Is there any tool or research out there to encode audio such that a human listener can understand comfortably, but a speech-to-text system cant understand?
Anti-speech recognition
David Baker
Other urls found in this thread:
arxiv.org
twitter.com
Nolan Diaz
welsh
Jayden Peterson
fucking lost
This
Xavier Adams
Most languages besides English.
Liam Cox
Grow up an unironic cajun like me.
Robert Thompson
This would be useful because then every youtuber could just run their video through this “filter” and then the audio is (ideally) maybe a little off but then it cant be easily sentiment analyzed by google.
Kayden Fisher
Bump
Jace Cooper
AAAAAHAHAHAHA
Aiden Evans
My sides
Gabriel Allen
This goes to Jow Forums humour
Put me in the cap, user!
Andrew Roberts
Hewwwooooo Jow Forums! ^.^
Leo Cruz
No, you have to use end-to-end encryption.
Asher Brown
The point of the op isnt to prevent someone who isnt directly trying to listen to your videos specifically. Just to frustrate mass surveillance
Jace Ross
Unironically a very important invention if it ever happens
William Butler
"adversarial noise" is a common tactic used in reverse deep-learning. It's how recaptcha hasn't been solved by bots already. whether or not the same thing exists for audio, i don't know but you'd likely have to implement it yourself in python
Nathan Howard
nevermind, here you go:
arxiv.org
tl;dr: the tiniest amount of perturbation applied to the waveform will confuse a speech-to-text algorithm. it's almost like you didn't google this before posting.....
Isaiah Martinez
>in python
Aus! Aus!
Samuel Cruz
Hermione used engorgio on her tits
Tyler Richardson
Thanks. I did but had a hard time finding anything, was getting all kinds of other shit. Google has gotten worse for sure.
Brody Jones
Will never happen. Whatever sound you can understand, a algorithm only trained for this purpose can understand it too.
Jeremiah Reyes
>how do we frustrate mass surveillance?
Simple: just nationalize all the filthy corporations doing it, user.