INTELBROS HELP HOW DO I DEFEND THIS

INTELBROS HELP HOW DO I DEFEND THIS

Attached: 1562508633959.png (1084x587, 232K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/z3aEv3EzMyQ?t=435
youtu.be/PT0EUXRGMjo?t=720
youtu.be/IDyNDMzIC-Q?t=217
images.idgesg.net/images/article/2019/07/ryzen_9_3900x_csgo_19x10_gtx_1080-100801145-orig.jpg
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Intel is an idea, a way of life. I'm not going to give up my way of life and neither should you. Hold strong brother

kek that's a good one

why does the 3900x perform worse when it has a higher max clock

Could be about the CCX switches.
3700X has only 1 cluster of 8 cores.

all those cores needed just a for a slight improvement.

Intel does more with less.

youtu.be/z3aEv3EzMyQ?t=435

Why is Windows such shit?

bruh

3900x has two chiplets with 6 cores each.

A CCX is 4 cores.

3700x has two CCXs

THIS CANT BE HAPPENING
WE SPENT SO MUCH MONEY ON... INVESTING... IN STUFF...

Attached: 1559058574624.png (640x360, 172K)

That's some good sophism.

Oh yea true but 3900X has 4 CCXs. That could explain something.

why does the 3900X looks like shit in every benchmark?

I don't know.
Is your problem with the name?

There's actually still a bug with Windows scheduler

That's the only game that AMD actually wins. They get BTFO in the rest. Also, why is the 3700x beating the 3900x?

>6%
>150$ more
>BTFO

Attached: relative-performance-games-1920-1080.png (500x1250, 81K)

*there is a bug with math

Attached: 1537684966815.jpg (444x464, 105K)

Attached: fuckin_mint.jpg (640x624, 43K)

you know the /v/ermin would get the 9700K where 5% more performance for 20% more doesn't seem so bad

>Trust amdshilltips
9900k goes well over 600 on average in csgo
so nothing to defend

have cope

lol everyone of these I've seen has been a diferent image, Intel are so cucked, can't wait to buy a 3700X

>only game where amd wins
incel cant even do 300fps in siege

Attached: siege300.png (1679x835, 505K)

We can't. It's over, bro. We had a good run but it's time to bow down to AMD.

+the cost of a CPU Cooler

WEW

This better not be that fucking garbage ulletical benchmark.
Maybe try some real world benchmarks first.
>also lower 1% lows
kek.

>

Attached: muhpricetoperformancePOOZEN.jpg (2560x1440, 546K)

3700X seems pretty based.

2600 still based. Will wait on 3600 graph though.

Outdated game engine benchmarks are irrelevant in the real world.

and you'll be GPU limited unless you're running a 2080 Ti

Yeah, CS:GO only uses 4 Cores as well!
Interesting that while Intel has better per-core, AMD pulls out ahead in this one. Must be more at play here.

My 8700K from shit ton of time ago basically. But shipped with a cooler worth less than 40 bucks.
I feel bad for anyone that has been holding up until this point for this. Only to get cucked even more Q4 2019 when Intel comes with their refresh + price drops

I waited in the 8700k, regret not getting it.
Pulled a 9900k, Ryzen benchmarks out, not regretting it at all.

Depends on the game. Competitive players don't run high resolutions & settings which will remove the GPU bottleneck in an overwhelming majority of games.

I cant beleive you guys hyped this processor for gaming for 2 years for 10% gains for the same price

Attached: 1560984249969.jpg (1335x2000, 347K)

>1080p Very High
useless benchmark
Intel is still the king of 640x480 Very Low

interesting minimum frames there

>183 mins
Yeah I'd take even the 3700X instead.

this. i was pretty dissapointed.

>linus tech tips
youtu.be/PT0EUXRGMjo?t=720
youtu.be/IDyNDMzIC-Q?t=217
images.idgesg.net/images/article/2019/07/ryzen_9_3900x_csgo_19x10_gtx_1080-100801145-orig.jpg

Attached: csgo.png (720x378, 79K)

have cope

Attached: 1561009553146.png (1900x900, 19K)

>1440p
gpu limited lmao

>3 other sources

>the length between 20 and infinity is the same as 15 to 20
What did he mean by this?

What does this have to do with videogames?

>steves 3900x died during the review
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

That's at stock and even a 8700k is better. $70 more two years ago.

he overvolted it like a tard
pic related

Attached: 1574878625165.png (1016x574, 11K)