What update paradigm does Jow Forums prefer?

What update paradigm does Jow Forums prefer?

>Google
>only provide updates for their own hardware line
>leave OS and security updates completely up to asian OEMs
>only OEM that provides 4-5 years of security updates is Samsung, with 2 years of OS upgrades

>Microsoft
>provides one universal OS for all hardware
>supports all hardware from today to 30 years ago
>patches released every tuesday without fail

>Linux
>same as above

>Apple
>release OS only on own hardware
>cripples hardware with every update to force repurchase of new hardware

Attached: 1534853739973.png (325x155, 46K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eAdAYeBaz1U
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

None of the above.

Attached: 9front-hierarchy-of-values.png (800x599, 107K)

I want updates when updates are needed, such as the security ones. I don't need updates ever day if there's nothing worth updating. If your shit is good you don't need to update it all the time.

Sometimes I think some of the software gets fake updates every day just to please those retards who for some reason like their "work" being interrupted.

All you're getting with updates is more spyware desguised as security.

linux is a colonel

wrong

spotted the CIA nigger

dilate

>Microsoft
>supports all hardware from today to 30 years ago

Attached: .jpg (803x688, 141K)

He's right you know.
youtube.com/watch?v=eAdAYeBaz1U

The closer to reality answer would be all hardware since the P4/Athlon 64? Windows now requires at least SSE2 on 32-bit installs AFAIK