ALL OGRE

9900K is 480~500$ and a ~200$ deliberately gimped 3600 (non-X) already BTFOs it.

>that garbage single core score
Every time, never change AMD.
Do you think it'll be different for any other Zen 2? I seriously highly doubt it. That means AMD is a joke.

Attached: 1539173446807.png (615x746, 260K)

>5.2Ghz
what is this? LN2? would be amazing if PBO could push it in 5Ghz range when watercooled
>geekbench
too bad its just this shitty (((benchmark))) for now. anyone know if we get 3950X benches too when reviews drop 7th July?

Attached: 1557320721274.png (1037x311, 340K)

>3600 BTFO's 9900k
Look at this everyone, this is the delusional state of AMD faggots. They need to tell themselves these lies because they're retarded.
Not even 3900x nor 3950x BTFOs 9900k in games, ape.

Nothing few updated benchmarks can't fix.

DELID THIS IMMEDIATELY!!!

THE ADL HAS BEEN CONTACTED.
DELID. DIS. IMMEDIATELY.

Attached: 1560255798134.gif (380x184, 1.06M)

Go back to Jow Forums.

dump your whole folder here while you're at it, i'm interested

>windows
Next time use an OS which doesn't have terrible performance on CPUs with more than 4 cores.

Attached: PoshFrigidAtlanticblackgoby.webm (1920x1080, 857K)

That's the point, though. Zen 2 was deliberately heavily gimped by using Shitblows 10, yet it utterly BTFO'd a "more core" and most expensive Inturd. Now imagine Phoronix's tests on proper Linux and BSD in just a couple weeks from now.

Attached: 1552710614062.jpg (2048x1536, 185K)

>benchmark on a platform no one use
Based. That's the spirit of benchmarking

>falling for the 'you need more than 4 cores' meme
guffaw

Attached: 1505208790773.png (280x305, 122K)

Zen un-memed it, though.

ITS ALL OGRE NOW

Attached: impressive.png (668x65, 4K)

i7 2600k is still the eternal cpu user, it'll never be obsolete and I feel sorry for everyone who didn't buy one

>2600K
>never obsolete

Attached: 2600KBTFOBYRYZEN2600.jpg (1395x888, 345K)

Credit where credits due, amd have gone from a complete waste of money to nearly being competitive with intel in only a couple generations.

2600k has higher clock speeds, owned

>5528 single score
My fucking 7 year old i7 3770k does 4k single score, wtf is this shit?

Attached: 1533977391463.png (1196x676, 1.05M)

Attached: 2600KDED.jpg (1431x900, 352K)

>to nearly being competitive with intel
lol

Attached: 669d7dca5e06858257d49e3a169fa990.gif (325x498, 909K)

>wtf is this shit?
It's called "Inturd"

Attached: IoT.jpg (1500x1164, 337K)

>intel has toilets

A step above AMD

>"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, ALL NIGGERHURTZ ARE EQUAL AND SAME ACROSS ALL ARCHITECTURES AND TECHPROCESSES!!!11"

Attached: INTURDBTFODED.png (391x117, 360K)

the fuck is this gay shit. post real benchmarks, not that marketing crap
>nice to haves
lol

intel got more security issues, higher is better. intel fucking WON

>post real benchmarks

Attached: 1557268598541.jpg (1327x1222, 331K)

Funniest thing on all of this is incel shills have to resort to compare intels 500usd cpus (with 100+usd coolers) with amds 200usd cpu on stock cooler to claim "victory", while amd shows 750usd cpu absolutely demolishing intels 2000usd cpu.

*$499 high speed ram and $499 active cooled 570 motherboard not included

>Yes, Jow Forumsoyim, your 500$ 9900K works perfectly fine with no RAM or mobo whatsoever! Just put the CPoo itself in the case and that's it! You don't even need a beefy 80+ Titanium rated PSU to sustain it's inefficiency!

It works with any old 2666 ram and motherboard.

And the best thing, with that ram and mobo it is STILL CHEAPER than btfod i9 9980xe alone. :)

>Pricing
>Higher is better
Mike's are having a slow Wednesday aren't they, toddlers can see through their bullshit!

>and, naturally, don't forget to change the socket every 6 months, Jow Forumsoyim! Stay fresh!

Attached: 1551945858457.png (1338x1181, 69K)

>just buy it goy

*12/16 core ryzen in 1/270 blocks your path*

>Intel CPU
>works with any motherboard
which parallel universe do you come from?

>just overclock it and buy fast ram goy!

Oh no no no

>simple BIOS update? NOP, never heard of it

feeling a little buyer's remorse, are we?

2933MHz is Zen+'s minimal spec, Intbecile.
Yet, 8400 is more expensive than 2600 and 2600 BTFOs even 9400 (which is even MORE expensive than 8400).

Attached: INTURD IS ABSOLUTE GARBAGE.jpg (1014x1680, 737K)

>ayyymd's housefire garbage
>while defending the 9900k
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: pepe-laugh.png (968x733, 206K)

oh christ you're a polfaggot too? no wonder

Yesterday buildzoid posted video of analysis of 180usd mobo that can power oced 16 core ryzen 3000. According to his words, there are b450 mobos that can power oced 12 cores and stock 16 core no probs and push 6 and 8 cores to the max. I know msi one is like 85 usd. So yea, it is funny to see you shills desperately crying here, watch your every "argument" fall apart and resort to shiposting, because you have literally nothing in hand.

i love my 2700u
it performs a little worse than a 2600k
for a thin-and-light laptop that's insane

Post the video?

are we forgetting the 800 WATTS UNDER LOAD meme already?
(which was about a xeon, but still, intel calling anyone else a housefire is hilarious)

its true for newer games

2400G is LITERALLY "Zen's 2600K (actually somewhat better mere IPC and PPC-wise, and obviously much more efficient), but with much better integrated graphics on board".

it is on gamenexus, he does analysis of motherboards there, right now mostly x570

t. frenchfag

Attached: 4c 4ever.png (641x345, 33K)

>Gayman'sAss
OH NONONONONONONONONONO

Attached: GN moron.png (729x243, 1.35M)

it is different guy, not that with long hair, he does technical analysis, literally describes what parts he sees on mobos, but as I said, you have no arguments, so you have to resort to shitposting

this
"tech jesus" is a colossal retard
buildzoid actually knows worth a damn

>300mhz equivalent of around 1200 score increase
>adjusted for "inflation" still puts it around 800-900 higher (same clock speeds)

Seething Intel shill

Attached: 1557775163015.png (1024x1024, 169K)

except that 3200MHz RAM is still the sweet spot which isn't overpriced anymore and Ryzen 3000 performs the same on b450/x470, but keep seething

Gayman'sNextAss*

ok time for some real talk.
to preface im not an intel shill at all just someone who knows how semiconductors work
zen 2 by all means should beat 5-6-7-8-9 gen intel simply because of the change from 14nm to 7nm. if intel took their processors and just simply die shrunk them they would crush anything that amd offers. but that being said intels been stalled for years on 10nm so expect intels 10nm processors to have good performance but either be extremely expensive or sold at a loss.

big yikes
guess I'm sticking with intel

Attached: 1541850293333.png (600x224, 13K)

9900K at 6200?
the fuck is that lie it's like 5,200

maybe in r/AMD

Why can't Intel stop being pozzed shit?

actually i did look around and 6,000-6,500 is the average for 9900K
still though, i'm pretty sure the 3800X and 3900X and 3950X should be higher upon release; especially since the 3600X is pretty close

t. 2012

@71599774
JIDF Bait/10

Attached: GayMenNerdAss.png (1173x54, 498K)

kek

Next-gen consoles are gonna use ryzen, right? That means using more cores is gonna be standard, correct?

No, PS 5 and Scarlett are Zen 2, not RyZen.

Fuck. Here's to another 8 years of consoles holding PC back

Attached: 356262.png (1330x721, 182K)

>8c/16t zen 2
?????

Attached: 1544515460084.gif (240x266, 3.86M)

>another 8 years
PS 4 is 2013.

True but PS5 is coming out next year and PS4 won't die until a couple of years at least which means most multiplats are still made with that in mind. It'd be stupid to ignore such a huge install base. Same thing happened with older consoles.

I remember reading a while back that the PS5 was likely to get a Zen+ based APU.

zen2 and navi is already confirmed by sony

>blaming AMD for Nvidia GameWorks and Unreal Engine being the most cancerous anti-gaming technoligies in the history of PC gaming

Ah, sweet

>ac4
>unreal engine
U wot?

AHAHAHAHA
COPE

Imagine Noctua failing to cool your garbage product.

Yeah i am not hyping shit up, synthetics are one thing but i rather wait for real world benchmarks from reliable sources.

>PS4 won't die until a couple of years at least
People still use PS2 and PS3. PS4 won't die for another 10 years from now.

Attached: 1546961725525.png (1024x576, 252K)

I don't know if you know how to read numbers, but the AMD part is crushing the intel in single core as well.
If the AMD part was running at 3Ghz instead of 3.3, it would still deliver a 6103 single core score that is superior to the 5528 being delivered by the intel part.

It got fucking crushed on everything this time.