>Google >only provide updates for their own hardware line >leave OS and security updates completely up to asian OEMs >only OEM that provides 4-5 years of security updates is Samsung, with 2 years of OS upgrades
>Microsoft >provides one universal OS for all hardware >supports all hardware from today to 30 years ago >patches released every tuesday without fail
>Linux >same as above
>Apple >release OS only on own hardware >cripples hardware with every update to force repurchase of new hardware
I want updates when updates are needed, such as the security ones. I don't need updates ever day if there's nothing worth updating. If your shit is good you don't need to update it all the time.
Sometimes I think some of the software gets fake updates every day just to please those retards who for some reason like their "work" being interrupted.
All you're getting with updates is more spyware desguised as security.
Jonathan Rivera
linux is a colonel
Ethan Wilson
wrong
Luis Price
spotted the CIA nigger
Samuel Scott
dilate
Leo Scott
>Microsoft >supports all hardware from today to 30 years ago
The closer to reality answer would be all hardware since the P4/Athlon 64? Windows now requires at least SSE2 on 32-bit installs AFAIK
Jack Richardson
LINUX
Jason Morris
based bill
Bentley Jackson
yikes
Nathan Anderson
>2019 >applel and google still can't properly update their OSs
Oliver Edwards
But they do. Windows 7 is still supported until 2023 and it will run on a Pentium II from 1998.
Blake White
dilate
Henry Green
dilate
Thomas Howard
Linux. It should be easier on Windows to delay or handpick updates.
Lincoln Cook
They're still selling shitty laptops with 1.6 GHz celeron processors as "new" at walmart
Ryder Rogers
Not anymore, some update broke support CPUs without SSE2. It will work if you avoid it, though.
Bentley Lewis
wrong
Colton Rivera
continue
Leo Cook
Have you heard about Android One?
Carter King
9front is communist software and just like communism, it doesn't work.
Juan Allen
linux is obviously the best update system, all aspects of the operating system easily updated including programs and done very easily and without disruption in almost all cases. it's actually amazing that microsoft still hasn't caught up to where linux was ages ago. it's more interesting to ask who is second best at updating because I really don't know.
Noah Perry
MS/Linux
Nathaniel Campbell
this i can't believe winfags want linux to get disparate installers
