WHY DON'T THEY HAVE IMAGE PREVIEWS FUCKING ADD IT GODDAMNIT IM SICK OF THIS SHIT

WHY DON'T THEY HAVE IMAGE PREVIEWS FUCKING ADD IT GODDAMNIT IM SICK OF THIS SHIT

Attached: 2019-07-15-190342_621x409_scrot.png (621x409, 57K)

lol

It's open source, bro. Add it by yourself.

use thunar

this is the file picker from a browser prompt in qutebrowser, if i could change it i would
I thought kde was good, i'm let down

Attached: IMG_20190715_201032.jpg (621x409, 81K)

>nooo i need quick access to my memes!!
use windows/mac like the rest of the children

Attached: 2019-07-15-191337_620x408_scrot.png (620x408, 62K)

Your move retard.

Attached: big_button.png (646x442, 66K)

Okay:
Ahhahahaa

OP here the way i get around it is to have a sxiv thumbnail view bound to mod + s for shitpost
sxiv -ft ~/pix/wallpapers
but it's just so goddamn annoyng to have to do this

Attached: 2019-07-15-191627_1366x768_scrot.png (1366x768, 758K)

That's not a native KDE file picker dialogue

Install KDE Plasma

> less features = good
Concession accepted.

Konqi Desktop Environment.

Attached: CopyQ.voDFcH.png (1279x1012, 369K)

It's a program you extracted from a TAR isn't it...

If you compile it yourself it will use your system file picker instead of the GTK-QT blend that is already baked in.

Attached: 1560528101661.jpg (1024x762, 144K)

nah it came with qutebrowser from the offcial repos, had this problem on 3 different distros
if you know what flags i should pass to make it use a better file picker please do share, ill compile it with no issue

>changed icon size in header file from 16px to like 64px
>acceptable thumbnails by gtk standards
>but the icons often glitched and did not render fully
>was about to post my standard complaint about the above issue
>can not reproduce it anymore

holy shit I think they patched the issue I had

Attached: gtk.png (1066x787, 128K)

it used to glitch up like this (very) often with the increased-in-size icons
I can not make it happen anymore

patch is piss easy to apply too

Attached: gtk+.png (975x789, 187K)

From 8e21740a9cc5dc1e30deefdb5bfb544d6159e1fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: looloo
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 18:14:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] applied iconsize

---
gtk/gtkfilechooserwidget.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gtk/gtkfilechooserwidget.c b/gtk/gtkfilechooserwidget.c
index d1dd2f0059..98e975bfdc 100644
--- a/gtk/gtkfilechooserwidget.c
+++ b/gtk/gtkfilechooserwidget.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ enum {
#define DEFAULT_RECENT_FILES_LIMIT 50

/* Icon size for if we can't get it from the theme */
-#define FALLBACK_ICON_SIZE 16
+#define FALLBACK_ICON_SIZE 64

#define PREVIEW_HBOX_SPACING 12
#define NUM_LINES 45
@@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ change_icon_theme (GtkFileChooserWidget *impl)
profile_start ("start", NULL);

if (gtk_icon_size_lookup (GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU, &width, &height))
- priv->icon_size = MAX (width, height);
+ priv->icon_size = 64; //MAX (width, height);
else
priv->icon_size = FALLBACK_ICON_SIZE;

--
2.19.0


laziest patch ever

Attached: milkdeliverylud.png (258x288, 138K)

2019 is the year of linux

Attached: Linuxsucks.png (750x350, 73K)

Can you drag and drop now?

That's the qt fallback dialog that is only used when the program can't for some reason open the native one. Kdialog has a proper thumbnail view.

Attached: 1562074357172.jpg (466x388, 28K)

how do you specify, in DE settings, in WM settings, in browser settings, this is garbage