The 9900K still reigns supreme as the gaming king!

>paying triple for the same performance

OH NO NO NO NO

C O P E
O
P
E

Attached: 1562504849425.png (1920x1080, 1.38M)

Attached: untitled-1.png (712x565, 23K)

LAMO@a more pricier proc unable to match the 9900k @stock

pathetic...

LMAO @AYMMMMD garbage

Because 1440p 144hz is the standard in 2019, and it matters less about CPU at that resolution and more about GPU

What matters is the lowest framerate, not the highest or average. Who cares about peak framerates if you get drops. Your own post proves that Intel is better than ADM in that respect with the i7-9700k being the best.

until you turn on single process
lets go 720p gang!

you sound like a hyper good goy

This is horrible bait.
It is also incorrect.

Goy, thank you for posting the required message! Here's your 2 shekels!

Whether it's bait or not, it's most certainly not incorrect. All reviews agree that Intel still smokes AMD for gaming in the vast majority of titles.

9900k isn't even that much better than the 8700K in terms of gaming. Literally was going to upgrade, but looks like my 8700k still isn't phased by any game.

>Intel still smokes AMD
Easy there, it's 4%.

No, they don't.
Look at the fucking reviews. The 3700X matches the 9900K (IN BOTH SINGLE CORE AND MULTI CORE PERFORMANCE), and there's the 3800X and 3900X to worry about. Can you fucking kill yourself already?

it's another holocaust alright... but for AYMMDrones

It changes once you apply the patches, which you really should.

its afraid

Attached: 1558924719511.jpg (339x435, 43K)

Cinebench is not a game. Are you amdtards this retarded?

looking at the anandtech.com/show/14605/the-and-ryzen-3700x-3900x-review-raising-the-bar benchmarks the 9700k is actually great price considered. the 9900k over, rip.

What's the point when it's only marginally better for gaming than a 9600k and at higher TDP?

Attached: gaming.png (759x271, 144K)

correction, 100$ 9400f

The question is where are the those 15% price cuts from Intel

They don't need them now that Zen 2 has proven to be Another Massive Disappointment. I think Intel were genuinely worried that these were going to take the performance crown, but they didn't - so there's really no need to start slashing prices.

I got a $500 9900k and a $700 AW3418HW I am very happy playing games in 21:9 1080p at 160hz.

>1080p

Attached: a6bd5172452730877a6adc84c0b6dcaf.jpg (400x386, 23K)

Tfw when I'm rocking

>a 9900k
>a 2080ti
>a 400hz monitor

And I'm gaming exclusively in 720p. I knew Intel would come through for me, they always have! Gaming crown: retained.

Attached: 1500365858971.jpg (910x1015, 218K)

The 9900k is still the king of gaming but it got destroyed in synthetic and real life workload benchmarks.

There's no point buying a 3700X if the 9900k has a 15% price cut.

good damn right brother

Attached: fgsg.png (1302x688, 73K)

>They don't need them now that Zen 2 has proven to be Another Massive Disappointment
this...
in fact they could upp the 9900k to 750 USD and still be priced correctly

lamo... never seen such a piece of shit cpu, even beats poodozer

LIKE HOLY FUGGGG

Attached: 1550853564233.png (645x773, 12K)

still number one baby

Attached: fgfhn.png (1326x700, 64K)

I hope you enjoy those 5 extra fps user!!1!11

Should have unironically bought a 9900k on release (for gayman)

>ruins your framerate
480p minimum quality, or you're not a REAL gamer

Attached: 345346.jpg (882x758, 324K)

>king of gaming
* in 720p

>we should test CPUs under resolutions that bottleneck GPUs so that Ryzen's weakness doesn't show!

Attached: b.jpg (558x614, 18K)

wow i wish i had 160 units of gaming performance

101 max temp lol what the fuck is he cooling it with, a rock taped to the chip?

this:

We tried to warn you. JUST WAITing for AMD never pays off. They never deliver.

>average dont matter
cope

Isn't the i9 9900K like twice the price of those though?

No doubt Intel top end dominates as always, but hitting that balance of price around the mid-high end region that Jow Forums and reddit seems to love, you'd go with Ryzen right?

t.poorfag
COPE
O
P
E

Yes AMD wins price/perfomance obviously, but here we had AMDrone shills for months going on about how Zen 2 is going to take over Intel's top. In reality they've shit themselves.

Yup. Heck should have even bought the 8700k long before that when it was affordable and it's pretty much the same shit ocd

>What matters is the lowest framerate, not the highest or average.

This is true. Framerate drops are what determine the user experience.

>no difference at all in any workload you might to actually want to run today
>will perform better when cpu becomes the bottleneck in the future as games will support more cores at that point

in the meantime, enjoy your five extra fps at 720p

Attached: file.png (1200x669, 888K)

>REEEEEeee we shouldn't test actual CPU performance in CPU benchmarks!

The absolute state of AMDrones

Attached: dd.png (213x237, 9K)

The 9900K costs less than the 3900X. AMD can't even hide behind price at this point.

AMD: Gaming doesn't matter!

Where are all the shills posting 3600 fake shit?

>AMD can't even hide behind price at this point.
Zen2 will be the entire unraveling of AYMD's we of lies, screencap this

Intel's execs are currently partying with coke and hookers

*web

>I CARE ABOUT WINNING FORCED SYNTETHIC BENCHMARKS THAT DONT REFLECT ANY REAL SCENARIO WITH +1% BECAUSE I BET ON THE WRONG HORSE

Intlels everyone.

Attached: index.jpg (200x200, 6K)

Zen 2 is a good product as expected and will sell ok, the problem is AMD and their shills have massively overhyped it like their always do for AMD products.

>can reach 60 on 2160p
>can reach 120 on 1440p
>can reach 144 on 1080p
ummm sweetie, why are you complaining again?

LOL this much AMDrone denial of the simple fact that Ryzen is slower (significantly most of the time and not 1% like the mindless drone suggests)

>clock for clock
>AMD STILL loses
>3200Mhz, CL14 RAM TOO

Attached: amdsucksdick.jpg (2560x1440, 305K)

>2160p

Attached: bb3b8bdd101a19d72c8a67e16a73c3881df81bdfr1-380-349v2_00.jpg (380x349, 26K)

say it with me:
>inferior to the entire intel lineup

Attached: 1490919024434.jpg (1242x2571, 593K)

>btfo by a 50$ 2700x

the absolute state of AYMD

>3200 CL14

Attached: 1491030020848.jpg (250x250, 11K)

* at 720p

AMD Niggers always parrot about >muh RAM SPEEDS

>RAM SPEEDS DON'T MATTER

atmospheric games like total war, cities skylines and slower paced fps like farcry is best played at 4k my friend

Attached: 255710_screenshots_20181015210252_1.jpg (3840x2160, 1.39M)

...

>farcry

Attached: 65d.png (434x327, 32K)

>he doesn't like to roam around the appalachian and kill wild life and junkies

Attached: 1558020945184.gif (307x212, 587K)

It's ogre

Attached: btfo.png (818x384, 88K)

the 3600 is pretty damn cheap over here actually. prolly the go to gayman chip unless going balls out

>9900 higher than 9900k

WHY IS NOBODY TESTING THE 3800X

Attached: FB7DAD9C-6627-4478-ACAB-9A1E9A4B7470.jpg (495x362, 30K)

>average dont matter
It doesn't. 90% of the time in CS:GO is spent setting up your position etc. Nobody cares if you have 600 fps during this time, what matters is your framerate while multiple smokes are up, molotovs are burning and everyone is spraying their guns.

Attached: HTzc.png (667x465, 37K)

AMD destroys Intel in everything but niche gaming. When are Intel going to catch up? Sorry OP, I know you live in a bubble populated entirely by video games, crappy TV shows like game of thrones and celbrity youtubers, but some of us actually need our computers to do real work that has value to the world, not just consume endlessly

>7nm vs 14nm
>AMD can literally have double the performance
>Can only trade blows

Embarrassing

Because it's infected with digital AIDS and will kill your computer. Nobody wants that.

>AMD destroys Intel in Adobe applications

Oh I am laffin

>Intel's 10nm vs Intel's 14nm
>Intel cannot reach old clock rates
>Will ship 14nm and 10nm parts simultaneously because the only real advantage of the 10nm parts is better integrated graphics
Embarrassing

Attached: tsmc-intel-xtor-comp-16-10-7.png (909x919, 86K)