>Smart cryptocurrency FULL integration, everything you do, share, buy, sold, watch is accountable by the blockchain >P2P File sharing (torrent) >Files can be bought, sold and be unique thanks to crypto (real ownership of digital goods) >Market for physical goods >Self sustaining profitable market that rewards creators (of all media, games/videos/art/etc) and file hosters >P2P Live streaming (acestream) >P2P Websites/communities/forums/social media (IPFS)
These are (in my opinion) all the basics to cover the entire usage of the internet.
Combine all this on a downloadable application (web hosting completely defeats the purpose) and you have a "free" (as in money), indefinitely scalable WWW that completely negates current monopolies and allows creators to not be censored and consumers to support the things they like.
All the technology for everything i mentioned already exists, its just a matter of combining it into a pretty front end.
>putting wheels on cars No thanks, i saw how those wooden wheels on the carriages broke apart on the brick streets and i don't want to be on that when it happens.
P2P will only be feasible when we have a new platform using a brand new technology based on cryptography and anonymity. Right now it's just stupid. The rest is okay, but I wouldn't trust a single app/program/company to hold everything. Would rather prefer several separate systems disputing against each other, kinda like distros on GNU/Linux universe.
Angel Bell
Who gives a fuck besides gnutards? You are not the market.
Jayden Reed
Are you retarded? You can't have P2P + STUN without exposing your IP address, it's a design flaw in the protocol. Or, you could argue, that the real design flaw is NAT, and I would agree to that. But ICE/TURN/STUN is literal privacy killers.
Julian Gutierrez
>These are (in my opinion) all the basics to cover the entire usage of the internet. >except the ones where the users have freedom and don't live in mass surveillance DRM cancer hell
Aaron Ward
You would want a company selling your data and exploring you while you use their services? Than just use Google/Facebook services
Jaxson Carter
>Google's shady business practices and mishandling of your personal data is killing the internet >lets employ mass surveillance DRM solutions instead
Ayden Thompson
>P2P will only be feasible when we have a new platform using a brand new technology based on cryptography and anonymity. Thats the point of the post >but I wouldn't trust a single app/program/company to hold everything. Would rather prefer several separate systems disputing against each other The inevitability of a single service taking over is already documented on everything we do online right now. Google "network effect" or "aggregation theory". >kinda like distros on GNU/Linux GNU/Linux is a complete and undeniable failure as a popular consumer product, bad example to use.
Samuel Mitchell
>IT IS LIKE IT IS AND IT CANNOT BE FIXED BECAUSE IT IS This is you.
Josiah Morgan
Your hallucination has been noted.
Samuel Myers
>GNU/Linux is a complete and undeniable failure as a popular consumer product so was windows, the only it's used now is because they made a licensing deal with IBM. the IBM PC was the successful consumer product, not windows
Leo Wilson
>P2P EVERYTHING!!!!! I'M A COOL ANARCHIST HACKER LIKE YOU GUYS!!! This is you.
>both systems have existed for the same time, one belongs to one of the biggest companies on earth and is used by 90% of the world that owns a computer, and the other is used by neckbeards to watch anime titties on video players that use text as config files, and they are both a comparable failure Oh, for a moment there i thought you weren't a retard that could understand basic society rules and economics.
Anthony Morales
Your hallucination and complete lack of reading comprehension has been noted.
Eli Lee
>"free" (as in money) Ask me how I know that you live in your mom's basement and you don't pay utilities.
Julian Walker
>indefinitely scalable WWW that completely negates current monopolies >e-e-except for the microsoft monopoly, t-t-that one is good! f-f-free market bad!
John Long
Your recordings and note takings has been noted, jew.
Lucas Howard
Imagine knowing nothing about technology and yet posting your hot opinions on Jow Forums That takes a special kind of autism
Bentley Foster
You have no comprehension of how a P2P network integrated cryptocurrency works.
Your hallucination has been noted.
Imagine having no logical argument and using ad hominem instead because you are too insecure to admit you don't know something.
Angel Martin
>You have no comprehension of how a P2P network integrated cryptocurrency works. Electricity isn't free kid.
Ryan Ross
>ptp livestream >ptp websites Good luck havingore than 10 viewers, or 100 concurrent visitors to your website. >Real ownership of digital goods Cringe
Luke Wilson
>monopolies are okay as long as it's one i approve of! >everyone else is hallucinating! based schizoposter
Christian Johnson
>Good luck havingore than 10 viewers, or 100 concurrent visitors to your website. You don't understand how the technology works. >Cringe Cringe is being a communist in 2019 and thinking that you can have a thriving community of any good (digital of physical) without a monetary incentive to drive it.
Isaac Carter
Go on the internet and search what quotation marks are used for, you'll learn something new today.
Thomas Nguyen
Your hallucinations of my thoughts have been noted.
Christopher Ross
Digital goods should not be compared to physical goods. You can't feed your family with digital food.
Carter Diaz
Back to Plebbit newfag.
Grayson Bennett
>argue in favor of monopolies >backpedal and insist it never happened when anyone can scroll 10 posts up and see based schizoposter
Ryan Baker
>You can't feed your family with digital food. You can if you create digital goods that can be sold without being freely multiplied.
Hudson Phillips
Not an argument.
Your hallucination has been noted.
Noah Collins
>tell everyone else they're hallucinating >this makes my arguments correct! based schizoposter
Bentley Smith
>You don't understand how it works Sure great explanation you have there to enlighten me fagget. >Muh gib me money No
Jeremiah Adams
Except your economic incentives are backwards. The goal of agriculture is actually to decrease the cost required to multiply a plant, not increase it.
Mason Allen
Your hallucination has been noted.
>Sure great explanation you have there to enlighten me fagget. At least you admit you know nothing about what you are talking about, read about IPFS and related technologies.
Is there an argument here? Why are you comparing the efficiency of making a mass scale (which is unique and not free) product to the fact that that monetary incentives is what drive current content creation in the real world.
Ayden Ortiz
>tell everyone else they're hallucinating >this makes my arguments correct! based schizoposter
Gabriel Barnes
Yes and those monetary incentives are already working fine without crypto DRM bullshit. Information finds its price in a market. Your solution argues in favor of price fixing, so I can't support that.
Nolan Robinson
Im building my own youtube stash and spreading it through soulseek and gnunet
Josiah Morgan
Preliminary spec of what you're talking about available here:
Jeremiah Morales
>Yes and those monetary incentives are already working fine without crypto DRM bullshit. No they aren't, in the current political climate you can only monetize one type of opinion, everything else makes you instantly an outcast and everyone deplataforms you, even your bank.
Bentley Cruz
>Your solution argues in favor of price fixing Prince fixing? Im not sure how you came about that conclusion, everyone would be able to set their own crypto-price to their own product.
Jackson Phillips
This already exists.
Julian Rivera
And its part of what i wrote on OP. Everything i wrote on OP already exists and is possible to do right now, we just need someone that makes it all work together and puts it in a neat package, like what Steve Jobs did with the iPhone.
