>robustness
Robustness
Caleb Thomas
Hunter White
>stable == running the same battery of unit tests a million times
Sebastian Hill
Imagine not understanding unit tests
Grayson Myers
What about that post infers they don't understand unit tests?
Jace Roberts
Imagine thinking unit tests prove robustness
Jaxson Cooper
>battery
>a million times
Because exhaustive test cases are for brainlets who don't understand how to to check edge cases efficiently.
also
>infers
(you)
Samuel Harris
>time complexity
>space complexity
Jordan Martinez
Imagine your transliterating function crashing your program because you gave it an angle bracket
Isaac Morales
imagine not sanitizing your inputs
Michael Ramirez
> but what if I already thought of evey edge cae
stay webshit, my guy
Daniel Stewart
unit tests dont prove robustness, but extensive testing is as close as you can get to it (though you can prove algorithms / protocols with some cool tools i ever use)
Easton Price
shut up retards
Andrew Anderson
lmao that reminds me of a boomer at work that says FreeBSD is more robust than Linux but he can't explain why
Landon Kelly
wrong img
Hunter Sullivan
if(input_type != operational_type) {
return dilate;
}
Jacob Cook
>boomer wallpaper
>boomer complaints
boomerpilled
Nolan James
>but extensive testing is as close as you can get to it
if you aren't doing property based testing, you aren't testing shit
Jace Garcia
>robust
>not even antifragile
Logan Diaz
it's easy if you try
Ryan Morris
>not following the via negativa principle in code
Joseph Murphy
while (poster == INCEL) {
puts(HAVE_SEX);
}
Robert Murphy
Oliver Lee
...
Jack Bell
WHAT IS DILLATE SOMEONE TELL ME
Josiah Cruz
void explain_term_to_newfag(char *term) {
return;
}
Ian Young
> not posting the graphviz code
Austin Hughes
don't google it
Landon Harris
What if you have a lot of edge cases? So if I have a lot of tests, I don't understand unit tests? A project with 5 tests would therefore be top shit?
Landon Campbell
>user-first
>code-first
Jack Ortiz
>Jow Forums