>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO A PROGRAM SHOULD ONLY DO ONE THING!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO A PROGRAM SHOULD ONLY DO ONE THING!
Logan Miller
Other urls found in this thread:
Sebastian Howard
You mad kid? Did someone complain about your sub par app that does a couple of things?
John Green
a class should only do one thing
a program can do as many things as you want
Hunter Rivera
I'm a C programmer and what is this.
Anthony Thomas
>make the scope broad enough
there, it only does one thing kiddo.
Luis Edwards
> t. hello world brainlet
Caleb Myers
so what bloated shit are you using that someone called you out for?
Connor Thomas
Another post in the series of "le reddit cancer man accompanied with greentext" threads.
This shit is just as bad as "out of context twitter screenshot" threads.
I wish janitors would get off their asses and actually delete this trash.
Nolan White
>encapsulation is good in all circumstances
Get with the times, grandpa. Enjoy your untestable shitty DI system that handles your spaghetti dependency graph for you and makes your code untestable due to using code generation as a crutch.
Chad functional programming is back. Long live global scope
Lincoln Foster
Alala can't hear you..!
Mason Bell
Exactly. Because it's easier for the user and the devs that way.
OOP is garbage.
Samuel Campbell
>OOP is garbage
yes surely an entire paradigm of programming can be categorically discarded
Alexander Taylor
It can because it doesn't make any sense.
Asher Kelly
to brainlets maybe
Lincoln Gonzalez
it does make sense
Jeremiah Allen
It can be very easily. You conflate data and functions the wrong way and now you suddenly have a huge portability and complexity problem.
Jaxon Young
>if you dont know how to write a program it can be a problem!
>unique to OOP
Logan Adams
cringe and cancerpilled
Isaac Phillips
>let me use this convoluted DI system and enforce its use in every project instead of just taking a step back and considering that OO may be the cause of this madness
Owen Smith
No OOP is that problem, it's not the programmers fault.
Cooper Cooper
imagine actually believing this
Dylan Gutierrez
You're misunderstanding. It's fundamentally broken because OOP isn't how computers or people think or work. It's a retarded abstraction which just wastes time and effort and the only reason it exists is so that brainlets can dick around longer and get paid more for doing less real work. You're not even doing any real work most of the time because you have to worry about muh irrelevant things that aren't related to the actual problem you're trying to solve.
youtube.com
Sebastian Rogers
this always happens when people bash OOP they strawman Java specifically and talk about it turning into an intellectual circle jerk academic abstraction meme language.
Connor Diaz
What did 4channel mean by this?
Ayden Cox
this board is fucking garbage
Jackson Rogers
You take data, you put it into abstract boxes that don't know they're data, you mutate them randomly and don't follow a process, you split up the data into a bunch of different classes to extend your objects behavior complicating things immensely instead of doing something intelligent like composing functions. Object oriented programming has you writing boiler plate constantly to write your data into and out from objects when it all could have been data anyway, and they don't extend easily.
I would listen to a functional programmer like Rich Hickey (a guy who programmed in Java for most of his adult career) talk about the problems with modern programming design.
Grayson Lee
>the absolute state
Noah Moore
Lucas Torres
It's easy to trash something when you haven't built anything. It's what's wrong with Haskellcunts and Functionalcunts in general
Christopher Phillips
This shit's been studied dude this isn't even a controversial statement software today could be written way better and writing your shit into objects rather than as functions and data is perhaps the fundamental cause of that problem.
Lisp bros know this.
Lucas Foster
If only it were against the rules, protip: it's not. Jow Forums is a meme website, first and foremost. If you want serious discussion you have to find another website.
Elijah Adams
Lisp has CLOS.
Nathan Sullivan
Not as bad as animeposts.
>hurr durr anime website
It's a shitpost site too, checkmate.
Samuel Nguyen
I'm not familiar with common lisp but as a functional programming with immutability whatever it calls objects won't have all the problems.
Bentley Gomez
C# is the same shit in a worse language.
Austin Roberts
citation needed
Kayden Edwards
>his os isn't just tiny kernel, basic programs and 90% of libraries
Samuel James
after working with both I can definitively say OOP was a mistake. Functional just makes infinitely more sense, if it ain't broke don't fix it