> adds hipster icons to ls command
> pulls in a full copy of GNU coretuils as a dependency
> 308 MB
> for fucking file icons
> in fucking ls
I deserved this.
Any good examples of lightweight, functional, aesthetic FOSS, Jow Forums? I need a palette cleanse.
adds hipster icons to ls command
Landon Green
Other urls found in this thread:
git.suckless.org
github.com
lists.freebsd.org
softwareengineering.stackexchange.com
reddit.com
reddit.com
news.ycombinator.com
github.com
openbsd.org
openbsd.org
twitter.com
Adam Watson
Install OpenBSD
Blake Gray
What the hell are you talking about?
Jack King
>chaos undivided
>GNU/Linux
Is this the link we've been missing all along? Different distros are like different chaos gods
Angel Parker
>Suckless sbase ls.c: 489L
>GNU coreutils ls.c: 5310L
>Both can list files in detail
git.suckless.org
github.com
My terminal, st with some patchs applied, has ~500L less than GNU ls, has true color, and a nice and aesthetic colorscheme (gruvbox).
You literally can read the entire source of sbase in 2-3 days.
Do the same with the GNU counterparts, it would take a entire year.
So, switch to sbase, or better
Connor Stewart
>nothing is more important than how many LoC a program has
Camden Clark
You are saying that, not me.
I'm just pointing two C programs that can do the same, and one has 489L and the other 5310L.
Isaiah Jones
>You are saying that
>thing A has x lines
>thing B has y linux
>so, switch to y
you used line count alone as an argument to use one over the other, now while you didn't say "nothing is more important", like suggested, you certainly are saying that line count is important
Brayden Sullivan
>I'm just pointing two C programs that can do the same
Same core functionality =/= do the same
GNU counterparts usually offer additional options and fewer arbitrary limits (not to speak of any speed advantages).
Xavier Hill
> implying sloc has anything to do with anything
lists.freebsd.org