Riddle me this

L.I.S.P is great -- and yet almost nothing of note has been programmed in L.I.S.P

Why it do be that way though?

Attached: 220px-Lisplogo.png (220x218, 10K)

Other urls found in this thread:

locklessinc.com/articles/why_lisp_failed/
lisp-lang.org/
common-lisp.net/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Emacs

Clojure is everywhere though

There ya go fuck face, heres your answer. Jeez was typing something into a search engine too difficult for your fat ass? If you dont like this answer then find one you do like but what the fuck would Jow Forums know about why lisp failed ya moron - try some people who would know, like those who researched it
locklessinc.com/articles/why_lisp_failed/

because degenerates prefer node_modules

Crash bandicoot you retard.

You don't need to write other programs in LISP, because LISP itself is written in LISP.

Hey watch the language, this is a blue board you know.

It's LisP (List Processing). The market selects the popular, not the best.

It's easier to learn java and python.
C/C++ are slightly more efficient when it comes to embedded systems.

Those are your reasons. Lisp is a big harder to learn honestly, even if it's really worth it to understand a lot of things about languages in general. But god damn is it beautiful. Even if you never use Lisp, it's going to make you a more versatile thinker and learning other languages should be an easy task, honestly.

Attached: lisp lain.png (934x1000, 265K)