Previously detailed price policy Google Stadia games, this time the prices became clear. Information about Google Stadia game prices, which allows you to play games without the need for a game console, has finally become clear. Prices will be the same as those of console games. The ropes are all in the hands of the producer.
Google Stadia game prices announced First, you should pay $ 9.99 per month to use the service. Unfortunately, games are not included in this price. Google Stadia also has a similar structure to Access subscriptions on the console and PC.
>Google Stadia also has a similar structure to Access subscriptions on the console and PC. >and PC Except that the PC doesn't have access subscriptions.
Jaxon Gonzalez
lag won't matter if it's an online game. 30fps for high fidelity games my current PC can't run at all seems like a p good deal for 10 dollars t. hate Google but will give this a shot.
David Reed
it's the only transgender approved console out there
Blake Hernandez
>lag won't matter You people at Jow Forums really are retarded
Brayden Smith
>lag won't matter if it's an online game. Read your sentence again please.
How is this in any way better than parsec or the other streaming services like PS Now
Henry Young
>p good deal for 10 dollars Is it? Over the course of 1 generation which is about 7 years you will spend what, 840 bucks? Instead of just buying a console? Yep, sounds like a great deal. If you're a gay
Austin Bailey
break up jewgle open borders for israel
Hunter Ward
No one plays on parsec. And you have to host those games on your own machine.
Elijah Reyes
Guys???
???
Christian Martin
Kek. When people could get Onlive with games included for that price, why would they pay now?
I'm in the Nvidia Now beta. They run shit on some Tesla Pwhatever card that costs 10k but it couldn't play hitman 2 on ultra 1080p. It felt sluggish and had hickups with my 1gbit connection. I prefer playing medium on 1080p on my local shitstation.
I tested Google Project stream (stadia) it was equal to Nvidia now in quality but with a higher latency as they don't have a server close by yet.
It all looks blurry and washed out because of the compression, local play will be superior for a long time until they get some better video compression
Angel Bennett
Sorry sweetie but they're not even close in price
PS4 at launch with 7 years online is 770 (buying the $60 12 month cards) to 1190 (buying the $10 1 month cards). The stadia will probably have a free performance upgrade half way through as well whereas that was about 200 if you bought the PS4 pro at launch and sold your old one.
Levi Bailey
Will forever be shit until they figure out quantum entanglement .
The real scary part is if this takes off and games start to be designed with these services in mind.
Huge input lag means make everything easy, auto-aim, qte etc.
Having a giant server farm means optimising the game is less important so good luck running any one of these games on a toaster.
Jeremiah Hill
GaaS is the future, invest now if you don't want to miss the money train.
>pay sixty dollars per incomplete game to farther be restricted by Internet speed and stability Who is this even aimed at
Ian Johnson
>Pay same for less Thanks google! You are the absolute worst.
Logan Perez
Accounting as a Service Blowjobs as a Service C++ as a Service Desktop as a Service Electricity as a Service Framework as a Service Git as a Service Hg as a Service Internet as a Service Javascript as a Service KDE as a Service Lighting as a Service Memory as a Service Networking as a Service OS as a Service Protobufs as a Service Quicksort as a Service Random numbers as a Service Service as a Service Testing as a Service USB as a Service Valgrind as a Service Water as a Service X.org as a Service Yacc/Bison as a Service Zlib as a Service
Camden Diaz
>Aaas Ass ass ass service
Adrian Young
ban assault programming languages
Liam Davis
>Water as a Service
Technically we have had this for decades
Brandon Perry
>Blowjobs as a Service Pretty sure that baas already exists as a backend as a service
Anthony Gonzalez
fine, as long as it prevents another trump situation I guess
Camden Torres
Go back to /v/eddit, retards.
Cooper Jenkins
I'm pretty sure the future of home PC gaming is a home server with a 16-32 core processor you can whack in a few GPUs and just pump all your games your clients - Say something like a NUC or APU based that can handle some stuff locally, but dynamically tap into the server for more performance.
It's not impossible to do today, but its expensive and can be hard to configure, Steam can play up when its running headless, etc.
Carter Scott
It's a mix of real and imagined services
Oh right. My other idea was BLAS as a Service
Camden Cook
>$ 9.99 per month to use the service. Unfortunately, games are not included in this price.
Right then I'm not paying.
Bentley Brown
Or you can buy a 4c8t xeon and a mobo off ebay for total $50 then get a shit GPU from anywhere for any price and done.
Oliver Richardson
>Hey guys, instead of only turning on a computer when you need to work or play a game just leave it on all the time sucking up over 1000 watts all day long and contribute further to global warming
Why would i buck myself with a home server, let alone one that plays energy inefficient games.
Ayden Sanchez
That's what sleep states are for, they'll pump down your system to a router power usage.
Brayden Reed
What really interests me is just how much data Google expects people to have access to. People have mobile data caps, some people have home data caps and a lot of people get their internet slowed even on unlimited services for using more than their 'fair share'. You'd need an exceptionally stable connection too, come to think of it. I'm vaguely reminded of Assassin's Creed 2 and people getting kicked back to checkpoints because of the shortest of connection dropouts, but so much worse.
Brody Sanders
I wouldn't think about it too much. The Google internal promotion structure is designed so the best way to rise above a certain level is to launch a product, even if it doesn't have any legs. See also; all their weird chat redesigns and that gmail alternative and so on over the years
William Gutierrez
In this case I think it's more Google jumping the gun because they want to be in on the ground floor. In a decade, with 5G or better technologies blanketing most of the developed world? This might be more practical. But right now I just don't see it and I also don't see this product surviving long enough for it to become viable. Onlive failed. Sony's Playstation streaming is floundering and I don't see Microsoft's own platform doing much better.
Noah Campbell
>Prices will be the same as those of console games. Fucking pathetic. Subscription + full price for games you neither get physically, nor even have an option to download and install locally at all, plus as with all subscription garbage you never know if they ever decide to remove a game you paid for and as such making you lose access to the game. Only the monstrously stupid would pay for such a thing.
There's something really weird to me about the idea of 'owning' something that's so dependent on so many outside factors that you're never going to have direct access to. It's different from say, music on Google Play where one, the consumption of the media isn't at all impacted by the choice in platform and two, you can download it anyway if you really want to. Here you're expected to pay full price for a variable and in many ways inherently inferior experience for minimal real-world benefits, and that's not even going into how long you'll have access for versus a physical copy or one tied to a publisher's own CDN.
Owen Jackson
the future is clearly everything being in the cloud whether we want it or not because it allows the authorities to easily monitor what everyone is doing.
Sebastian Sullivan
I'm not so sure, I actually use Steam's Remote Play and Moonlight fairly often, they both work well but they're not native in the end. How noticeable it is depends on the game, but generally speaking, you'll be able to tell. Since it's going to be worse than native, you'll need an extremely good reason to make your home setup in such a way that native play is impossible for you and I don't know why you'd do that.
Why would you dump all your shit in a headless server which is only accessible via streaming when you can instead build a normal gaming PC which can both run games natively and also stream when playing natively isn't an option? Getting yourself a server-only setup ultimately only reduces your options, doesn't make much sense for the general use case.
Gabriel Morgan
there's no lag, you just have to press X to jump 3 times, before it gets registered.
>pay for the service and games You can put this on the list of Googles stillborn projects. Every other platform offers you at least new games every month for free.
Benjamin Lee
lol all PC games can be downloaded for free
Isaiah Stewart
lag is lag. it won't change due to bandwidth. So, instead of sending game data over the same cable, you instead stream video and user inputs. It will literally be as bad as rubberbanding on your average game server, in other words, (you)r small assembly of neurons that stretch the definition of a brain won't be able to tell the difference. inb4 seething inb4 cope
