INTEL BTFO
INTEL SHILLS ON SUICIDE WATCH
INTEL ON FULL DAMAGE CONTROL MODE
>MOAR CORES LESS TDP
MONOLITHIC DESIGN BTFO
INTEL BTFO
INTEL SHILLS ON SUICIDE WATCH
INTEL ON FULL DAMAGE CONTROL MODE
>MOAR CORES LESS TDP
MONOLITHIC DESIGN BTFO
>184KB/s
Do you own a toilet?
That USD/EUR conversion is most likely not what wee'll end up having when released
i wonder how long it took to make this thread, maybe like 6 minutes?
It had to be a fucking tripfag. How many times have you been BTFO before you retarded tripfag? I'm on 4G LTE and you should just kys right away.
I had to crop the image
Of course not, US price tags don't include VAT while Europeans do.
>tfw tiny xp running from cache
Is this possible, in theory?
delete this antisemite
INTEL POZZED HOUSEFIRES BTFOREVER
>256 MB cache
based
>256MB of cache
DELETE THIS YOU FUCKING ANTI-SEMITE
Pity they are leaving a gaping hole for Nvidia.
>256 MB of cache
Intel Corporation is dead.
POOZEN BTFO
Fuck you goy
this
no reason to upgrade from zen 1 desu
JUSTwait for zen2+ bros
Not sure about tiny XP but Damn Small Linux can run on 128mb
oy vey
>goybench
>he can't run his OS from cache
There's no VAT for companies
gentoo?
225W TDP
its a fucking house fire.
i can't wait to get one.
So how's Intel 400W glued together xeon?
64 cores at 225w is about as far from a house fire as you can get.
Go back to wage.cucking
For 64c/128t @ 3,4Ghz it's really fine, and even more if you think that EBIN die is huge so the heat dissipation is more easy to do.
POO
TO THE LOO
POO
TO THE LOO
POO
TO THE LOO
>OC 5.2 GHz
AYY
>That segmentation
They're not kidding when they say "AMD is the new Intel".
>1400 vs 4000 mm^2
plenty of room to dissipate the heat, less of a housefire than desktop cpus.
What size are those 400W Xeon abominations btw?
we know you don't, you just eat it like the fucking coprophile you are
stop shilling this in every thread you fucking faggot
no, getting waitfags buttripped is very fun indeed
>admitting to spamming
>using an image that has already been BTFO
when was that? already btfo? you're just mad
B-B-BUT YOU'RE NOT GIMPING IT!!!
>u mad??? u mad
nah, u mad
little donnie dum dum can't handle ryzen 2 acheiving the same shit as his housefire at half the price
don't forget the hardware vulnerability benchmark which shows intel ahead on 200 of them
>losing to a cpu that costs half as much
intcels really can't hold on any longer
>same
How does it feel to be mentally ill
>he's still posting the same btfo image
i dunno dude, how DOES it feel being mentally ill? might wanna stop spamming the same images too
you forgot to post the vulnerability benchmark, where intel's pulling ahead of amd by 200
he's some fag who has high-clocked RAM and an NH-D15 and is genuinely patting himself on the ass for beating the stock leaked benchmark
he keeps posting the same images in basically any thread to do with AMD and Intel
>he thinks I'm participating in CPU brand loyalist wars
haha nope, but please do post the vulnerability benchmark
how can I sage tripfag
>gaymur shit
back to /v/ faggot
post the vulnerability benchmark or fuck off
BING BING WAHOO
That's all you have hope for, a gimped test. KEK
i can't imagine you care about security flaws when you only use your computer for fortnite and use your mum's credit card to do so
>cherrypick upon cherrypick
please post the vulnerability benchmark
Ohsnap, namefag BTFO
>it's cherrypicked if it's not gimped!!
hahaha
I'm still waiting for you to post the vulnerability benchmark
yea I expected as much
>G-GIMPED! IT'S GIMPED!!!!
you say that like it's our fault
it's intel's own fault for designing a shitty processor with security holes
actual adults care about that sort of thing
either post the benchmark or go back to dabbing in fortnite
>geekbench
Adults are generally capable of understanding subtle details like the fact that normal users will never fall pray to vulnerabilities and that the patches themselves only effect some workloads.
>just don't wear a seatbelt bro it's not like you're ACTUALLY going to get into a car accident
AT THE COPE-A
COPE-A CABANA
Epyc
Actually a better analogy is that you don’t wear seatbelts on a train. Just like you don’t patch your CPU if you aren’t an enterprise user doing specific workloads.
trains don't even have the option for seatbelts in the first place retard
a lot of the patches also come through windows update and people aren't smart enough to turn that shit off
is your buyer's remorse seriously so bad that you're insisting on not using proper security?
why don't you just stick with windows xp if you're gonna be like this
price is too high
slippery slope to justifying the addition of hardware insecurities for the sake of extra performance
>make -j128
>mfw
Here's your car with defective brakes bro
>No 3900x benches
They're shook aren't they
Only resellers are exempt of VAT.
i am cum
>5.2ghz oc vs stock
>ddr3400 dual channel vs 2400 single stick
>no security patches applied
>PBO disabled
>4w per core
>housefire
SHUT UP GOY
> 1.5% faster
> 57% more expensive
If this is real, who priced this shit? Intel?
>1920x1080
>shit game
Cope
ok now how about vs the 3900x?
based
>drones think a publicly traded company cares about anything more than making money for their shareholders
Moar niggahurtz
ebyn
So it's over, Intel is dead...
Intel now, Nvidia soon™
Jesus that is way too many SKUs
You forgot to post multi ;)
Eh, it's mostly just one dual socket version, one higher binned SKU and one lower binned SKU for each core count. Nothing out of the ordinary for this processor market
>goes as low as 6K for 128 threads in one socket
How in the niggerfuck does does one chip win in one category but not the other when both are 8c16t? Your benchmark is shit.
AMD's SMT is better than intel's hyperthreading
What hyperthreading?
AMDajeet BTFO