First 3000 Ryzen Benchmark leak

So 3700x and above all get 300fps

Last one

Attached: qJ9uj5w_d.jpg (640x4006, 185K)

NO FUCKING WAY
3700X BEATING 9900K?

While using less power. Incels btfo

Attached: 04D856FF-66F0-4AC9-935D-F93730E14B70 (1).jpg (1339x1359, 334K)

Kind of a weak showing by the 3900x in games.

>640x
Fuck off

i can't see shit, 600x600 what is this 1997

Welp.
Holy fuck

3900X BEATS 7980XE IN RENDERING ????????

WHAT THE FUCK LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

>inb4 latency.

Sorry, they took that shit down really fast.

Attached: HorribleSubs_Kaguyasama_wa_Kokurasetai_02_720p0006.jpg (1280x720, 94K)

WEINER.

imgur.com/a/YkoOCgM

Huh, how much can I sell my R1600

>3900X beats 7980XE in both single and multicore

Attached: 1542027477262.png (807x745, 205K)

this is literally unintelligible

Having that many cores doesn't benefit gaming performance.
Still
>$480 CPU (9900k) is only 14% faster than $330 CPU (3700x) in a CPU bound scenario

AMD is super cheating on the 3900x. In 2 cases it uses more than the fucking 9900k. Compared the 2700x, which still cheated a little, it's almost 50% higher. We're going to be seeing 200W power draw in certain workloads

thank you

Attached: 1553043760420.jpg (960x640, 92K)

how did you got it?

Reddit, as any worthwhile Jow Forums user would:

reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/c9g8hq/3900x_and_3700x_review_from_pcgh_german/

>no overclock yet
>RAM is 3200 stock.

This is going to be epic.

forum-3dcenter.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=586831&page=436
from this thread.

reddit of course

These are literally 720p gaming benches
LAMO

Attached: file.png (878x280, 105K)

I wonder how much faster the 3800 turns out to be

yes and?

That's the only thing incel care about.

Why OP cropped the benches in low resolution?
Link: imgur.com/a/YkoOCgM#Els9aDX

Gaming-Benchmarks (Min FPS) between 65W 3700X and unlocked 9900k:

RotTR 9900K 8% faster
FC5 9900K 16% faster
Wolfenstein 2 9900K 4% slower
AC: O 9900K 3% slower
Cities Skylines 9900K 4% slower
KC: Deliverance 9900K 9% slower

So in 4 out of 6, games the 9900K is slower. This is very similar to the AMD marketing graph. The German independent benchmark confirms AMD's marketing slides so go ham and shill it.

first two games are older games that were developed pre- ryzen. for context.

the i5's are dead.

>Single threaded 3700X and 3900X cant break 210
God damn it. At least it means the 3800X is a waste of money.

thank you user. OP is sucking big dicks while you did the right thing

back to /v/

where do u see KCD i can't find the pic anywhere

Blurry bullshit is a hoax. Get fucked op

Attached: 1507158917074.png (645x729, 11K)

forum-3dcenter.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=12039828#post12039828

Do you guys think a 3600 for 100 bucks will be feasible by 2020?

Attached: 1549657989635.png (512x479, 275K)

any got 3600 v 9600k benchmarks?

You see it in the tabs , the actual graph isn't saved but some other user got the numbers from the German forum (actually he probably just copied it from a reddit comment).

>No overclocking
>No temperatures
PCGH, I expected better. This is 65W vs 100W+

>that 9900k minimum fps
Jesus fucking christ

If you're a little boy, your big sister will get one for you.

Attached: D-Mm3oxU0AAqU1N.jpg (848x1200, 159K)

SINGLE CORE DOESNT MATTER
HOLY SHIT KEEP AN EYE OUT FOR twitter.com/FPiednoel
HE'S GONNA DO A FLIP ON JULY 7TH
TOP KEK
AMD REALLY FUCKING DID IT

Attached: 4c 4ever.png (641x345, 33K)

those numbers are different from the slides posted

9900k wins in WF2 too
that german guy from the forum is talking shit

Jow Forums i have a confession to make:
i actually like the looks of this RAM and would certainly buy it IF THEY'D REMOVE THE FUCKING NAME ON THEM RREEEEEEEEEEEEE

He's talking about min fps not max fps.

And the coping begins.
Sunday cannot come soon enough.

Attached: 1482121670015.png (241x245, 10K)

>min fps
but intcels and shill reviewers don't care abotu those, they will still shill the 9900k

>3700x same single core as 3900x
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

>3.6ghz 9900k
>2666 ram
>it still wins
it's like we didnt warn you zen2 will be shit

expect to see FC5 720p benchmarks spammed for the next year

Attached: 1490322382161.png (512x424, 285K)

3700x is $329 while 9900k is $485 you stupid faggot

>less than 2% difference between 3700x and 9900k in single threaded cinebench

Attached: 1558295656644.jpg (816x404, 131K)

oh look it's the baseclock retard again

>benchmarking a high end CPU in games that were meant to run on an original PS4

It's just getting sad at this point

Attached: 1526612452424.jpg (596x790, 68K)

>games don't matter!

>3.6ghz
You're mentally ill. Not memeing.

They literally don't, zoomer.

>it DOES boost to 5Ghz but its not 5Ghz on all cores
>advertised RAM speed on the box
>performs the same at double the power draw
call it a win Inteljeet, i don't care

Attached: 1479002418319.jpg (500x375, 26K)

>9900k 2667mhz ram
>3900x 3200mhz ram
It's not even normalized.

Guess 3200 MHz is probably good enough. There's some on offer where I'm at (Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8GB), so I might just buy it already now. It's CL16 though.

It's at stock settings. Anything above 2666mhz is oc on intel platform.

Please be gentle to intoddlers with buyers' remorse.

Attached: debiru side.png (309x286, 71K)

I'm gonna bet your hynix crap wont even make the advertised speeds.

better get that $20 insurance before you overclock!

there are two different 9900K (same specs) results on the Cinebench graph

Attached: Untitled.png (630x907, 713K)

What would you suggest? After the NAND factory fuckery there isn't much time left to get cheap memory.

>6 games
>only 3 posted
Fucking faggot

Samsung B-Die or bust. Get the Flare X's.

one says 95w

One is with the advertised 95W limit.
The other is automatically overclocked since Intel only ever sends motherboards to journalists that ignore the 95W limit.

Games only matter if Intel is winning....

cool, now post F1 2018, BFV and Far Cry New Dawn

DOES IT LOOK LIKE I KNOW WHAT A JAY PEGG IS???

This, but just avoid hynix m-die which is anything that isn't consecutive latencies. (e.g. anything not CL16-16-16-36 & CL16-18-18-38).

The krauts didnt save all the graphs, you need to speak the mother-tongue to understand the figures spouted by the few who actually read the article when it was up.
Take the leak for what it is, a rumor. At least its not Adoredtv or even another jewtuber.

>12 core ryzen beats 18 core xeon

Attached: incel.jpg (213x237, 10K)

>RotTR 8% faster
>141 vs 181 is 24%
amdrones with the fake news again lmao

Read the post shill it's min fps

Intards are clinically retarded, probably inbred too, retarded parents, retarded children.

Only 2 days to cope.

Attached: tumblr_ma9kj4gxuQ1r17htr.gif (500x375, 398K)

There's basically zero reasons to consider Intel at this point.
It's going to be a total holocaust in couple of days.

>There's basically zero reasons to consider Intel at this point.
except gaming, reliability, latency, ecosystem, cost saving, brand recognition, compatibility, etc

Attached: stock-photo-portrait-of-a-beautiful-young-girl-with-long-blond-hair-502811416.jpg (1137x1600, 591K)

>720p benches in (current year)
WTF GERMANY
and i'm German, too.

WHAT THE FUCK are you doing pcgh, are these benchmarks for indian pc cafe workloads?

Only mentally ill fanboys buy Intel.

>Both 3900K and 3700K were paired with DDR4-3200
>Everything else were paired with DDR4-2667 or 2933

Attached: 1442207013836.png (838x574, 362K)