Why is the FOSS community such a bunch of hypocrites? They created an open, decentralized platform and now they want to close and censor it because Gab joined the Mastodon network.
Why are FOSS users so fragile? Can't they figure out how to stick to their principles instead of wanting to sabotage their own communities when so called "Nazis" rightfully establish their own node in the decentralized network?
Have you not seen the rampant tranny fetishism on this board? They're all balding, blue haired retards LARPing as important enough to worry about 'big brother', and then ironically become the thing they fear in the name of 'freedom'. It's a bunch of schizos creating a feedback loop. Just keep walking, user, they'll bring back sanitariums to deal with this level of degeneracy.
some of the admins have blocked gab and kiwifarms. some of them haven't.
personally, i block nazis on an individual level. it takes one click to block a nazi, and it takes them about twenty to create a new alt, so i see it as a win.
>some fuckers do shit > why is the foss community... don't look at me like that
but the article clearly states gab is permitted, though it also states a bunch of weird shit like mastodon "promising to keep out the hateful or ugly content that proliferates on larger and more centralized networks" which i've never heard before
The whole point of the fediverse is that you can choose what instances you want to federate with. Freedom means you can choose who you want to listen to. Ignoring someone isn't censorship.
Why are you posting this nonsense polemic on a chinese cartoon porn website which is already a containment zone for sexual degenerates?
>Just fuck off to Jow Forums, nigger Semi-confused now does Jow Forums accept niggers now?
> I believe in freedom until my feelings get a boo boo.
If you don't like something, you block it, mute it, or just dont look at it. You don't get to claim muh freedom and act all techno-libertarian but then go full authoritarian on ideas you don't like.
Mastodon cant do shit. They can cover the eyes of their snowflake users but that's it.
That's exactly what they're doing though. The software is free, gab has already forked it to remove the blocks.
There's a simple answer to this.
Create MOAR NAZI NODES. Until they outnumber the non-nazi nodes. Once this happens, the jews behind mastodon will commit sudoku.
>but the article clearly states gab is permitted except other nodes are blocking gab instead of just telling their users to block people individually
Rightist propaganda should be censored.
>The whole point of the fediverse is that you can choose what instances you want to federate with. That's up to the users, not the node operators. Imagine if jabber.net blocked 404.city or another huge node.
That would be within their rights to do that if another node was flooding them with russian bots spewing hate speech.
People who advocate against free speech should be be disappeared by the CIA.
>r000t weren't you that guy that spammed 7chan like 8 years ago? I feel like I recognize that name from there.
>if I have the right to do something that makes it moral
>Create MOAR NAZI NODES. Until they outnumber the non-nazi nodes. This. We already outnumber them so we should just take over Mastodon even more. Unlike them, we won't censor them. They can talk about their fake vaginas all they want. They will just block us per user if they don't want to hear our laughter.
>Rightist propaganda should be censored. Typical FOSStard logic. Stallmanites always say this.
I support this. The fediverse should be where hacker culture goes next. And this means making the wokists irrelevant.
>That would be within their rights to do that if another node was flooding them with russian bots spewing hate speech. Nobody is flooding anybody. The Mastodon node is full of users that think Nazis should be removed from an open, free, and libre network just because of their feefees.
Yes it does. Reminder that naziism is immoral.
Those users are correct in thinking that. They should be removed. Nazis are by definition, a violent hate group, they don't belong on the internet, they belong in jail. There may very well be violent hate groups on the mastodon node too, they also should be in jail.
>naziism is immoral. You don't even know what Nazism is. If anything, it is more moral than SJWism.
Your ideology is immoral because you want to flood the world with your SJW bullshit. At least we would allow you to do your SJW in your own part of the world. You don't want anybody to be normal anymore. We want your people to leave our lands and leave our children alone. You want to change our lands and corrupt our children.
Stay on your side of the fence, SJW.
Rights are freedoms, if you're free, you're free do do evil. If I own the Louvre and decide to burn every piece of art there it's my right. Doesn't make my conduct moral.
>a violent hate group Antifa is more deserving of that title than anybody.
This is technology, you fuck off back into your hive:
>free speech absolutist are nazis You know sometimes I wish we had the real deal around. The I remember there is a moralists totalitarian ideology floating around in the west. Would be much simpler if it was right wing.
>If I own the Louvre and decide to burn every piece of art there it's my right. Pretty sure lots of countries have laws about national treasures or whatever they decide to call them, and you go to jail for destroying them. Nice try.
I am not an SJW. I am also not here to debate what Naziism is. Stop trying to strawman me. Whoever is feeding you this victim mentality, about your lands and children being corrupted, stop reading it immediately. Save yourself, you have fallen for the lowest of the low tier Jow Forums shit troll memes. You are being preyed upon, and it's not by the SJWs.
>They created an open, decentralized platform and now they want to close and censor it because Gab joined the Mastodon network. But they can't. All of you idiots (faggots from the verge included) are making a scandal over nothing.
Laws don't have shit to do with rights. You should read Locke instead of pretending you understand moral philosophy.
nazism wasn't exactly "leave us alone and we'll leave you alone"
And that's why the opposition to woke idiots aren't nazis, but liberals.
>By Adi Robertson The writer is a Jewish woman in NYC. We've seen her before. She got rid of all her social media pictures when people posted her face everywhere.
I'm just waiting on Gab to get a userbase that does something other than spread boomer memes.
It's not your right if you go to jail for it, idiot. >b-but muh philosophy kys
Nazis wouldn't fuck you, gross tranny.
Spreading lies and inciting violence is not free speech.
It's almost... as if... wait a minute... If you deplatform the same type of behavior it will manifest itself on another platform that doesn't have the same conduct policies. This makes zero cents. So I guess it's not really... accountable?
its actually incredible how foaming at the mouth leftists become when they hear the word NAZI, but they willingly accept pedos, sex changes for 5 year olds, muslim rapists, terrorists, etc. makes you wonder if the left arent just communists repeating legacy communist chants.
>free speech >can't post anime or say NIGGER nice platform you got there
>You are being preyed upon, and it's not by the SJWs. Your hebrew handlers, yes.
Did your history teacher tell you that Germany was annexed into Poland and Germany only went in to rescue and take back their people from Communist attackers who were killing ethnic Germans who were suddenly trapped behind Polish lines after the lines drawn by the treaty of Versailles?
>Spreading lies and inciting violence is not free speech. Time to ban all the libs complaining about "concentration camps". It's LITERALLY fake news and it got people killed.
The "handlers" are the ones who have been feeding you this drivel trying to mobilize you against your own neighbors. You let it work on you. Why? Have you really just been hunting for jewish acceptance this whole time?
I'm not him, I just saw his post earlier today.
>implying I'm on the side of the censors Can you read user?
>nazis >pedos >sex changes for 5 year olds >muslim rapists >terrorist But Mastodon bans all of those things. Gab is the one that doesn't.
It literally is. That's what rights are, unalienable, can't take them away even if you violate them. Stop using words you don't know the meaning of.
>why do people keep trying to make their opponents out to be part of "the bad guys" and make themselves out to be the only method of fighting said bad guys? It's literally the most basic form of propaganda based power play, user. And the fact that it's happening on a much bigger scale than any other time in history due to the internet really shouldn't surprise you.
Totalitarian don't like their opposition speaking. News at 12.
>people have an obligation to share their platform/service with nazis and pedophiles
just reconcile with the fact that you are the lowest scum and no one wants you around, but evenso you are still free to exercise your 1st amendment rights on stormfront.org and the nambla forums
WHAT NON-GAB NODE SHOULD I JOIN IF I WANT TO FOLLOW GAB USERS WITHOUT BEING CALLED A GAB USER? WHAT NON-GAB NODE SHOULD I JOIN IF I WANT TO FOLLOW GAB USERS WITHOUT BEING CALLED A GAB USER? WHAT NON-GAB NODE SHOULD I JOIN IF I WANT TO FOLLOW GAB USERS WITHOUT BEING CALLED A GAB USER? WHAT NON-GAB NODE SHOULD I JOIN IF I WANT TO FOLLOW GAB USERS WITHOUT BEING CALLED A GAB USER? WHAT NON-GAB NODE SHOULD I JOIN IF I WANT TO FOLLOW GAB USERS WITHOUT BEING CALLED A GAB USER?
gab banned loli and shota porn. they also banned racism on dissenter when they tried to be allowed on google and mozilla's add-on stores
They made that choice when they picked decentralization. If pedos and nazis running around is the price of freedom, I pay it gladly. Better evil men be free than good men be oppressed.
It shouldn't matter if you only want to follow people. Pick an instance that doesn't block anyone, the tricky part is finding one that isn't blocked either. Mastodon has RSS feeds, that's how I follow people there. But, I don't plan on participating, so it's different.
it's not that they're just running around its that they wont shut up
What about IS recruiters? What about mudslimes hounding your daughters that they are haram and will be gang-raped by right-thinking mullas?
There is plenty of shit so vile that normalfags dont want it around, and for excellent reasons.
>Pick an instance that doesn't block anyone, the tricky part is finding one that isn't blocked either. Which one has both qualities?
You don't have to follow anyone. If you don't like them, mute them. What's the issue? It's not like you're forced to see anything. If your circle isn't interested in that content you won't see much of it anyway.
Can't shut free men up. Still with being able to speak.
I'll take a million shitposts before a single Twitter ban for misgendering.
I want to fuck Sakura so fucking much
Fuck normie sensibilities. Technology can't be stopped.
The world would be a better place if people took the net with a grain of salt.
Sometimes you should shut free men up because the most subversive people will constantly use their freedom of speech to mislead others
Misgendering is known to increase suicide rates >But I want them to die! I really don't mind if you get deplatformed when you fully admit to practicing psychological warfare tactics
Read On Liberty's second chapter.
You want subversives to a degree, otherwise your societies become intellectually weak, unable to remember why they allow freedom in the first place. Debating wrong ideas is not just inconvenient, it's necessary.
Yeah you want them to a degree You have to draw the line somewhere
Still my right to do it. Post better bait next time.
Still twitters right to ban you. Seethe harder pussy
Fag, people who feel "misgendered" are mental and need proper medical care. Not doing everything to their whim. Most of them do it for attention only as well.
Fuck non-normies. Jow Forums culture is fine, and should stay on Jow Forums. Moral relativism was shit when lefties did it in the 1970s and it's equally shit when nazis and pedos are doing it current year.
Popper has a good inquiry into where the line is. I agree with him that it is at violence. Not speech.
Historically clamping down on totalitarian ideas only helps them in the long run. Look at Weimar, Hindenburg was super fucking authoritarian in the end. Didn't help him.
Recommend me some good instances. I only know about Pawoo and mastodon.social (which is pure shit).
Yes. The proper treatment is to not misgender them. Using correct pronouns is not "doing everything to their whim"
>Historically clamping down on totalitarian ideas only helps them in the long run Really? You think countries in Western Europe banning Communism wasn't a good idea? Speech can be just as subversive as violence, it's just much harder to find where to draw the line
This isn't an argument. You can't stop progress.
Severely mentally ill people are prone to killing themselves. What's your point, faggot?
>if you kill your enemies they win The problem with Weimar was that it was an incompetent weak government that literally let communists and nazis roam and control the streets and let Hitler off with a slap on the hand for treason when he should have been put before a firing squad after the beer hall putsch
>Misgendering is known to increase suicide rates I should do it more, then.
unironically fuck nazis
Men is a men. Women is a women. There is no third gender. It's made up bullshit so fags feel special