Threadlets, when will they learn?

Attached: guaranteed replies.png (1920x1080, 1.13M)

PERFORMANCE DOESN'T MATTER

9400f is $150 retard

NOOOOOO
It's not true
Intcel is pozzed garbage stutterfire.
Intel rigged it by making the developer optimize their game for their chips.
[rambling about security patches and their supposed impact on gaming performance]

oh no no no no no NO

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
GAYMEN WAS OUR LAST DEFENSE BROS

Attached: 1534595224911.png (807x867, 343K)

based
classique 8700K worse than 9400F while having higher clocks and thread count.

OH NONONONO

>that Intel frame time

OH nonononoonono

>stutters good
The true intel experience.

*NEW games dont matter

How is that new? That's what AMDrones keep claiming since a decade

HUB are literally AMDrone central now

>9400f leads
ITS NOT THAT MUCH
>3600 leads
IT DESTROYS INTEL

Holy shit, not even the other Jewtubers are this massive shills

ONE NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

Attached: MHW.png (1373x1413, 49K)

TWO NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

Attached: CSGO.png (1373x1413, 55K)

THREE NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

Attached: re2.jpg (1016x613, 121K)

9600 doesn't have this problem. 6c is all you need for stutter-less gaming. Imagine having to synch all those threads like a dumb shmuck and induce latency.

FOUR NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

Attached: sotr.jpg (1019x606, 119K)

ONE SOMETHING'S GOT TO GIVE

Attached: PUBG.jpg (1015x578, 64K)

Are you even paid for this?

China clocked in lads. It's going to be another productive workday.

TWO SOMETHING'S GOT TO GIVE

Attached: WWZ.jpg (1019x569, 59K)

Scam benchmark. 5 GHz = 5GHz one core only. PBO+AutoOC = burnt mobo in 2 months

>PBO+AutoOC
Even AMDrones on Reddit complain these don't work properly

THREE SOMETHING'S GOT TO GIVE

Attached: 111287.png (650x450, 44K)

NOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWW

Attached: 111263.png (650x450, 39K)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IT'S ALL FAAAAAAAAAKEEEEEEE

Attached: civ VI.png (528x505, 12K)

THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING
IT'S FAKEE AAAAAAHHHHHHHHH

Attached: AC.png (526x505, 12K)

He's having a fucking stroke, somebody save him

>that bristol ridge

nice pic

Don't worry intelbro all these are obviously fake

I had an Intel CPU before I got a Ryzen 1600, and back then I had to close down my browser and other programs before playing vidya.
A few cores in excess is not a bad thing, especially when you consider that those benchmarks are always made with only the game running.

>buying just enough threads so every time a background task kicks in you dip below 40 fps

>8700k performs worse than 9400f
yep nothing wrong with this game

>2015
>you don't need the best cpu for gaming get an i5 if you want to save money.
>2019
>not enough threads nothing personal kiddo

1.6

>Concurrent programming is hard. What do you need 6 cores for? 4 cores is more than enough goy

2c/4t is enough

for camwhoring maybe

member that intel k processors need to have +20% tacked on due to the actual ability to overclock :^)

Just delid it bro

>being a threadlet

4 threads? What do you need 2 threads for?

>AdoredTV literally exposed all the Youtube shills who were getting paid by AMD to spread fake benchmarks
>the mentally ill AMD fanboy is still spamming those same benchmarks in every thread

>doesn't include 9700k and 9900k to prevent AMD from being obliterated

>sign of a literally retard that has no idea what he's talking about
I ran my 1600x fine for 2 years at 1.4v. Yes, I manually ran it at that. 1.4v only kills intel chips because they're housefires no matter what. It literally doesn't matter on amd chips.

>Having more resources than you currently need now and could use in the future is bad and worse than having barely enough resources.

Brainlet detected

Rational consumer who asks questions to make informed purchases here. What's the technical and logical reason for the 3600 performing much worse in new Dawn than in greek ass Creed?

Attached: 1549823256642.gif (244x255, 605K)

Setting the Voltage to above 1.3750 permanently will sooner or later end in degradation which means lower clock speed or even higher voltage. There's a difference between the CPU spiking to above 1.4V for fractions of a second and setting it at 1.4V manually.

>contard trash as a benchmark

shut up goy

>9400f is $150 retard
OH MY GAWD YOU TOTALLY FUCKING REKT HIM!

seething

cope

oh nonononono
the frametimes

stop shilling you fucking retards
t. r5 1600

the 9400f is running at 3.9; the 3600 is boosting itself to 4.1 / 4.2; this is stock cooler btw.
this is an intel-biased agme, acutally.

>doesnt include ryzen 9 3900x
>3700x beats 8700k and 7700k

>having to manually shut down every background process before you start your gaming session
yikes

I appreciate your posts; shit made me lol hard.

Attached: CP2077_Sun.png (330x319, 178K)

>this kills the israeli

Attached: shintel.png (1920x1080, 1.02M)

delid dis

Based and checked

Multithreading is antisemitic

>Multithreading
>in games

pick one pajeet

>can't beat 2yo cpu
what did amd mean by this

New dawn is single thread bound, hence why an i5 still performs at nearly the top of the stack. Its also why the 3700x is so much higher on the list since it hits 4.4ghz.

Asscreek is multicore bound and scales with threading instead of clocks/ipc

It's AMD unboxed. If they did the benchmark properly it would most likely lose to a 5 year old intel

Only poorly written games are single-threaded.

If by poorly written, you mean games that favor responsiveness then sure.

Learn to code, ranjeesh.

Venkata Murthy Renduchintala)))))))))))))))))))))))))

>needs multiple cores to handle all the clutter and useless trash in his shitty game
>learn to code

pajeet stop pooing in the video game market by releasing single threaded games, it's not 1995.

The 9400f is better value and stutter is overblown. The 2600 is also better value though, and has more threads.

>believing a piece of hardware fucking matters in overall performance when it's just the fucking issues with overblown, shitty fucking pseudo-games
When will you kids learn?

the 8700K has hyperthreading, the 9400F does not

What's your point, bitch?

first post worst post

Attached: phil-54.jpg (2048x1024, 669K)

this, for the new price of the 9400f I'd rather get a 2600.

it outperforms the 9400 because it has twice the threads?? (you) literally said the game was broken bc the 8700 was faster than the 9400

dumb
I dunno
have a point I guess
good point, I like AMD again
ha for sure

In all I'm confused again
I'fe I'm buying a $500 CPU should I want the best process and more cores over the seemingly shilling intelaviv is doing?

If you seriously have to ask if buying intel right now is a good idea then you'll never figure it out. Just give me your credit card and I'll make the right choice for you.

>.1% low of 17.1 fps

I will never understand how badly they mangled the Unreal 4 engine with PUBG.

I'm getting the 3900x
I want to see them cores!

If you buy AMD their fan might be free but it makes more noise than the engine of my car.

Something to consider.

are you retarded? blocking on one thread when you could be doing things in parallel reduces reaponsiveness

Hahahahahah shut up you piece of shit XD

>HUB are literally AMDrone central now
Prove it

/v/edditors all need to be lobotomized

The average fanboy from /v/ already has the intelligence of a lobotomy patient, videogames are for retards and nonwhites.