Discussions at Intel have been interesting as of late. It looks like Comet Lake will be coming by years end

Discussions at Intel have been interesting as of late. It looks like Comet Lake will be coming by years end.

The main objective is to disrupt the desktop competition. Reasons for this are pretty obvious. This strategy is being employed to make sure competition doesn't profit too heavily, plain and simple.


2/4t
Pentium 400 3.2 - 4Ghz locked 45w 65$ MSRP
Pentium 400K 3.8 - 4.6Ghz unlocked 65w 90$ MSRP

4/8t
Core X3 420 3.4Ghz - 4.2Ghz locked 45w 120$ MSRP
Core X3 420K 3.8Ghz - 4.6Ghz unlocked 65w 140$ MSRP

6/12t
Core X5 440 3.6Ghz - 4.4Ghz locked 65w 160$ MSRP
Core X5 450K 4Ghz - 5Ghz unlocked 95w 190$ MSRP

8/16t
Core X7 460 3.6Ghz - 4.5Ghz locked 65w 250$ MSRP
Core X7 470K 4Ghz - 5Ghz unlocked 95w 350$ MSRP

10/20
Core X10 480 - 3.8Ghz - 4.6Ghz locked 65w 400$ MSRP
Core X10 490K - 4Ghz - 5.2Ghz unlocked 95w 550$ MSRP

Names are subject to change, but there has been quite a bit of communication about migrating away from the Core i label, as well as simplifying branding strategy. These also appear to be on 14nm, but new boards are compatible with next-generation processors, with this entirely new socket.

Attached: installLGA1366_2113.jpg (580x419, 112K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-238/Intel.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>2/4t 65$
>4/8t 120$
>6/12t $160
>all locked
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Intel is truly dead.

>Core X10 490K - 4Ghz - 5.2Ghz unlocked 95w
I take it thats 95w at 4ghz and 300 and 5.2?

umm no sweetie. my bull works at intel and he said no desktop 10nm until 2022

imagine having fewer than 16 cores in 2019, wow
12 cores is a bare minimum for light browsing

based

Attached: 1544989814656.png (914x678, 191K)

>unlocked bentium
>"95w" 10 core
>14nm++++++++++++++

Intel is screwed until 202X.

Sorry, you fucked up good
Intel is scrapping HT for almost all of their next-generation CPUs

Ask me how I know

>dual core processors
>2019

why

Because you don't need 16 cores 32 threads to browse the internet, watch Youtube and Netflix, or read your mail

seems pretty fake and gay

Attached: .png (782x365, 24K)

He thinks he's a "leaker"

Not everyone is a NEET and full time gamer

NEETs and full time gamers stand a better chance to be privy to info like this than OP's sorry ass, who by the way has not given us a single reason to believe his crock of shit

No, I need 4 cores 4 threads

even cellphones have quad-cores now

X86 Cores =/= ARM Cores
Core counts on a cell phone are about the most meaningless number ever, cores are not homogeneous and a good portion of data isn't even processed on a core

based larp

>being retarded enough to believe that intel would sell their 8c/16t or higher at a loss
Even if it was 10nm, all those years of delays have cost them billion of dollars already. The last thing they'll do is sell them for less than the current 9900k.

>intel can't even afford to sell 8c even at $350
>meanwhile amd shits out 8c chiplets and io dies that'll do 95% of what an intel can with a cost of production an order of magnitude lower
even if 10nm is a rousing success, intel is still somewhat shafted

I wouldn't buy Intel parts even if they were cheaper at this point in time. Intel has cut too many corners on hardware security for me to trust their shit for another 5-10 years.

Attached: 1482863951714.jpg (582x603, 87K)

AMD has more of a chance of chink shit than intel larp harder faggot

cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-238/Intel.html

TWO HUNDRED AND THIRTY-FIVE VULNERABILITIES FOR INTEL

AMD has FIFTEEN. Get fucking RAPED, retard

Attached: i'm gonna say it.png (171x354, 39K)

This

Intel chips are made in the USA, Ireland and Israel

AMD is made in China or Taiwan

now post all the chinese backdoors they haven't disclosed

you first

Ha! Total bullshit.
As if this is going to stop the bleeding of Intel losing data center customers. You know, the actual, profitable, reason to be in x86 semiconductors. Rome is an 800lb gorilla with a predilection for violent rape. Nor does this address the enormous 60% profit margins Intel has only just now recently relented on. They think they can get in to a price war with a hard to manufacture chip on a hard to manufacture 10nm node while sacrificing their enormous profit margins while throwing billions in to getting 10nm and 7nm on line? Good fucking luck.

Fuck off jewtel, I'm not buying your shit ya fucking wankers

I'm buy fucking ryzen, ayymd all the way!

t.t

Attached: spurdo sperg.jpg (518x1024, 80K)

Stop posting adoredtv things

Post proof

Plus $20 for overclocking insurance.

You're fucking stupid if you think 10nm can do 4.5ghz+
read the op again

get ready to be proven wrong in 8 months

fuck off retard

amdrone cope

?

this is completely fake worse than adoredtv leak

But those prices would fuck ryzen pretty good, especially if intel stops segmenting SMT to high end.

A 5ghz 6/12 for less than a 3600 would btfo AMD over night, it would also btfo literally ever person who bought an intel processor in the last 3 years. 7700k costing less than half its msrp 3 years later, fucking 9900ks for $100 off.


But this is like AMD releasing the 3900 at $350, or the 3600 costing $150, too good to be true prices

Y I K E S why do you nerds need that many kelvins for?

>Core X10 490K - 10/20 4Ghz - 5.2Ghz unlocked 95w 550$ MSRP
>10/20 5.2Ghz 95w
>95w

apply thyself

more 14nm++++++++++++

Attached: Intel400IQsecurity.gif (424x304, 909K)

>hyperthreading on anything below i7
no

>everything i5 and up boosts to 5GHz+
no

>new boards are compatible with next-generation processors
no

>10-core 4GHz 95W
lol, definitely not