NON-IONIZING RADIATION SAFE
NONIONIZING EFFECTIVE
5G GOOD
4G + LTE GOOD
WIFI GOOD
PRO-HEALTH PEOPLE ARE LUDDITE
NON-IONIZING RADIATION SAFE
Too busy wait fr 5G sry gfuize hv fun :::^^^^))))
i fucking hate hate how ""Woke"" retards focus on useless details That are proven to be incorrect and say that its a lie everything is controlled by this boogeyman while ignoring the bigger picture.
ELABORATE DUDE I KNOW THAT WIFI IS GOOD
Sneed
Fast wireless communication bad
Photons bad
bro if youve already shot me with .22 you might as well shoot me with .50 BGM HE it wont make a difference at this point
ddduuuuhhhh
uh
uuuhhh
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrruhhh
UH
UUUHHHHHHH
...
...
ddduuuuuhhhh.....
And what of him? Will you just let him be killed?
He's making his final stand as we speak.
WIRES GOOD
DDUUUHHH
IRRADIATING MY WITH MICROWAVE OVEN FREQUENCY GOOD
MAXIMUM DIELECTRIC LOSS OF WATER
MAKE WATER SPIN IN BODY
GOOD
Adapt or die.
>yfw nothing can do anything but die
hhhhhhmmmmm
I feel you man. I am a molecular biologist. Current radiations are bad enough. Not terrible but not grest either, but this 5G has almost the same frequency as UV light (almost). It will certainly be detrimental to health, but there is not much we can do about it sadly. The only study is being ignored due to technicalities, usually when thay happens, new studies are issued to get proper results but this one is being flat out ignored. There is clearly a biased hand moving the strings here.
>but there is not much we can do about it sadly.
I too live this everyday, but it's not an acceptable answer. We halt this madness and tear down existing infrastructure, or we've had it. Insect populations are collapsing, insectivores are dying in turn. The era of pollination by hand has arrived in Europe and the US. The bees etc are gone.
This is a fight for life. Whether we survive long term or not, if man fails, we're very likely going to wipe out the bulk of terrestrial life with us. People cannot wrap their head around survival at this level and the accumulation of what are invisible and, at first, subtle threats.
Check out:Data
mediafire.com
mediafire.com
Or
mega.nz
and this thread:
We need everyone armed to the teeth with hard, credible data. Study started now over 100 years ago. We know damn well what's what.
This radiation is no more harmful than a chest x-ray.
Why not both?
For which purpose you're already supposed to wear a lead jacket, yes.
Your point?
>tfw you realize they're going to get away with just killing all of us
You wanted this.
>I'm pro-health
>no I'm not a doctor
>I make spurious claims regarding non-ionizing radiation and vaccines.
Reminder this is what Jow Forums schizos actually believe