See that CPU? You can boost it to 4.6 GHZ

Yeah he's lying with full knowledge that he's lying but gets paid for it so doesn't care while a non-paid shill even if wrong, often genuinely believes his own shit. I really don't think either one is better than the other.

Peak XFR is only ever engaged for a couple ms at a time. They try to extend it with each iteration, but its not guaranteed, since the ability to exploit that available thermal margin is also workload dependent.

Attached: amd-ryzen-1800x-xfr-presentation-slides-1.jpg (1384x773, 144K)

PINK
SQUEAKY
MARKER

BIG
PINK
COOKIE

Yet the performance is still great. Who cares about paper specs when I can buy 12 very fast cores on a mainstream platform?

>Yeah he's lying with full knowledge that he's lying but gets paid for it so doesn't care
Not necessarily. I've worked in sales-support and I've often made presentations where I had no idea re the truth or otherwise of what I was saying.
As they say: The difference between a computer salesman and a used-car salesman is the latter knows when he's lying.

Adored is on suicide watch now all his claims were btfo. Poozen cant do 5ghz

I wonder if the fake numbers were his idea or someone else's.

My 3700x goes above 4.4. Intel btfo

4.41? Amazing.

>3700x barely compete with Intel's Core-i series released in 2010s in overclocked clockspeed.

Gratz. Would you deserve a clap of two?

That pic didn't age well.

>what is IPC and clockspeed: the post

It doesn't though.

>Suddenly spew out muh IPC to distract topic centered on clockspeed

You are so obvious.

Wake me up when your 10nm reaches 5ghz.

Pls be trollan

Ghz are useful only when considering the transistor number.

You can make a CPU with 1000 transistors that hits up 7Gz without any cooling, it would be a billion times slower in all benchmarks and real world applications than any current AMD or Intel CPU, a 1.5Ghz athlon would be countless times faster than a 7Ghz I mentioned.

The clockspeeds are somewhat comparable between Intel and AMD because the transistor count is close, clock for clock ofc AMD has the advantage but AMD's don't clock as high, that's why, despite lower clocks AMD can still beat Intel even in some single core situations.

>Intel's latest pozzed flagship housefire can only compete with an FX 9590 from 2013 in terms of clockspeed
OH NO NO NO NO

Imagine being on par with the FX series...

Attached: dany.jpg (700x358, 32K)

Imagine writing all that garbage.

I wrote it, because I unironically think there are clueless people who browse this board.
Unless you think it's wrong, then you're either clueless or braindead and should kys

>You can make a CPU with 1000 transistors that hits up 7Gz without any cooling
Can you do this?

I think it was a hyperbole because generally there have been weaker CPUs that clocked higher, is the general point.

>overclock
>out of spec
>no parts named
>napkin-tier theoretical outline
>WTF MY CHIP DOES WHAT IT SAYS ON THE BOX BALD MAN LIED REEEE
Kys dumb zoomers

Shut up you piece of shit. You bought a CPU that's stuck at 4 GHz and idles at 50C and now you're trying to shit talk your way into thinking that you didn't get punked

Nobody wants to hear that shit

Give me a equipment and a lab and I will

CLOCK SPEED DOESN'T MATTER GOYIM

>4.7 ghz ? What you need 4.6 goy , i think 4.4 is enough here have a 4.3 ghz boost

>you brought up
not me, kys

I replied to this post:
>3700x barely compete with Intel's Core-i series released in 2010s in overclocked clockspeed.

Which is absolutely fucking stupid and anyone who thinks this is an argument should kys because they're a braindead shitter.

Has nothing to do with AMD or Intel, it's the sheer absolute stupidity of not understanding the simple concept of clocspeeds.
So no, I wasn't in an argument I wanted to get out, get fucked fucking brainlet shitter.

You have two choices either you concede (because it's obvious you're wrong) or move goal post to temperature and whatever the companies do or whatever.

Point is, I only replied to one point and I was right about it.
FUCKING COPE FUCKING BRAINLET PEOPLE ARE FILLED WITH TRASHWORM LIKE YOU AND I WILL ALWAYS ENJOY STEPPING ON THEM AS I SEE THEM SHIFTING GOALS AND PIVOTING AS THEY CRY

ME: STRONG
YOU: STUPID, WEAK, SLIMEY RETARD

>clock for clock ofc AMD has the advantage
Actual source on this?
Has any Zen 2 review locked the frequency to match another matching clockspeed locked current gen Intel CPU with equivalent thread count to see whose architecture is better?

Attached: Capture.png (703x454, 110K)

Yes, Zen2 is better.

Not intended to be a troll since I grew out from that phrase now.

That ego, its hurt.

While AMD's 7nm process can pack more transistors than Intel's 14nm why does AMD's processor only able to beat Intel's single core by a margin of 5% while suffered worse overclock headroom of to the extend of performance being gimp down by 20% to make it stable.

Give me a reasonable explanation or else I'll conclude that AMD made sloppy job on transistor.

Not that poster, but there's this

overclock.net/forum/10-amd-cpus/1728758-strictly-technical-matisse-not-really.html

ah yes, when intel is on bottom frequency is all that matters. when intel is on top performance is all that matters

classic incel cope in full effect

What a stupid shitter.
I don't care about AMD or Intel, I only cared about the very statement of clocks being what decides the speed of CPU

Obviously AMD fucked up and is a shit company, jesus kys you fuckig retard.

You have been such a useful idiots for companies for so long that you think everyone is a in a fucking team, KYSKYSKYSKYSKSKYSKYSKKSYKYSSYKYKSYKSYKSYKS

Thanks further Googling also found this just posted review on this very subject:
hothardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-9-3900x-vs-core-i9-9900k-ipc-shootout
>These Intel and AMD multi-core processors traded blows across all of our CPU tests, but Intel won more often than not. The blue team notched IPC wins in SANDRA's Dhrystone integer tests, Geekbench, POV-Ray, LAME MT, 3DMark, and Middle Earth: Shadow of War. AMD stole single-threaded victories in SANDRA's Whetstone FPU tests, Cinebench, and Y-Cruncher. While not an outright thread-for-thread win for AMD, the company has obviously worked hard to improve 3rd Gen Ryzen performance in lightly-threaded loads, while its multi-core scaling is downright impressive.

Attached: Capture.png (739x434, 38K)

What is this autism.
The reason AMD is so slow is because their architecture is made for EPYC, they don't want to invest money on a desktop architecture, because it would cost too much to have different archs, instead, having one arch and cutting down whatever doesn't work into inferior (threadripper, ryzen, athlon) CPUs to minimize the yield/production/etc costs.
If they arranged the arch into benefiting games this wouldn't be a problem.
Plus the TSMC's node isn't that great compared to Intel's.

Main reason AMD's CPUs are shit is because TSMC 7nm isn't that great of a node and because they are essentially tiny EPYCs, which obviously prioritizes parallel/multitask/server/etc workloads rather than singlecore/games

Fuck off. I not even have the intention to be a shitter or a shill here even in the first place. I won't care for AMD or Intel anyway.

What's in the point of starting this argument anyway.

why do you need more than 4 cores for? all you do is watch porn and play children video games

Because I get triggered when someone says something online that is obvious to me that it's wrong.
Surely there are countless things that are wrong on the internet, why would I fixate on one particular thing?
Because I can explain why it's wrong and shame the opposition.
Why?
So I feel good about myself, boost my ego, increase my self-perceived sense of status/worth, boost on test/dopamine/etc.

Most things in life are about elevating one's status, difference is that I understand it consciously, and in turn it makes me even more awesome.

I like how he's now pretending he disliked AMD for months because they played him by "leaking" 5 GHz and now he's building his own hugbox. His last video he basically complained that AMD doesn't pay him for his coverage.

I knew he was petty from how he always moans about comments, but he loves the smell of his own farts.

My praise. You sir are a sadistic bastard.

holyshit this explains ALL posts in Jow Forums.

He doesn't get to pussy out behind anonymity like the AMD fanboys on this board who believed the leaks. He has no choice but to come out and admit to the whole world that he got punked and that he was a complete faggot for even thinking that AMD could release anything that wasn't complete and utter shit.