AMDrones on suicide watch

AMDrones on suicide watch

Intel slashes its desktop lineup prices by 15%

AYMD is seconds away from bankruptcy!

Attached: 6790C709-0C5A-48D8-BDDD-BC7CE78ACFF9.jpg (850x1748, 126K)

Other urls found in this thread:

browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13495867
browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/12221001
browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/12221001.gb4
twitter.com/AnonBabble

15%is tiny compared to the performance loss after patches.

Intel is afraid

They're slashing prices to match the performance loss.

It should be 40%+ after disabling hyperthreading.

This is good for consumers regardless of anything. It just shows you Intel were just milking the consumers and Ryzen is forcing them to be more competitive in pricing. So far they tried to avoid it by increasing core counts (remember, i7 CPUs were 4 core 8 thread from fucking Nehalem in '09 to Kaby Lake in 2017) but it's clear they can't do that because
1.It's not economical anymore without switching to a chiplet design because of low yields due to massive die sizes that'd be required
2. Moar coars on the 14nm+++++ process would create literal housefires

So you should be thankful to Ryzen for better prices even if you buy the 9900KYS. That being said, it's sad that the same is not happening for GPUs because the Radeon Technologies Group mostly gave up consumer GPUs and is focusing on semi custom stuff.

Reeks of desperation.

Still bigger margins than AMD.

This. Literally WHO cares whether whomstdve is """dominating""" when the end result of competition is better shit for lesser shekels. Fanboyism is fucking gay. Get a life faggots.

>already better price/performance than AMD
>cutting prices even further

Holy fuck. Based intel.

BASED poorfag option. good you goys can have a toaster now.
AMDchads gonna dab on you with their 16c lmao

literally no reason to buy AMD now

I care. I dont care how good Intel is or becomes (hint: not very good) I won't support any company with as many jewish and israeli ties as them if I can help it.

Attached: ff2.jpg (1024x1024, 99K)

Intel is for poor niggers.

Remember to buy that high speed ram kit and 15w active cooled mobo with 16 phase vrm only $699+tip

Still better than a chiller.

Which you’ll need if you want to run your 32 gimped AMD threads above 4ghz

Daily reminder that 3950x has a 40% lower single core performance than a 9900k.
But go ahead and buy AMD goy, it'll be good in games I promise!

40% longer nose detected.

I sincerely doubt it'll be 40% worse, and why the hell would you buy a 16-core cpu for gaming?

>40% lower single core performance
So, basically 10% higher after Intel security patches? And how much cheaper?

The one got scammed prior by intel won't be happy.

Still claiming we HAVE to disable hyper threading besides pretty much everyone saying it's not needed for most people.

Wew, keep trying one day someone might believe you

>I sincerely doubt it'll be 40% worse
You're in for a surprise boy.
3950x:
browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13495867
a random stock i9 9900k:
browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/12221001
Also enjoy having a $500 motherboard with the perfect 16 phase vram to sustain the clocks so that you can just compete with the 9900k.
>So, basically 10% higher after Intel security patches?
No, basically still 40% lower since Intel security patches literally have a below 0.1% performance impact and literally 0% performance impact in games.
>And how much cheaper?
What do you mean retard? 3950x is the same price as 9900k. For now that is, Intel is gonna cut the prices on i8 and i9s by 10-15% soon so 9900k will be cheaper.

Cope

Intel has raised the price of their CPUs by $20 each generation. My i5 2500k was $199 and now it has crept up so much an i5 9600k is $309 here. Slashing it by 15% still means it's $260.

My next build has a ryzen 3600.

>pre-release garbagebench results

You sure showed us, retard.

((()))

Attached: 1481825316611.png (500x500, 3K)

Why would I buy processors made in Israel?

>geekbench doesn't matter!
Look what AMD fags have turned into, ironic.
If you think a double CCX CPU will come close to a performance of 9900k you're delusional, all the evidence is against you.

>Using a 9900k benched at 6.5ghz on ln2 to troll
Almost worked, but you can append .gb4 to the end of Geekbench results and see the frequency they were run at.

Oh btw that 3950x was benched at 4.3ghz in the single core tests because it was an early engineering sample. The final 3950x would run the single core tests at 4.7ghz + a possible +200mhz PBO if you have the cooling.

they're slashing performance by 15pct as well

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MOMMY PLEASE MOMMY

Attached: 1548641096607.png (1228x1502, 1.07M)

Oy vey dis is another holocaust

Die jew

Attached: ff.jpg (1411x1646, 388K)

based and sexhad pilled

It's true, i expected 25%.
t. exclus6buys intel

>benched at 6.5ghz
No faggot, it was benched at 5ghz.
>The final 3950x would run the single core tests at 4.7ghz + a possible +200mhz PBO if you have the cooling.
Ahahaha, yes it will run at 4.7ghz if you have a mobo with sufficient vrm that'll cost you the same as the CPU itself. Don't forget to ziptie a fan onto the vrms.

Kill yourself shill rat

Attached: 1557717109058.webm (640x360, 2.59M)

>No faggot, it was benched at 5ghz.
What part of 'you can append .gb4 to the URL and it will show you the frequencies the tests were run at" don't you understand, you lying faggot? See
which shows the 6.5ghz freqs.

OH NONONONONOON AHAHAHAHHAHA

Attached: 1551362085359.gif (520x293, 2.52M)

>I-It's 3.5ghz base but you can make it 4.7 if you have liquid nitrogen!

Attached: 1544722026629.jpg (212x237, 10K)

haha larper

Keep telling yourself that

Attached: 20181020_02393.jpg (236x326, 12K)

NOOO!! IT WAS OUR TURN BROS

Have fun Zombieloading.

That just shows that competition is good. As a consumer, you should not wish for either to "win" or "lose". You should just want both to remain competitive enough technically so that they are forced to compete on price.

No I want Intel to die out completely and a new competitor that isnt as jewish and israeli come about.

>15%
Now all they have to do is lower them by another 35% to match AMD for price/performance.

Attached: 1558216631743.jpg (1200x1114, 253K)

More like AMD needs to increase single core performance by 35% to compete with Intel.

And 2kW fridge. Oh hang on...

Attached: 1540916461662.gif (260x349, 1.4M)

Attached: 1546453046730.jpg (640x360, 37K)

Corporations exist solely to make money.
Corporations are not your friends.

Poor faggot shill owned.

Attached: 1544667387109.png (813x1402, 324K)

I know they aren't. I dont want the corporation to be so closely tied with jews and Israel and I never support those companies if I can help it.

drops prices 15%
still is like 300% more expensive

better go live in a cave then

Attached: Capture.jpg (1280x720, 183K)

AYMDRONES BTFO LITERALLY ON SUICIDE WATCH

Are you boycotting Israel?

>No faggot, it was benched at 5ghz.
browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/12221001.gb4
"processor_frequency": {
"minimum": 6562,
"maximum": 6586,

Attached: 1545818044079.png (1078x1304, 284K)

link to patreon?

So, closer to 6.6GHz than 6.5?
Intcels really are worthless and pathetic.

I said if I can help it. There is also degrees, the degree of Israel and jew influence and cooperation with Intel is much higher than most.

I dont know what to call it, I just do the best I can to not give money to filth.

AMD chips have much bigger discounts all the time.
Just today I saw R3 1200 quadcore can be had for ~$48, more than 50% down from MSRP

Meanwhile INtel never did discounts so now mere 15% are supposed to be a revlution?

>Zen 2 eats so much power they need to release fucking $800 motherboards with fans on the vrms
>while an i9 9900k does fine with hardcore overclocking on a $100 motherboard

Attached: 1558045115849.jpg (1616x1639, 735K)

I know you can do better

Somewhere out there, there are "people" who are actually stupid and blind enough to believe this.

Attached: 1544003076022.jpg (680x680, 85K)

classic stormnigger out of his containment board, heavy on rhetoric and assertion, low on content

>stormnigger

Spotted the post 2011 retard

Attached: ff_5.jpg (1200x900, 223K)

This, goddamn manchild company shills everywhere
Fuck Intel, AMD and Nvidia, why are you retards so inclined to brand loyalty while all those companies want is that you give them your money and go fuck yourself?

OH NO NO NO NO

your spotter must be broken

15% of 500 is only 75.
That's 425 USD, still over twice as much as a 2600 at 140 USD.

For a 8400, that bring sit down to 150, still more expensive than a 2600 too.

What's the point?

Attached: Laughing Whore.jpg (762x900, 161K)

Attached: 1518514766918.jpg (491x491, 61K)

>why are you looking at me like that
>i did nothing wrong

Zen+ has IPC below Broadwell.

>intel finally admitting they have competition
this isn't a problem for AMD.

See

intard shitter kike eternally btfo

Nice! So, intel is now just, how much expensive than AMD?
At least, they have better benchmarks.
Next upgrade will be very hard, once ryzen 3000 comes out

Attached: linustechtips.png (2000x1543, 87K)

So now that Intel addressed AMD as their competitor, they will be forced to stop using jew tactics a little and in the next generation of CPUs AMD will probably be beaten the fuck out.

Stay mad intard shitter, nobody buys Intel.

And yet it's still better than intel lmoa

>nobody buys Intel
Intel quarterly income: 2 billion
AMD quarterly income: 4 MILLION

but does it come with a water chiller?

can't wait for 2025, intel's comeback looks vicious

They only make chipsets for other superior companies, even Apple is ditching Intel. Their CPUs are garbage.

intel 10nm soon........................................

>People buy AMD because they believe competition will drive prices down
>Intel drops it's prices
How will we ever recover?

Intel build here we go ?

AYYYMDRONES BTFO
ANOTHER BENCHMARK WIN FOR US INVOLUNTARY TELIBATES! LITERALLY 22X THE PERFORMANCE OF YOUR CPUS
FUCKING OWNED

It has the highest single core performance of the Zen 2 product stack out of the box.

That feels great i can finally buy a 9700k at a fair price. AMD made a well worth sacrifice here.

OY VEY
We built in backdoors for mossad whats the big deal goys?

You do realize that both get paid when you purchase either of the brands, right?

Someone save me i want a new AMD rig but i am one of those hackintoshers so im almost locked in to Jewtel

9700K -$327 (already adjusted with 15% discount)
3700X -$329

So...for two dollars, I double the Thread count, while still having a virtually similar gaming performance, and having better multi-thread?

Is this a joke, inturds?

So for the

>semitic seppuku
wow

All these years before ryzen all techtubers where building gaming pc with the best i7 on the market so naturally all the kids believed that go for the most expensive cpu for gaming. That's why they think that when the 16core comes out its the only thing that you should buy. That's why when you run cpu gaming benchmark about r5s and i5s you shouldn't run them with rtx 2080 tis

good post

> That being said, it's sad that the same is not happening for GPUs because the Radeon Technologies Group mostly gave up consumer GPUs and is focusing on semi custom stuff.

ironically, we need intel to do something right when they come out with their GPU to do the same thing to nivida and their (((pricing))). even amd is starting to increase their cost because they simply can since nvidia's costs are so much higher, they can afford to be "cheaper" but still rip you off