD out on false marketing. But they can't.

Attached: +_818ffbcdd5781f636f99b25faae3e6ba.jpg (788x739, 101K)

fpbp

>cherry picked use case for marketing purposes
vs
>literally international crime

>non-standardized lithography nomenclature is now subject to false marketing lawsuits
I disagree.

>unmarked knights landing package shown to press
>not a single benchmark
GUY ITS 10NM , TRUST US
its like amd grabbing an unmarked Threadripper/Epyc proc from the production lines and saying that its 5nm

Attached: 1558467468309.png (787x520, 482K)

They didnt show the die because its not actually 10nm under that ihs, literally what is the fucking point of showing a covered unlabeled package?

[*side channel attacks intensify*]

they would just buy amd and not have to worry about over priced security risk cpus

This is bullshit
ICX xeons are always bga
And there's been a shortage for weeks now
That's a skylake or Cascade lake package
Icx hasn't even reached alpha exit stage yet jesus

Then Intel would be 3nm right now if AMD is 7nm.

SHUT
IT
DOWN

Attached: 1548678478608.png (1070x601, 816K)

Way to out yourself as a legitimate intel shill you dumb Indian shitskin. Anyone who has been here more than 72 hours knows all types of shills are here.

Attached: 1553271140277.jpg (508x590, 59K)

>tick tick tick tick tock
FTFY

>glued togeher 48 core xeon

So it's
> MORE expensive hotter slower worse value has no release date production hasn't ramped up and intcel has nothing on their road map till 2020
Yawn I'll give a fuck in 2 years when Zen 4k comes out and watch them get crushed

>here you go got, buy our $3,000 processor to beat a $1,000 processor by 0.15%

>GETS 6 FPS MORE IN CS GO
>AMD BTFO

Its very hard to call anyone on that which is why it rarely happens even in this age where marketing approaches outright lies

Both AMDs test and GN's response was retarded, like none of them understand ffmpeg basics. There's no visual difference between ultrafast and slow unless it's bitrate restrained. Testing at 4mbit/s would have meant something

>engineering sample

talk to me when intel can release non-engineering samples.

Oh Yes, an user of culture
K6-2 et Athlon64 send their regards

If I were getting paid as a sysadmin to upgrade server hardware, you bet your ass I wouldn't be choosing Intel except at gunpoint. Who gives a fuck how well it performs when there are vulnerabilities out the ass to worry about? I'm sure Zhang would be delighted to know the company's servers are filled with swiss cheese CPUs.

Who are they kidding?

Attached: 1558483360009.jpg (336x440, 35K)

F

>You will never compute with Hitler
Why even live?

Attached: 1559765934682.jpg (640x480, 47K)

>Intel release cycle
Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, BOOM!

Yes, and? That is probably going to go against Milan. Protip: even if it's just efficiency gains, Milan will beat any Intel offering. Imagine if rumors pointing to more threads, possible vertical stacking, and even 6 core CCXs come to fruition? They're dead, we are going to see a counter attack at 2023 for sure; Intel has too much money to simply disappear and they still have the laptop/mobile market on check.

>Intel has the mobile market
wtf am I reading?

>now
More like in 2021 when they can actually produce these

'cause it's fact

OV VEY THIS IS ANTI-SEMETIC

Attached: 1560817230945.jpg (500x564, 22K)

neat image

Attached: 1554716297740.jpg (800x513, 66K)

Every AMD laptop is some POS with a 768p screen

>tick tock
you mean process, architecture, optimization

Attached: Tech.png (1811x533, 903K)

ellen pao

deled
$ neofetch cpu resolution

cpu: AMD A9-9420 RADEON R5 2C+3G (2) @ 3.0GHz [37.5°C]
resolution: 1366x768 @ 59.80Hz

You mean process, architecture, optimization, architecture, architecture, optimization, optimization, optimization, optimization, optimization

>available in 2021
>competing against AMD's 5nm

SIGH

Attached: Untitled.png (3908x532, 649K)

>Tech Jesus

Attached: ff.jpg (575x651, 168K)

I mean if the CPU can handle it you'd want the slowest preset you're comfortable with.

If it can undeniably handle slow in the test while the 9900K can't, how is it misleading?
GN's trying to spin it to be "the 9900K is fine for streaming as long as you don't use slow similar to how AMD demonstrated".

They say its misleading then the very next episode will have some CPU being tested with a 2080ti on 1080p low settings.

It's not misleading at all. If I have two trucks and one can tow 9k lbs and the other 11k lbs and I show them pulling that weight next to each other with one succeeding and the other failing how is that misleading? Is it misleading because most people have no need to tow 11k lbs? Of course not.

Steve is arrogant and got shown up, and instead of acknowledging his error he doubled down and ended up looking even more retarded.

Attached: ff.png (593x739, 710K)

sLoWiSnTuSeDiNtHeReAlWoRlD*
*will be used in the real world once Intel can handle it

>lawsuits
Yeah that's the only measure a company has.
Think for a second.