The NTP final reports found "clear evidence" of increased cancer risk in male rats from low level (i.e...

>discord tranny
You're the one who uses discord though?
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/216583385/#216593256

Attached: spammerdiscord.jpg (544x501, 82K)

>Hey we are here to install your 5G

Attached: kj274p3w-1412140610.jpg (926x617, 141K)

>janny cleaning up the 5G tranny
are jannies actually coming round to embracing the BASED lifestyle?

Attached: spam1.jpg (1645x2379, 2.34M)

OK, Ivan, try to follow me. I know it is difficult for your phenotype but bear with me.

You, Ivan, for the virtue of being a Russian, genuinely believe (you all are believing rather than knowing degenerates) that bullshitting, cheating and bullying is the way to go, because you have never seen any better in your fucking social shithole, so you are projecting these major social forces to the whole civilized world, about which you literally have no idea.

See, Ivan, before they could market shit to you on anal porn sites which the likes of you are visiting daily, they have to develop the underlying tech. It cannot be, contrary to what you used to believe, be just pure baseless bullshitting. Platforms are running 24/7 reliable and rock-solid, so mere propaganda is not enough to support this.

I know, Ivan, it is hard to believe, but there are way smarter, exponentially smarter people from all around the globe who are studying in MIT, Stanford, Princeton, Caltech and other fine establishments. These people are already, Ivan, try to follow me, already the next level of evolution of homo sapiens, compared to you. Their ancestors never drank themselves to death, they experienced no negative social selection, they are almost different species.

So, just stop shitposting, Ivan, and go squat next to a liqueur shop, literally where you belong, and let the titans push ahead technological progress of human civilization.

Who are you talking to?

At least use images of people using actual radiation safety equipment instead of ebola stock images you schizophrenic discord tranny.

Based

>not getting the joke

Attached: 1535327320909.png (640x732, 219K)

IN MICE LMAO

>you have 90s each

I'm cracking up my dudes

>In the NTP study, researchers looked at the effects of exposing rodents to extremely high levels of radiofrequency throughout the entire body. This is commonly done in these types of hazard identification studies and means that the study tested levels of radiofrequency energy exposures considerably above the current whole body safety limits for cell phones.
You fell for fake news.

Attached: 5G spammer bookmarks.jpg (522x109, 23K)

This statement misrepresents risk to the brain from the whole-body exposures used in the NTP study. While the exposure limit to RF radiation in the US is 0.08 W/kg averaged over the whole body, the localized exposure limit is 1.6 W/kg averaged over any one gram of tissue. Body tissues located nearest to the cell phone antenna receive much higher exposures than tissues located distant from the antenna. Thus, when an individual uses a cell phone and holds it next to his or her head, exposure to the brain will be much higher than exposures averaged over the whole body. When considering organ-specific risk (e.g., risk to the brain) from cell phone RF, the important measure of exposure is the SAR value of 1.6 W/kg averaged over any gram of tissue. In the NTP study in which animals were exposed to whole-body RF at SARs of 1.5, 3, and 6.0 W/kg, exposures in the brain were within 10% of the whole-body exposure levels. Therefore, in the NTP study, exposure intensities in the brain of rats were similar to or only slightly higher than localized human exposures from cell phones held next to the head.

Is this just mental illness or genuine russian shilling?

rekt

BTFO

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2642860/

>samefagging this obviously

healthimpactnews.com/2019/4th-child-develops-cancer-after-california-elementary-school-cell-tower-installed/

hmmmmmmmm

What the fuck are you on about, retard?

activates the almonds

Attached: C9tDBrDUAAAxFkU.jpg (480x328, 48K)

>I was merely pretending to be retarded

it's pretty clear that the anti-5G side is winning the propaganda war massively, just look at normie social media

telecoms industry collapse in under a year CONFIRMED

I love how you keep posting this as if it actually means anything. There are literally hundreds of confounding variables in that case which make it practically useless to draw any meaningful conclusion from.

Attached: hierarchy-of-evidence2.png (1946x1178, 172K)

trying to tell people the dangers of 5g when they think their phones already have it is a great exercise in futility

>keep ignoring the NTP study, the goyim will forget soon im sure sholomberg

>it's pretty clear that the flat earth side is winning the propaganda war massively, just look at normie social media
>Space industry collapse in under a year CONFIRMED
Social media echo chambers are not an argument user, I hope you don't seriously believe what you're saying.

>brave

Attached: 1556938811316.png (375x500, 223K)

>microwave radiation being proved scientifically harmful is the same as some morons thinking the earth is flat
lol cope

>soccer moms think its the antenna
great rebuttal to a solid article with multiple sources

>keep ignoring the NTP study
I didn't ignore it, it's a shit study. No harmful effects were found in female rats or male/female mice, and the male rat exposed group actually lived longer than the control group.

it-takes-time.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Shinjyo-2014-Significant-Decrease-of-Clinical-Symptoms-after-Mobile-Phone-Base-Station-Removal-.pdf
address this one tranny

>clear evidence
the cope gets bigger by the minute

Attached: shinjyo.png (646x667, 113K)

>some retards on facebook are vocal about their views so the industry must collapse any day now
It's a perfectly valid comparison. Anti-5G retards and flat earthers are the exact people who are going to actively seek out news stories on 5G/Space and brigade the comments/start numerous anti 5g/NASA groups. Doesn't mean shit in the grand scheme of things.

>phone radiation = microwave radiation
Sure thing retard

this is another pretty huge cope, anti-5G sentiment is becoming extremely widespread and the damage control fake news media articles are coming out already

based low information tranny

The study wasn't done with 5G dumbass. Its done with old 2G/3G tech.

Various cancers were found on the test male subjects while not on females/non-test subject. But ironically, those with the cancers lived longer life.

>health questionnaires
jej, kindly refer to

>old 2g/3g
which are much safer than newer highly modulated LTE+ signals

>they were all lying schizos gangstalking the telecoms industry i swear
just like the rats in the NTP study

Attached: facts.jpg (995x1403, 1.01M)

>this is another pretty huge cope, flat earth sentiment is becoming extremely widespread and the damage control fake news media articles are coming out already
Funny how the more you post the more you sound eerily familiar to militant flat earthers on /x/, Facebook etc

>anti 5g sentiment
most of those retards think that means the 5Ghz band on their home router and you often hear telecom people use the same terminology to refer to both even though it's wrong. also lots of people think their home router is a cellular connection among other stupid ideas.

some kind of big brain diversion strategy going on here or retarded normies
you decide

why cant your employers get insurance on their microwave transmitters? do they know something the populace is just beginning to wake up to?

*cough* asbestos *cough*

Attached: no insurance.png (633x698, 290K)

>people aren't hypochondriacs and placebo isn't a thing
>what is the multiple comparison problem
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_comparisons_problem
Good to know the veil has completely slipped now and you're unbashedly spamming the same image you always do

this is an extremely low quality post

>why cant your employers get insurance against alien abduction?
>do they know something the populace is just beginning to wake up to?

>*cough* area 51 *cough*

no, this is an extremely low-quality post
nigger

>ackshyually the industry funded hundreds of studies and they all found microwave radiation to be perfectly safe
based

pathetic admission of defeat, your pay is likely deducted because of me
cope and seethe

Attached: industry vs non industry studies.png (1324x752, 873K)

Hm might it be that there is no scientific evidence for any 5G or Wifi related illness and insurance companies don't want to get abused by retards? Really makes my penis do the big think.

>Bro! I just got a 5g galaxy s10. Wanna see?

Attached: burer_stalker_04.jpg (1421x559, 99K)

>Henry Lai
Definitely not a biased source at all, I completely trust and believe this image and its findings

>there is no evidence
Hi, user! You seem to be what we call a "low information poster"! Don't worry though, for the topic of the dangers of microwave radiation, we've got your back for real- bioinitiative.org

Bioinitiative.org is a compilation and meta-analyses of tens of thousands of studies on this very topic! Make sure to spend a few weeks reading and learning here before you wade in next time!

>pathetic admission of defeat, your pay is likely deducted because of me
>cope and seethe
So do you get paid to spam hundreds of threads or do you do it for free? I can't tell which is more embarrassing.

Attached: spam2.jpg (1534x2013, 1.85M)

yes henry lai is well known to be a trillion dollar industry with ties to the military industrial complex all on his lonesome, he must be stopped now join my anti-Henry Lai facebook page to learn more

>Bioinitiative.org is a compilation and meta-analyses of tens of thousands of studies on this very topic!
The bioinitiative report is a cherry-picked biased piece of trash that is pretty much universally denounced for it's awful methodology.
sciencebasedmedicine.org/picking-cherries-in-science-the-bio-initiative-report/

none of those posts are me, there must be a few anons who know what's up though

>denounced by buzzfeed-tier websites
wow!

Sure thing I waste time on a website compiling actual scientific peer reviewed studies and shizo ramblings. Why don't you go back to your discord tranny friends and suck each other off about the dangers of muh 5G cancer

>you need to receive money to be biased against something
lol

sloppy

>denounced by buzzfeed-tier websites
Imagine pretending to be ignorant of the multiple criticisms of the BI report from well-respected organisations
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioinitiative_Report

>source: wikipedia
my actual sides

Take your meds.

Attached: cap.jpg (458x169, 30K)

>inspect element
job

>none of those posts are me
But you admit most if not all of the posts contained in are yours, no?

nope, just seems Jow Forums is pretty organically anti-5G at this point

sciencebasedmedicine.org/picking-cherries-in-science-the-bio-initiative-report/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/
retractionwatch.com/2016/03/22/a-big-mistake-paper-about-the-dangers-of-wi-fi-pulled-for-plagiarism/
thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/biased-unscientific-report-on-electromagnetic-radiation/article4313241.ece
skepticalinquirer.org/2009/09/emf_and_health_a_growing_hysteria/
coai.com/sites/default/files/BioInitiative-Report-2012-is-structured-on-flawed-procedure-and-biased-perceptions.pdf

I'll be looking forward to you refuting every single one of these source sometime after the heat death of the universe then.

>hurrr how do references work
"BioInitiative report (publication no. 2008/17E)". Health Council of the Netherlands. 1 September 2008. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
Rodney, Croft; Abramson, Michael; Cosic, Irena; Finnie, John; McKenzie, Ray; Wood, Andrew (18 December 2008). "ACRBR Position Statement on BioInitiative Report" (PDF). Australian Centre for Radiofrequency Bioeffects Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 January 2010. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
"Comments on the BioInitiative Working Group Report (BioInitiative Report)" (PDF). EMF-NET. 30 October 2007. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) (October 2009). "COMAR technical information statement: expert reviews on potential health effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and comments on the bioinitiative report". Health Physics. 97 (4): 348–356. doi:10.1097/HP.0b013e3181adcb94. PMID 19741364.
"Stellungnahme zur Sendung "Bei Anruf Hirntumor?" von Report Mainz vom 29.10.2007" [Position on the Broadcast by Report Mainz "Brain Tumours by Telephone?" of 29 October 2007] (in German). Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz [Federal Office for Radiation Protection]. 30 October 2007. Archived from the original on 28 May 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2010. Das BfS hat den sogenannten „BioInitiative Report“ unmittelbar nach dessen Publikation einer ersten Prüfung unterzogen und festgestellt, dass er klare wissenschaftliche Schwächen aufweist: Insbesondere werden Vermischungen der gesundheitlichen Wirkungen von niederfrequenten und hochfrequenten Feldern vorgenommen, die fachlich nicht zulässig sind. Die überwiegende Mehrzahl der dem Report zugrunde liegenden Studien ist nicht neu: Sie wurden bei der Festlegung der derzeit gültigen Grenzwerte bereits berücksichtigt.

"5.3.1 BioInitiative" (PDF). Mise à jour de l’expertise relative aux radiofréquences - Saisine n°2007/007 [Update on the state of radiofrequency research - Reference #2007/007] (in French). Agence française de sécurité sanitaire de l’environnement et du travail [French Agency for Environmental and Occupational Health Safety]. October 2009. pp. 322–326. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2011. ...les différents chapitres du rapport sont de rédaction et de qualité inégales. Certains articles ne présentent pas les données scientifiques disponibles de manière équilibrée, n’analysent pas la qualité des articles cités ou reflètent les opinions ou convictions personnelles de leurs auteurs (...), il revêt des conflits d’intérêts dans plusieurs chapitres, ne correspond pas à une expertise collective et est écrit sur un registre militant.
"Study on Radiation From Mobile Towers and Cell Phones". Indian Council of Medical Research. 22 February 2013. Retrieved 8 March 2013.
"Study on Radiation From Mobile Towers and Cell Phones" (Press release). Press Information Bureau. 22 February 2013. 92395. Retrieved 9 December 2014.

>cant refute the NTP study
>cant refute bioinitiative
cope

Attached: 2G vs 3G cancer rates.jpg (926x764, 126K)

>cant refute the NTP study
Already done earlier in the thread
>cant refute bioinitiative
Already done by multiple well respected organisations

>Already done earlier in the thread
Nope
>Already done by government industry shills
Nope

>pretty organically
>organically
>organic

Attached: mmmeme.jpg (393x310, 72K)

>mmmeme.jpg
dont search this one in the archive folks

Still waiting for you to refute a single source

You're fooling no one but yourself at this point with your childish finger-in-your-ears attitude

Okay I won't thanks for the heads up

all of their authors are paid government ex-industry or current industry shills, like ICNIRP
next

Attached: industry vs non industry studies.jpg (1324x752, 139K)

Oh then I'm looking forward to you documenting that for every single author of every single article and study I linked.

>cant refute the NTP study
>parrots Buzzfeed talking points about how "the microwaves were very powerful" and "it only affected male rats"

ehtrust.org/science/myth-vs-fact-national-toxicology-program-cell-phone-cancer-study/

ehtrust.org/expert-reaction-australian-centre-electromagnetic-bioeffects-research-criticism-national-toxicology-program-study-cell-phone-radio-frequency-radiation/

pathetic tbqh

>literally resaving his images as jpegs so he can post them multiple times in one thread
I've never seen such desperation lmao

>noticing this
absolutely clinging on for dear life at this point tranny shill, join the 40% after this thread imo

>cant refute the NTP study
I already did though, it's a shit study.
>parrots Buzzfeed talking points
Drawing attention to obviously inconsistent results and poor methodology is not "BuzzFeed talking points"

>thinks it's hard to notice repeat images in gallery mode
We're not all Alzheimer's patients like yourself

>it's a shit study
LOL
>"It's not buzzfeed talking points!"
>spews buzzfeed talking points easily refuted in

sad

>gallery mode
literal phone poster

>hurrr what is Jow Forums X
Fuck off, retard.

>literal phone poster
Care to tell everyone how you posted this image?
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/216583385/#216593256

>triggered this hard when confronted with not fitting in

I didn't you did in a weird attempt to gaslight, seethe it failed

also funny you're ignoring you are defeated

>doesn't know about Jow Forums X's gallery mode
>damage controls to make himself look like less of a retarded newfag
w e w

address or are you going to dump scat after yet another slaughterfest thread as is telecoms tranny custom?