GitHub removed the DeepNude repo and its forks. user why are you still using GitHub? It's cucked beyond belief

GitHub removed the DeepNude repo and its forks. user why are you still using GitHub? It's cucked beyond belief.

Attached: 404.png (669x460, 186K)

Other urls found in this thread:

catbox.moe
notabug.org/RemixDevs/DeezloaderRemix
files.catbox.moe/ljhvf0.zip
files.catbox.moe/lsom97.zip
github.com/stacklikemind/deepnude_official
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git#Git_server
sankakucomplex.com/2009/01/07/20-years-for-loli-manga-victims-dont-have-to-exist/?pg=X
gogs.io/
about.gitlab.com/install/
git.zx2c4.com/cgit/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

anyone got a copy I can Internet Archive

I used github throughout university because that's what everyone used. Would putting them on my own hosted server on a resume throw employers off? I already have a job but I'm just thinking ahead to the next one

Not sure about the github version but the cracked version of the app was already up on pirate bay days ago.

yes recruiters are dumb

my projects I mean

Pandora's box is open. Fuck censorship, private or public.

fucking wimps

>user why are you still using GitHub?
Exposure

>It's cucked beyond belief.
I tend to keep my programming projects separated from my political ideology and views. Mixing them seem to be what tranny SJWs do, and I don't think it's a good idea.

>political ideology
DeepNude had no political ideology.

I have all of the github versions, the main and some fork with the libs required...

Attached: file.png (703x275, 14K)

good you filthy degenerates

Attached: 1562369539797.png (300x297, 230K)

If it's something like gitlab maybe not. If you are using cgit or something similar, yeah it will fuck you over. Recruiters are actually brain dead.

depends what kind of jobs. for "looking for a code ninja warrior" jobs, yeah no github might be bad. If you dont have good enough history to call the shots, just play the game everyone else plays.

Github should never be a primary repo anyway. thats like using youtube to save your videos...

I'm talking about boycotting Github as a political statement/retaliation for removing something you liked.

catbox.moe

upload and share here

Retard developers, they should know what comes next after uploading shit like this on github, notabug.org would be a better bet since projects like this can be there:
notabug.org/RemixDevs/DeezloaderRemix
This is about uncucked alternatives to github now, post'em

Attached: b06ff1c4d23b94c08576330705190ae8-imagejpeg.jpg (1397x988, 133K)

>blank page on tor
the libs are 700mb each
files.catbox.moe/ljhvf0.zip
files.catbox.moe/lsom97.zip

Since they were a legal release on github I'll share the .zips from github though

Thank you grats.

no prob buddy
check
idk which one is which, but one of them has a "checkpoints" folder and that is the one that had the README Info on the .lib files

Everybody hates people just looking for some good porn

F for respects

github.com/stacklikemind/deepnude_official

I'm glad they did I'm against this whole DeepFake stuff incl DeepNude. These things are the opposite of freedom which Git sites are supposed to represent.

>censorship is freedom
durrrr

Attached: 28A68DB0-8331-406D-9A45-70BEA79B1671.jpg (480x480, 32K)

People are too stupid to see the censorship issue, they're just play the OMG UR A PERVERT JLAW NUDES JLAW RAPE!!! angle.

Github is not a free speech platform though. We can discuss whether or not that's problematic, but it wasn't conceived as it to begin with. I'm not so concerned with the lack of free speech on for example github, because there are more than enough alternatives for hosting code and projects. I'm much more concerned with the silencing of voices on other platforms, such as facebook, twitter and youtube.

>These things are the opposite of freedom
cendorship is freedom

retard

>the right to manipulate images and harass someone is freedom

>right to manipulate images
is indeed freedom
>implying harassment
man you're really plugged into the tumblr SJW machine

Attached: B9B79032-7FFC-4D54-820E-7833AF27031C.jpg (638x1000, 74K)

>manipulating pictures is freedom
Good comrade

>libel and spreading images where you appear nude isn't harassment
So you'd be fine if I lifted your photo from facebook, manipulated it so it looks like you're raping a minor, and then sending it to the police and all your family and employer?

It's my freedom to do so, after all :^)

Attached: 1930s-deep-fake.jpg (630x840, 266K)

>implying spreading images
still a brainlet

imagine still using github in 2019 and not running your git server on your own host? lmao. this world is embarrassing.

>i just manipulate pictures of underaged kids to appear nude so i can fap at home
>there's nothing wrong with that!!!!1111

>running your git server on your own host
touch bagina

Attached: 1562458725259.jpg (868x958, 61K)

technically it's not worse than loli hentai

> we must protect the children!
kys, fascist. those old boogey men tactics don't work here.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git#Git_server
based fucking retard.

I agree. In many countries, loli hentai is considered illegal though.

> This private owned platform won't let me host my creepy program to make nudes of women I'll never legally see nude let alone fuck
> They're cucked
> KEKED I say
Big, big, BIG YIKES
Bigly yikes

Attached: 1523548236746.png (1000x700, 101K)

and I live in MURICA aka Freedom Land

other countries BTFO

I wanna move to gitlab but I have contributions to open source projects on github that I need to be able to show off to employers, as well as my own projects. I could just keep a copy of all my shit on github as I do stuff on gitlab but, by that point why not just use github?

Calling someone you don't agree with for "fascist" is literally SJW tactics though.

>can't call out literal fascism because SJWs do it
that's a logical fallacy

Did you just come into this thead from 2015?

ah bloo bloo think of the children, get a new line shill

>and I live in MURICA aka Freedom Land
sankakucomplex.com/2009/01/07/20-years-for-loli-manga-victims-dont-have-to-exist/?pg=X

these people are morons. what do you expect? they could host their own shit but since they're 100% clinically retarded, they have no idea how.
> it's sjw tactics
lmao. your life is a total fucking travesty if that's the best you can do, you intellectual featherweight.

SAD post! Many such cases!

Attached: 1562464008984.gif (498x359, 408K)

>the right to manipulate images
are you saying its not a right to manipulate the data on my machine?

fucking console posters

This happens without deepfakes since the internet is internet.
The moment you upload something private to internet, you're fucked.
Stop being a bitch and abstain to the consequences.

gitgud.io

>private owned platform
>yikes
This is poor bait

>masturbating to children is wrong
>OMG FASCISM!!!!!
This is you

stop shilling your alternatives and go for the obvious solution
>self-hosted

>are you saying its not a right to manipulate the data on my machine?
Do you use Windows or macOS? If yes, then your "right" is heavily conditional indeed.

it's deepnude; there are literally no victims

Someone put up a gogs or cgit or gitlab so this doesn't die

>Being against SJW fascists is being fascist!
>Being against fascists is being SJW!

See >“It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists.”

US are cucked by the PROTECT ACT of 2003

>manipulate the data on my machine
>there are literally no victims

Attached: jxbAZdG7aQ-2.png (300x250, 21K)

See

>caring about a shitty program that can't even put boobs right and that probably wont be further developed

Attached: 15429198971710.jpg (604x379, 18K)

>the right to manipulate images
Photoshop is illegal?
>harass someone
Don't upload pics of yourself roastie. Close your eyes and shut off the computer.

but they aren't children

they're midgets

>Photoshop is illegal?
Pretty sure it's part of Photoshop's EULA that creating fake CP is illegal, yes.

>Close your eyes
You do realize that the problem is other people seeing pictures, not me seeing them, right?

Some links:
gogs.io/
about.gitlab.com/install/
git.zx2c4.com/cgit/

but you won't care if you don't see them

>defamation vs some fap material
Also where'd you get the nude picture of a minor to edit me in with it?

ironically mr brainlet can't do that since CP is illegal

>but you won't care if you don't see them
If my employer sees them, I would care.

See >Also where'd you get the nude picture of a minor to edit me in with it?
I just deep nude a picture of a child, silly :^) After all, that's my RIGHT to do, isn't it?

>caring about EULA

Attached: 1488863171155.jpg (400x400, 35K)

>What other people do is a problem

Attached: b90.png (645x729, 91K)

>If my employer sees them, I would care.

dont be retarded and let your employer anywhere near your porn stash?

dont fucking let anyone near your porn stash

Attached: 1460086968866.png (720x720, 880K)

Why would your employer see them, if you don't see them?
Unless you're talking about what he looks at on his own time, in which case why would you care?

>spread lies about you to your boss so he fires you
>not a problem

This
Gitgud was set up explicitly in response to Github's retarded stunts in this vein. Pic related.

Attached: Github retardation gitgud.jpg (724x245, 54K)

>eula dictates the law
Okay bootlicker.
>other people seeing pictures,
You didn't care when you uploaded that bikini pic roastie. Only now that your only bargaining point is gone you get concerned.
Protip: if you don't want people jerking off to you then don't post pics of yourself on the internet. Literally day one rule.
But you'd need a base child model for it to work. You can't just scale down a flat chested girl. The anatomy's fucked otherwise. And if you found a girl that did match then picture evidence wouldn't be enough to convict me.
As you said I don't need deepnude to do this stuff, Photoshop is plenty capable, it just makes it easier.

genuine question. wouldn't it be easier and better to develop and train a software that does the same as deepnude but for anime/cartoon pics? there is more data that can be used to train it, drawings are much easier to edit, and it wouldn't present any kind of legal threat (except for copyrighted images). it would be the ultimate r34 generator.

Attached: 1546381576641.jpg (451x422, 48K)

>Okay bootlicker.
Good luck creating fake CP on your computer and explaining to the police that you had the right to do that :^)

>You didn't care when you uploaded that bikini pic roastie
>bikini pics are literally nudes
Go back to Syria, Hassan.

>But you'd need a base child model for it to work.
That's not a problem. Plenty of pictures of children around.

>And if you found a girl that did match then picture evidence wouldn't be enough to convict me.
Wanna bet?

yes

but that doesnt get the attention of normies

no normies == less profit

I'm pretty sure he's talking from the perspective of a victim. Having a deepnude tied to your name could be problematic.
That being said, we have the same scenario as with deepfakes, where theoretically everybody could use your pictures to ruin your life, but it's far more likely that an angry ex will just leak all those nudes you sent him after knowing him only for a few weeks.

>I'm pretty sure he's talking from the perspective of a victim.
Indeed I am.

>but it's far more likely that an angry ex will just leak all those nudes you sent him after knowing him only for a few weeks.
I actually have little sympathy with "revenge porn" victims. I see the threat of deepnudes, and deepfakes in general, to be a lot more problematic, especially for future iterations. There's going to be a massive societal crisis when we no longer can trust photographic and video evidence.

Literally

>>bikini pics are literally nudes
>Teehee I'm gonna make so many guys horny with this half naked pic of me
>WTF PEOPLE ARE USING IT AGAINST ME!!!!
People who post bikini pics and then get upset when people jerk it to them have the mental capacity of a retarded ape. What happened to the assumption that anything online will have porn be made of it?
>That's not a problem
Okay pedo. I'm sure you have plenty of non generated nudes of children.
>Wanna bet?
That's falsification of evidence. No one's gonna convict you for being naked on the internet.
>Hmm doesn't matter because I'll just commit actual felonies to prove my point on why something entirely different is

My argument for being little sympathetic towards revenge porn victims vs deepnude victims is that the latter did not intend to actually share any sexually arousing pictures at all and anyone could make them, contra an angry ex where you yourself make a poor character judgement by trusting someone else.

>There's going to be a massive societal crisis when we no longer can trust photographic and video evidence.
im sorry

what fucking crisis could arise when we cant trust digital nudes of people?

Attached: 1485468316485.jpg (700x388, 47K)

>People who post bikini pics and then get upset when people jerk it to them
If you read my posts, I don't have a problem with people jerking off to bikini pics at all. The problem is when you MANIPULATE those images to create an entirely different context.

>Okay pedo. I'm sure you have plenty of non generated nudes of children.
Why would I need non-generated pictures, when manipulated pictures work just fine? You know you can manipulate a picture of you into an already manipulated picture, right?

>That's falsification of evidence
You literally claimed that we have the right to do that.

>No one's gonna convict you for being naked on the internet.
People in Iran and Saudi-Arabia literally get beheaded or hanged for that, so you are fucking retarded if you can't extend your narrow little scope from "lol butthurt roasties" and see the global implications of being able to manipulate pictures of political adversaries etc.

>look, here's photographic evidence that Joe Biden literally rapes a little girl
>"hah, can't be trusted! anyone can generate that kind of picture"

didn't know about it. looks as promising as deepnude, but apparently deepnude's controversy scared the dev and made him keep a low profile

your argument is flawed because that technology already exists

its called photoshop you dipshit

digital forensics is a thing and we can tell when a picture has been manipulated

too bad you cant photographically edit some brain cells into your skull

Let's ban pencils and paper because they can be used to create CP

You could train it on some vidya game with nude mod and realistic graphics.

>You literally claimed that we have the right to do that.
You have the right to manipulate for your enjoyment, not for the presentation of evidence in the court of law.
>People in Iran and Saudi-Arabia literally get beheaded or hanged for that
Literally who cares? They can behead every women and child so they die out in 30 years for all I care. Any society that allows for that shit to occur doesn't have the right to exist in the first place.
>The problem is when you MANIPULATE those images to create an entirely different context.
What's the problem? If you don't want people to fuck with your shit then don't post it online in the first place. Again day 1 internet stuff. Maybe people should be more cautious of what they upload.

Anyone can manipulate images. This just makes it faster.

We're already there. And we can also pretty to very convincingly simulate spoken words with the accompanying mouth movements, so Joe Biden can also spout plans to rape more kids and admit murder while he does that.

The only problem is that society doesn't understand it yet.

Attached: 1561168797931.jpg (500x500, 58K)

>your argument is flawed because that technology already exists
>its called photoshop you dipshit
It's not impossible to distinguish between a photoshopped image and a real image.

>digital forensics is a thing and we can tell when a picture has been manipulated
You clearly don't understand the potential in AI generated images.

>There's going to be a massive societal crisis when we no longer can trust photographic and video evidence.
The thing is, I here that argument for almost two years now, ever since deepfakes first became popular. It baffles me. What happened to the old rule to always be wary of watch you see on the internet?
Photos and videos were never really trustworthy. I'd even say that old manipulation techniques are still far more effective to produce quality fakes. They only require more work and experience.

>GitHub removed the DeepNude repo and its forks. user why are you still using GitHub? It's cucked beyond belief.

Attached: 1562398473776.jpg (785x2493, 310K)

>It's not impossible to distinguish between a photoshopped image and a real image.
It's not impossible to distinguish between a shitty deepnude and a real nude image

>You clearly don't understand the potential in AI generated images.
you clearly dont understand that digital manipulation will never be perfect to not leave detectable artifacts of image manipulation

>You have the right to manipulate for your enjoyment, not for the presentation of evidence in the court of law.
I'm not talking about the court of law, I'm just talking about sending it to your friends and family and colleagues.

>Literally who cares? They can behead every women and child so they die out in 30 years for all I care. Any society that allows for that shit to occur doesn't have the right to exist in the first place.
Good job dodging the issue entirely instead of addressing the point. I see I'm talking with a real intellectual here.

>What's the problem? If you don't want people to fuck with your shit then don't post it online in the first place. Again day 1 internet stuff. Maybe people should be more cautious of what they upload.
It's not only what I upload myself, people have literally used deepfake on surveillance camera videos.

>You clearly don't understand the potential in AI generated
Yes because clearly AI is magic and will beat every current and future digital forensic technique to identify it.