Performance doesn't matter pls buy Intel

Performance doesn't matter pls buy Intel

Attached: 1561999940422.jpg (923x493, 78K)

I don't know man...

Attached: 1562004133516.png (718x379, 84K)

Attached: 1561988188930.jpg (719x568, 152K)

Who cares about productivity bruh

Attached: AMDE3Livestream_NextHorizonGaming-Ryzen-Slide-12-1024x576.jpg (1024x576, 57K)

Reminder 3600 is $199 and 9900k is $499 KEK

Attached: 2019-06-26-image-16.jpg (719x379, 42K)

Multi-core doesn't matter

Attached: graph_3.png (600x225, 13K)

It's important, which is why you need low latency for audio or video editing, which AMD still can't deliver.

Single core doesn't matter either

Attached: 1560442600794.jpg (711x457, 63K)

Lol

Attached: 1561931427789.jpg (298x190, 13K)

Thanks for confirming performance doesn't matter for Intel buyers.

Now post AMDs own benchmarks where Intel beat them at the one thing people on Jow Forums actually do; play games

It matters quite a bit.

Attached: 1562005000257.jpg (718x379, 103K)

Intel with shittier CSGO and PUBG performance? lul

>brand new processor performs better than a year old one!

Attached: images.jpg (194x259, 9K)

>Muh games

How about work? How fast is Ryzen at compiling C++?

>9900k gets destroyed in CSGO and PUBG
BEST GAMING CPU AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Attached: ryzen-3900x-gaming-benchies.jpg (1919x1440, 105K)

Are you retarded?

Are you?

Even AMD's own advertisement have Intel beating them most of the time. I actually feel a bit sad for them.

I rest my case.

3900X wins in 4 games. Imagine falling for 9900k meme.

So doing work is retarded for you. Okay. have fun with your very adult game shit, manboy.

Buttery smooth 1.6 FPS

Attached: 3900x02-720x720.jpg (720x393, 33K)

More then a pound, euro or dollar a frame.
For just the cpu. In a game.
Maybe its not a cpu that matters.

And that's with the 9900k stock and locked at 95W lol. And probably poozen with golden silicon running on 4000mhz ram

No no, raspberry pi 3 is fine. Raspberry pi 4 if you're performance obsessed.

Cope

>Year old Intel hardware beating AMDs latest products in the majority of AMDs own bias benchmarks

AMDjeets are going to be overwhelming suicide hotlines when impartial reviews come out

lol who cares, you dont need 429 fps anyway

Running out of graphs, kid?

Meanwhile everyone on the planet is going to buy Zen2 while Intel gets more pozzed and housefires kek

LOL he literally posted the same graph twice, the desperation is delicious.

Performance doesnt matter only price. as long as intel is 2x more $ they have my business because im not poor.

i9 beats Ryzen 5? Is this really such a surprise? Next time include Ryzen 9, the actual i9 competitor, in the graph.
Latency of what?

>latency of what
dilation cycles

(higher is better)

yikes

But muh gaymen CPU........

just buy whatever werks you autistic retards
jesus fuck

I thought Premiere didn't work with Zen?

CS:GO and PUBG runs terrible on Ryzen, CS:GO is a DX9 game that is single threaded and PUBG is a pile of shit.

You fell for a literal shitpost then.

>low-end cheap $199 ryzen equals the highest-end $550 9900K
kek

BASED davinci BTFOs Poomiere

Honestly I bought AMD because it's not a Jewish company.

Antisemitism!!!

Yes, precisely. Also because literal underhanded tactics by Intel in the past.

Attached: racist.gif (498x280, 424K)

>50% more cores and threads
>barely 30% better

Why is AMD always so slow?