is google allowed to do this?
isnt this an invasion of privacy?
Is google allowed to do this?
>outside in a public place
>invasion of privacy
>it's completly legal to take photos ov someone without their permission.
What shithole country do you live in where this is legal?
Next year we'll start to see
>Select all squares with crimes
And after a couple years Google will roll out AI police drones. Then they'll probably flag anyone who's black because Jow Forums will have quietly been training it that it isn't okay to be black.
Yet it still will be super effective
95% of the world.
You guys might not have noticed but the Google AI actually avoid legit grey areas, like windows that don't look like they have the blinds drawn.
yo, i don't care about laws; if you take a picture of me, you're getting shot
Based.
Is a single picture worth going to prison over?
Well, look who's not getting invited to Christmas dinner.
she got some nice malones if ykwim
>she
user...
I'm glad I don't live in an authoritarian dystopia where the government controls something as harmless as photography.
cringe and bluepilled
redpilled
Stupid fags. You have no privacy in public.
is this that squarepusher guy that was in Aphex Twins music video?
all of our privacy went out the window long ago, more so than invasion of privacy, Im concerned that we are willingly helping to train AI to recognize these things, cars, people, stores, crosswalks. are we training smart cars? My thought is dont willingly give up anything, but then im also willing to compromise my belifes to shit post on a shit site.
>invasion of privacy
OK, tell me ONE thing about this person beside a physical description. Who is she? What is her job? Age? address? Anything?
Yeah, who cares.
>ov
Based
Hahahahahahahaha
>is google allowed to do this?
they think they can
>isnt this an invasion of privacy?
100%. which is why i've had several properties removed from google maps/earth. all you see now of my place is a blur.
No expectation of privacy in public
Face is also blurred
I've been solving audio captchas and replacing some words with nigger, it just works like the old text one
The people can decide at any point what privacy is acceptable in public or not. The courts are slaves to the will of the people and if the people decide Google is infringing on our privacy it is our obligation to dismantle Google by force and to imprison their CEOs and try them for treason.
>What shithole country do you live in where this is legal?
Earth.
When you are in public, you are in public.
>yo, i don't care about laws
>What shithole country do you live in where this is legal?
>isnt this an invasion of privacy?
You talk a lot about laws you don't care about.
Wrong. It's illegal to take pictures under peoples skirts in public in certain situations. The meme "in public" needs to die. The people will decide what is and what isn't acceptable in public.
cute
Reminder these are the people who say liberals are freedom hating cucks because they want to ban guns
>if you ban guns that means no one has guns
Kill yourself retard.
because under a women's skirt isn't public