Will AMD finally be able to capture (some of) the OEM market with zen 2?

Get a job. The enterprise desktop/thin client/laptop market is probably the biggest slice of pie after servers.

Until they get their shit together and offer similar remote admin and deployment options as intel, they won't. Even if their CPUs are better. People laughed at the "muh services and ecosystem" from the Intel internal discourse, but in large corporations, they really do matter. No workstation admin in his right mind would risk changing something as important as the CPU unless AMD offers a MUCH better solution.

thin clients are for faggots and shit companies like HP

Amd?
Are they even still in the CPU business?
Haven't heard of them in 10y or so

[shilling intensifies]

Attached: 20190705_195357.jpg (1440x988, 625K)

>intel
>cheaper

Attached: 1559655854160.jpg (251x242, 26K)

It can't even beat Intel's 7th gen lmao

Attached: 1562386593295[1].jpg (640x656, 43K)

Shit companies like HP spend a lot of money on thin clients so regardless of what you like they're highly relevant

The game only runs smooth at 300+ fps. Kek

>Will AMD finally be able to capture (some of) the OEM market
No. Or perhaps there is a change. It's been a few years since the last time Intel got huge fines for anti-competitive behavior for the 50th time. So perhaps they stopped locking OEMs in with contracts that say they get one price if the amount of AMD systems they sell is below a percentage of systems shipped and a much higher price if they sell too much AMD. But I doubt that's the case.

There's also one small detail when it comes to laptop's that does give Intel an advantage: Intel's got wireless, AMD doesn't. OEMs have to pay extra for a wireless chip if they go with AMD.

AMD already had a large part HP's thin clients with its semi-customs market.

>posting facts is shilling

>the Osborne myth is a fact

Then look at the steam hw survey yourself. If intel/nvidia were neck and neck with amd for years and some survey showed that the market is shifting right ahead of a major launch it might affect customer choice, yes. But amd is at ~15% market share in both cpus and gpus and has been for nearly 10 years. Informed customers, especially those looking for new parts, are aware of that and no article is going to make a dent. The only news that could change that are leaked benchmarks that show amds new lineup ahead in absolutely everything(latency, 1%s, 0.1%s, temps while being 100 bucks cheaper).

>Intel
>faster & cheaper
pick one you baiting slimy shekelchaser

informed customers wouldn't have or consider pozzed housefire garbage to begin with

Or customers that are simply result oriented. You know, buying the best tool for the job, usually gaming. The kind that doesn't give a rats ass about synthetic benchmarks but simply wants to build a rig that does 1440p, high fps, max setting without feeling like they are sitting next to a turbine.

a diseased CPU for a diseased delusional brain... perfect match.

you got a lot of issues

It's already powering Microsoft's next vidya console so probably, cheap and effective is usually the goto for mass production stuff.

>We can literally not afford to take your free CPUs
Imagine history repeating like that

>The 9700k can't even beat the 7700k when it comes to minimum FPS.
The absolute state and city of Intel.

Attached: 1556933677246.gif (200x182, 1.45M)

Majority of the steam's userbase has laptops or bestbuy prebuilts which is predominately intel/nvidia, or it's chinks playing from pccafes, which is also intel/nvidia. Amd has better share in custom pcs(still worse though), but custom built pcs are the drop in the bucket.