Start SJW shitshow

>donations stop coming
didn't find any of the yearly/quarterly donation reports listing any sums
source?

Yeah, man.

Lol at the SJWIDF in here.

It’s obvious they’ve lost all their long time donators like me and that the project is in free fall.

Stay mad libtards.

Which was the project that instead of writing a CoC as the SJWs demanded, they wrote another code and completely BTFO of them? The Linux kernel or something else?

>It’s obvious
Yet nobody has provided any sources.

A nerve on my dick, gayboi

You do realize that the Linux kernel has a similar CoC, right?

sqlite.org/codeofethics.html

>people in here are still seething over projects stating that it's not OK to mistreat and insult other members of the project

Attached: 1555958989992.png (394x370, 195K)

this is Jow Forums, pussy bitch nigga

This. I don't know why they are pissed about this. It's a great move that creates a friendly tension-free environment for developers. I wouldn't work in an environment where everyone can act like an asshole however they want.
>inb4 SJWs wrote it
I don't care who wrote it.

Just support GNU, homos.

you have to go back.

Attached: 1483837304717.jpg (557x305, 114K)

none of this is true. the implementation of CoC is the beginning of bullying and firing just about every straight white male taking part in the project. Now with CoC, firing them would be as easy as accusing some random guy on the streets for being racist. this is anything but a friendly environment, it's literally the opposite. retards in these threads really believe that it is what sjws call it, or just commie leftards on damage control.

Ruby

Original post: bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004
Based response: bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004#note-145
CoC added: github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/issues/1297
Whining: github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/issues/1297#issuecomment-185411893

Told status: [ ] Not told, [x] Told

Instead of being a NEET, try working a real job where everyone can act like an asshole however they want. I want to see how long you're going to survive there.

I work in such an enviroment. It's literally all I could wish for.

>none of this is true. the implementation of CoC is the beginning of bullying and firing just about every straight white male taking part in the project
This hasn't happened. Not in FreeBSD, not in Firefox, not in Linux and not in GNU.

Hell, try insulting coworkers on any company. These are basic civility rules, the problem is that retards like you believe it's OK to mistreat others if they're not in front of you.
>Now with CoC, firing them would be as easy as accusing some random guy on the streets for being racist. this is anything but a friendly environment, it's literally the opposite. retards in these threads really believe that it is what sjws call it, or just commie leftards on damage control.
You're victimizing yourself in imaginary situations you yourself invented.

Attached: 1561048809733.png (1920x1080, 901K)

>white male
Most of the FreeBSD developers are white males, I don't see them being kicked out. And any reasonable organization would require hard evidence of policy violations, your "accusing some random guy" argument doesn't hold anything in a properly managed environment.

Who is white?

Won't work.
Big Corp investments don't even work in the case of VOX Media as they are still going down under even with 250m injections, and walkouts keep happening. I expect the same for this dogshit collective of frauds.

As usual:
GO WOKE, GO BROKE.
>GAWKER MEDIA
BTFO AND LOSING ALL MONEY,
AIN'T WORTH SHIT,
NOBODY WANTS TO BUY IT,
IT'S SELLING UNDERVALUED,
THE SJW GARBAGE IS BEING FIRED
>UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS WHICH BOUGHT GAWKER DOGSHIT
>FUSION MEDIA GROUP
>Deadspin, Gizmodo/io9, Jalopnik, Jezebel, Kotaku, Lifehacker, Splinter
BTFO AND LOSING ALL MONEY,
AIN'T WORTH SHIT,
NOBODY WANTS TO BUY IT,
IT'S SELLING UNDERVALUED,
THE SJW GARBAGE IS BEING FIRED
>SALON MEDIA GROUP
>worth 1.5 Billion in 2006
BTFO AND LOSING ALL MONEY,
AIN'T WORTH SHIT,
NOBODY WANTS TO BUY IT,
IT'S SELLING UNDERVALUED,
THE SJW GARBAGE IS BEING FIRED
>NeoGAF
IN THE YEAR OF 2017,
SJW's INFESTED THIS BIN
CORRUPT SMEAR MERCHANT "JOURNALISTS", PEDOPHILE MODS,
AND FINALLY A RAPIST "FEMINIST" ADMIN,
DOWN WENT THE SHIP OF SJW FAMINE
>VOX MEDIA
>The Verge, Vox, Polygon, Curbed, Eater, SB Natio
BTFO AND ALWAYS LEAKING MONEY,
'1%' INVESTORS DESPERATELY INJECTING HONEY,
EMPLOYEES DOING WALKOUTS, LAYOFFS, WHINING
THAT'S WHAT YOU GET WITH SJW FAMINE
>ThinkProgress
AMONG THE TOP THIS PROGRESSIVE DUMP ONCE WAS,
ITS FINANCES COLLAPSING FROM THE CONSTANT BRAWLS
SJW's SEETHING, INVESTORS KEEP BLEEDING,
I'M APPLAUDING, GRINNING, CHEERING!

GO WOKE, GO BROKE
GO WOKE, GO BROKE

Attached: GET WOKE GO BROKE.png (1070x1220, 945K)

You should care who wrote it. You know their ideology, a coc is just the thin edge of the wedge on speech controls.

Wtf does that have to do with anything?
FreeBSD is FOSS. Corporations donate to foundations such as the FreeBSD foundation because they use the software and want it to be maintained.
Online newspapers going out of business is so completely unrelated you fucking retard

>Wtf does that have to do with anything?
Everything.
>FreeBSD is FOSS.
Irrelevant if you understand the full picture.
>Online newspapers going out of business is so completely unrelated you fucking retard
Very related.

Here's where your retardation is:
You assume money is going into capital reserves for the core service/product development of the site.
It isn't. The drainage killing these companies is money being wasted on redirection into outreach programs, SJW "bonuses", and socio-political initiatives, and most importantly meme PR postions to stave off SJWs calling their hordes to attack the company or even antifa to attack its premises and protest in-front in coercion. The wastage is impressive to say the least. Which is why they keep failing despite such injections.
That's how you go from a 1.5b business into being sold off at 5m in 10 years.

It's FOSS, but what happens to a project with a draconian code of conduct when the corporate money stops rolling in? Not too many people want to willingly sign up to that.

imagine using a pozzed os made by berkeley cia niggers in california

good riddance then

sqlite also got cucked, by mozilla i'm assuming

>draconian
it probably just says stuff about not being a racist fuck and bullying trannies

>Physical contact and simulated physical contact (e.g., textual descriptions like "*hug*" or "*backrub*") without consent or after a request to stop.

lmao
that is unreal

Still, if you're contributing to an open source project do you really need to talk about anything that isn't the software itself?
I've never seen people on github start talking about their personal life or shit like that.

>First of all, love the Lord God with your whole heart, your whole soul, and your whole strength.
Completely based

Noone's fucking mistreating anybody in these projects, people just want to write code. Those rules are not needed, as they were not needed in the past. SJW on the other hand come there and straight up impose fucking rules, being vanguard of incompetent faggots that are to come and replace actual skilled coders, taking them down for toxic masculinity, mysoginy, homophobia whatever shit they come up with.

For example, the linux tranny openly bashes meritocracy, what matters is claiming some imaginary landmarks for fucking snowflakes at the cost of actual quality of product and careers of professional coders with passion.

good. get woke go broke. fuck them.

Arbitrary enforcement can easily turn draconian. Who is to say that criticizing some tranny's code isn't seem as bullying? That vox fag was able to get YouTube as an attack dog when he felt someone was "bullying". The truth is, most people won't be assholes if you give them the benefit of the doubt, rather than treating them with suspicion. It's not really free software when you don't actually respect freedoms.

>bullying
>guy was constantly calling him a lispy queer
I mean why the fuck should that be acceptable in any community?
Even if it wasn't about some SJW topic like gays/trans/black people/etc why the fuck should people be allowed to hurl very personal insults at each other? It just seems logical that shit shouldn't be allowed

Catering for SJWs don't do shit to your sales.
It's hiring SJWs that do, because they get in a position where they can fire people and fire everyone of talent from your company to hire their friends.
And if you see it with a racial lens, you don't even see it happening because they hire a bunch of whites.

>guy with a lisp calls himself queer
>someone calls him a lispy queer
>I AM OFFENDED, BAN HIM
yea dude unacceptable

If only every one was as nice as matz.

Attached: 1910968816_1a867b3f51_o.jpg (1425x1736, 737K)

If you can't handle the heat, get the fuck out of the kitchen.

>being this deliberately obtuse
There is no way you truly believe that he called him that without intending to belittle him for being gay. But either way, YouTube banning creators is neither here nor there. I could even give a shit if YouTube didn't ban him. YouTube is a video posting platform. You don't have to interact with other people posting videos.
If you're working together on a project, you have to work with other people. If people are insulting each other in deeply personal ways that is not conducive to a stable working environment. And if that means that some people will leave because they absolutely need the freedom to be assholes within a project, so be it. It's more fair for them to fuck off rather than people who are trying to get work done without acting like children.

Do you have a budget or annual report showing that a large part of the budget is leaking out due to redirection to SJW programs? You're claiming that somehow you can go to 5m from 1.5b just by doing that right?

Or are you claiming that it's more the culture change and public reception that comes with the "SJW shift" that kills business?

Dude called himself a lispy queer, so there shouldn't really be a problem with it. Regardless, a proper response to Crowder is most certainly not using a media company to call out YouTube to try and deplatform someone. Shit like codes of conduct are pretty fucking awful because it's an easy road to remove someone you dislike. They fall prey to arbitrary enforcement and inconsistent interpretation. You've probably seen similar shit when forums fall apart when moderators typically protect their buddies but are absolute dictators when it comes to everyone else's posts, you can plainly see it with Resetera right this moment.

>Dude called himself a lispy queer, so there shouldn't really be a problem with it.
Do you go around calling black people niggers because they call themselves that so there "shouldn't really be a problem with it"?
It's the same exact thing. You're not Crowder's lawyer, stop pretending that what he did was not ill-intentioned or abusive in nature

>You're claiming that somehow you can go to 5m from 1.5b just by doing that right?
On the longer term it can, as all those media sites showcase, which is combined with the last sentence in your post. 1 decision which leads into a vicious circle of butterfly effect which feeds itself into ruin.

Same as with Firefox.
The reason they are stripping functions and features and customization constantly is because they need to lower the maintenance threshold for less competent SJW programmers who know less and less about the shit they are doing than the former employees of Mozilla who have been replaced by outreach initiatives and capital redirects which also came as a result of redirecting from the salaries of actual competent higher tier programmers who are getting the fuck out to find another job where their skills are better paid and better respected, which leads us into FF losing even more userbase. It's a vicious circle of retardation when you combine social politics with a business that doesn't deal in it. Contrary to ignorant opinions you CAN'T do both.

>incels left the project
Explain again how that's supposed to be a bad thing

>Do you go around calling black people niggers because they call themselves that so there "shouldn't really be a problem with it"?

actually yes. you retarded faggot nigger politically correct freedom-hating jews make EVERY self-respecting, sane person racist and homophobic

tic-tock linux niggers
your time is coming soon too

Hope you do this irl and get irl b&

Let's not pretend that Maza is some kind of shining paragon of virtue.
The reason why people don't go around calling blacks niggers to their face is because most people don't want to go around acting like assholes or don't want to get into a fight (this shouldn't be the case, where people respond to words with physical violence, but reality is different). People usually have a tendency to self regulate, it's a self correcting issue. Treating people like they are mean from the start is a surefire way to prod them into being an asshole. Maza did not just get attacked by Crowder out of nowhere, it started with Crowder criticizing Maza's videos. Remember, Maza called Tucker Carlson a white supremacist. There is no evidence to back that up. If calling Maza a lispy queer or a gay wonk is out of bounds, how is calling Carlson a racist not out of bounds as well?
Arbitrary enforcement is always a bad idea, and we shouldn't pretend that certain groups get to own words. It ends up creating a mess. The proper way to react to someone being an asshole is typically just to ignore them. If they keep persisting and you don't respond otherwise, it's harassment, which is a different matter entirely.
Also, Crowder was just a recent example of this kind of thing. Another case with arbitrary enforcement of speech would be blacklisting Communists and McCarthyism back in the 50s with innocent people ending up in jail. It's bad no matter which way you spin it.

Is this real? 500$ from Apple? hahahahaha Apple should pay this the same about 250k

>The reason why people don't go around calling blacks niggers to their face is
Is because there's no point to insult a blackie in their face when they have a high chance of being murdered by another black person in the imminent future whether directly or indirectly through the usual stray bullets constantly flying in black hoods.

Windows doesn't have this problem.

Yeah, I said fear of physical violence as part of that.

>There is no evidence to back that up
There is a lot of evidence for a case to be made. White supremacism is an ideology and there are policies that only make sense from a white supremacist point of view. Making a case that someone's ideas are in line with those of white supremacists should be protected speech and is an important part of political discourse.
Insulting someone by calling them a slur, when that slur is describing part of their innate identity is in no way comparable and does not have any purpose other than demeaning.
"Racist"/"white supremacist" is not a slur, although some would very much want society to treat them as such, namely racists and white supremacists.

>(this shouldn't be the case, where people respond to words with physical violence, but reality is different)
People are emotional, they're not robots.
When you call someone a word that signifies to them that you believe they are less than human because of something they can't change, it will offend them deeply, especially when that is a view they are aware a large portion of the population holds and that has caused them pain in the past.
If you insult someone's dead mother to their face, you can expect them to get pissed off and maybe get violent. It's no different.

Did you read my post at all? That's very much arbitrary enforcement. Why is calling someone a lispy queer when they are indeed a lisping queer wrong, but attempting to defame someone by calling them a white supremacist all good? If your goal is to prevent people from being mean to each other, you have failed already. All you did is give a tremendous advantage to one group of they want to be mean. Queer is a word with many different meanings and interpretations. It's ridiculous to act like calling someone a queer supremacist is alright but calling them a queer is a big no-no. Some people will do bad things with the freedoms they are given, but that is no reason to strip everyone else of those freedoms. That's like banning all programs licensed under GPL because someone used a GPL program to steal money from a bank.

I'm not expecting them to not react, I'm saying it would be nice if they could react with words. It won't change, but people should actually try to communicate. Words shouldn't effect someone so much that they feel a need to get physical.

This is the most HN post I've ever seen.
You have to go back

cuck

The incels were the ones doing all the actual work.

Once again, you're acting like it's vague and posing all these hypotheticals about the meaning of words and how one can't possibly know what was meant.
Calling someone a lispy queer in the way Crowder did is only meant to demean someone on the basis of their sexual orientation. This whole "many different meanings and interpretations" thing you're doing is complete bullshit if you try being honest rather than a shill.
And you might say it's arbitrary, but it isn't. "Protected classes" (e.g. race, gender, age, disability, or sexual orientation) are embedded in the laws of most civilised countries. This is not random or arbitrary. It is important for society to prevent bullying on the basis of those factors.
Politics is not one of those factors. Politics can be changed and are not (usually) assigned to you by your parents.

No, I'm being absolute about it. It is fucking vague. You don't give a fuck about stopping people from being mean (which is still fucking lame, but whatever), you want to silence people you are uncomfortable with. Don't be crying when the pendulum swings back and your speech is being repressed. The idea of protected classes is fucking retarded, and that will blow up in your face. There is no reason to give anyone extra power. It's completely fucking arbitrary, whether the protected class is straight white men or queer black Jewish trannies. Intersectional politics are fucking stupid and authoritarian. You are the shill, turning a blind eye to what Maza did. Fuck off back to Vice/Vox.

What's the problem? Queer and nigger aren't even on the same level of disrespect in terms of the person being addressed as such, as evidenced by the fact that there's the word "Queer" in LGBTQ, but no nigger in the NACCP. If you call yourself a fucking queer and want to be addressed as such, don't be offended when people you disagree with do exactly that.

BSD is "open source" as in the commercial software development methodology.
However, BSD is not (F)OSS, as it does not adhere to MIT hacker Richard Matthew Stallman's political ideology of "freedom"

i use minix

FOSS
Full
Of
Shit
Software

there isnt anything vague at all. look up "the paradox of tolerance"
neonazis want to deny people rights, which is why we need to deny them theirs.

OK, now I know you're from discord.

The paradox of intolerance is retarded, and so are you. Neonazis are barely a thing. The so called paradox of intolerance is bullshit, because it creates a purity spiral. If antifa or whatever faggy little group you support are supposed to be the enforcers of tolerance, where does it end? They've already punched many people they consider to be Nazis. The majority of the time, these "evil Nazis" that Antifa crusade against are people who did littleore than support a right wing candidate. You've seen so much fearmongering spotlighting the far right, which is an incredibly small group that you cannot see the jackbooted thugs in front of you. People who will weaponize against all those who stand against them. I don't give a shit about neonazis. If you've been around a fucking normal person anytime recently, not some crazed SJW or fearmongering leftist, you'd realize that Nazis aren't really a problem. Authoritarians, however are still very much all over. They get their kicks trying to police people's speech. You wouldn't know tolerance if it beat your lisping masked comrades and you down in yet another root causes by one of your counter protests.

I remember some significant drama over some Ruby project where owner didn't wanted to merge CoC and kick out some "racist" contributor. The guy was named Meh or something. That was fun to watch.

I think that's how you can summarize most leftist oriented political decisions.

this?
github.com/opal/opal/issues/941

>incels
such a thing does not exist

faggot

wtf i love opal now, whatever it is

awww that's sad, I have been using FreeBSD since 6.2. I'll hate to have to switch to linux.

>However, BSD is not (F)OSS, as it does not adhere to MIT hacker Richard Matthew Stallman's political ideology of "freedom"
That's completely false. Virtually all of the extant "open source" BSD's are also free software. They are not copyleft which is by design.

Calling you a murderer and child rapist is not a slur either? I wonder what it does that person, such very nice things to say to someone. Learn some fucking manners cuckboy

you're braindead and have no arguments other than what dumbass Jow Forums koolaid you've been drinking for the last few months. Maybe go back to your echo chamber to discover more talking points you can regurgitate on other boards to recruit more simps.

benno "coc enabler" rice

Are you shitting me? This entire thread you've been spewing out the most basic of talking points, and now you accuse someone of pointing out a major flaw in your argument of being alt right? You are truly a loser. From the very start, you've done nothing but lower the level of discourse in this thread. I'm glad you did, because nothing exposes stupidity better than letting it shine.

>Hey, add code of conduct
>I don’t want code of conduct
>NO WE NEED CODE OF CONDUCT!!!
>Okay, here is code of conduct
>NOO NOT THAT CODE OF CONDUCT THAT IS NOT CODE OF CONDUCT, MY CODE OF CONDUCT!!!

'struck', the word is struck, pajeet

>Arbitrary enforcement can easily turn draconian.
This is the most bullshit FUD I have ever heard and I can't believe you retards have been repeating it all this time. The code of conduct is literally there to protect YOU from being bullied. If your project's code of conduct doesn't do that then you should complain.

>Who is to say that criticizing some tranny's code isn't seem as bullying?
I have seen no code of conduct that disallows criticism of code. If you know of one of these then please post a link.

>It's not really free software when you don't actually respect freedoms.
Yes it is actually, because the software is still free. You can still run, study, modify, the program as you wish no matter how many of your trolling emoji spam github comments get deleted.

already happened at google, happening at firefox right now

If a freedom is not respected, you cannot reasonably call your software free as in freedom. A code of conduct is easily weaponizable, as you can see with opal as linked earlier in the thread, where a code of conduct maker was trying to push their special code of conduct onto the project by going after a developer that was involved, without ever actually contributing. If you honestly believe they won't use an overarching COC to take you down for what was said in other platforms, you are fucking delusional. I don't believe for a second that it protects anyone, it just gives impunity to deplatforming attempts unrelated to the scope of the project. Freedom doesn't stop where you or anyone else wants it to. It is not freedom unless it is extended to all. You sound like one of those Antifa morons who claim they are anarchists despite their attempts to establish mob rule. Stop trying to make it seem like open source projects were some kind of cesspool of undesirable behavior before cocs became a thing. They weren't, people would actually contribute code. Rampant assholes didn't become a thing until your ilk enumerated a set of rules to give themselves personal power. That's how a culture war starts. It wasn't a problem until someone decided to make it one.

You're the one being rude here.

I should have known who would be behind that comment even before opening it.
>MY COC IS THE ONLY SUITABLE COC IMPLEMENT MY COC

I wouldn't bother explaining that to them. They will claim it isn't an issue until someone they agree with is targeted. It ranges from outright malice or absolute indifference towards anyone who doesn't conform as they see fit.
Whoa man, he's just making the case that your policies are in line with a murderer's or child rapist's. Making the case that your policies are in line with a murderer's or child rapist's is protected speech. "Murderer/child rapist" are not rude things to say, although some would very much want society to treat them as such, namely murderers and child rapists.

Bsd can't play games.

Attached: 1541275601434.png (450x405, 95K)

People who say that using that saying are faggots are gender queer fem cisbois