UserBench has officially cucked itself over

Stop using UserBench. They took Inturd's bribing paychecks fully up their ass.
For anyone who doesn't understand what happened - just a couple days ago pic-related was showing 3900X being in the Top 3 (above 9920X) and 9900K below Top 5. Now UserBench's SELLOUTS """""suddenly""""" decided to (((change))) the scoring system so that Inturd would be on top again. And these fucks don't even hide any at all, despite this particular time it being even more obvious and way worse than the CPU-Z case int he past.

Attached: USERBENCH SOLD OUT.png (282x207, 459K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9-9960X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-3600X/m653060vs4041
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

who gives a shit about some intel shill website. if you can't tell that the ryzen 5 3600 is by far the best value right now your IQ must be so low that literally everything turns into a challenge for you

Fuck you goyim

Attached: 1492139297054.jpg (752x548, 282K)

>who gives a shit about some intel shill website
There weren't considered a "shill site" up until just a couple days ago. Now they're completely in the shitter.

gaming is literally the only cpu intensive thing an average user does, rankings should reflect gaming performance and they do

Who cares I only ever used it to compare my overclocking scores to others.

3700X and 3900X was shown to be much better than Inturd in games (from 5 to 15%), but NOW it suddenly became "worse". Count 2+2, dimwit.

Well duh. Look at what they did and the lame excuse. What do you expect when they changed their algorithm a few weeks after Zen2 launched.

Up.

yeah, but AMD has spent so much money on viral marketing that we cannot have a website like this

Attached: cab4fb77098f4586e66acc70182ef9e30e35e4dc2f96cf719b42363aad9cd7d8.jpg (640x402, 105K)

that picture showed me that single core performance doesn't count

Because it's the first site that pops up when you do a quick google search for comparing CPU specs. You may not take this site seriously, I may not take this site seriously, but there are a fuckton of ignorant normalfags who don't know any better and just see a rank on userbenchmarks and decide based on that.

you should at least get rid of the watermark

Attached: cmonnow.jpg (640x402, 114K)

Like I care about some rando memey pic from the weebz.

When I decided to make a TR4 system I thought I knew what I was getting, however, as well as exceptional stability and performance I found that I was also elevated beyond these comparisons and arguments. It all seems so incredibly petty and small from here.

Save yourself, take the heavy metal pill.

Shut up bitch

Attached: 1564334325812.png (944x928, 110K)

The next door is voltages and idle temperatures.

>GayGPU
Oh look, it's THAT retarded buttmad Intbecile again.

where is 720p?

just keep randomly mashing insults on your keyboard in anger and frustration

there are no 3rd gen ryzens in that chart

>repeated use of "inturd"
Buttmad AMDrone detected, thread disregarded.

>3rd gen ryzen

what is this even supposed to be saying? There's no ryzen 3000 here.

Stay buttmad, kid:

Attached: 1562700232861.png (1405x1517, 78K)

Here's you "third gen" Ryzen

Keep in mind the chart that I posted earlier only shows the 9900K at stock speeds. At 5 GHz, it would easily reach 160 fps and annihilate your street shitting CPU

Attached: 1564230587913.png (1920x1080, 1.13M)

>cpu benchmark at 1440p/ultra
>surprise surprise 2600x, 3900x and 9900k perform the same

I've seen people shitting on UserBenchmark for years because of the way they measured performance
Now that they made the measurements more outrageous it's jsut more obvious

Attached: Intbecile 0880.png (400x400, 1.22M)

Are you delusional? The majority of benchmarks I've seen show intel winning

It's DX12 too. I've taken shits that were more relevant than that "benchmark"

Based UserBench

alright, now how about all other games besides far cry

Far Cry is a CPU bound game so it's the best way to benchmark a CPU.

lol that's not how that works

>no 0.1% lows
this is really the only significant difference anymore, if it's not different there then buy whatever is cheaper

>lol that's not how that works

Attached: 1564330784088.png (746x835, 26K)

Attached: 1562538404073.jpg (615x707, 197K)

Any game played at low resolutions will be CPU bound, which is why inteldrones raved on and on about CS:GO at 720p

noooooo guys BLUE TEAM BAD. VIDIYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: gamer.png (1080x608, 983K)

I can't tell if you're trolling or just retarded.

>single threaded game

Psst. Stick to the benchmarks your shill handler approves.

Attached: 1562509065028.png (1365x767, 571K)

So you don't care about high refresh rates?

Attached: 1562564161595.jpg (2560x1440, 237K)

>spending 500 for a CPU on a dying platform and $1200 for a 2080ti to play CS:GO at 720p

Eventually you'll play a game online and you'll keep getting btfo again and again and again.

So what will you do? You'll lower the graphics settings to get more FPS. But if you have an AMD, that won't help you. The guy who has an intel on the other hand will get 140+ fps and will btfo you again and again and again and there's nothing you will be able to do about it other than throwing away your Poozen PC and buying an intel.

Attached: 1560255798134.gif (380x184, 1.06M)

Who cares about that unless you're a streamer?

So you don't like high refresh rates?

>Eventually you'll play a game online
>So what will you do? You'll lower the graphics settings to get more FPS
>Gets shown Inturd is garbage for online gayming
>"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, WHO CARES!!!11"
Thanks for confirming AMD is the smarter choice.

>AMD matches intel at capping 144HZ montiros
>Intel benchmarks only greatly exceed in 1080p setups and above 144fps in majority of cases
watch out for reviewers using percentages for everything. wow you get 5 to 10 frames more when both averages cap refresh rate impressive!
oof well too bad doing literally anything else than gaming is going to be close to 50% slower on intel but lets just not talk about that you don't do anything else on your computer right?

Why do you get so caught up in all these brand wars? Step back for a second and read your post. Replace all the "inturd's" with "amdturd's" and look how pathetic it is. You think either of these companies care about you? Buy whatever product's better at the time and go on with your life

>Intel benchmarks only greatly exceed in 720p
Fixed your mistake.

>>Gets shown Inturd is garbage for online gayming
Online streaming, not gaming

>Replace all the "inturd's" with "amdturds"
You can't replace a turd with something that isn't. Calling Inturd an Inturd, is merely stating the obvious factual truth of the harsh reality.

Attached: 1013423_164144617097928_2086563000_n.jpg (960x945, 55K)

Ok, can't rooting for tech companies that don't give a fuck about you

mass replies should be an auto ban

No matter how much you try to cope, you will always be stuck with your Poozen PC and you'll be forced to remember it every time you hit your CPU bottleneck

Attached: 1562509406387.png (671x837, 36K)

>15% more FPS doesn't matter!

Here's a fun fact:

I never hit a CPU bottleneck with my intel.

But you do.

freesync/gsync exist, you're not going to notice when above 100~ fps with either cpu, now if your 0.1% fps drops below your freesync/gsync range you will notice since it will tear from the stuttering

You sound like those consolefags 10 years ago who used to say that there's no difference above 30 fps.

>high refresh rate gaming doesn't matter!

>REEEEEEEEEE. b-b-b-BUT MUH 25 MORE FEEPEES IN BENCHIES!!!11
>for 40% more stuttering and 25% higher temps, 80% higher price, 100% less threads and 50% less cores
>BUT LOOK MOMMY, MORE FEEPEES ON COUNTERS!

How the fuck does that surprise you? Anyone looking to build a 1440p/144hz rig got the same stupid fucking reply from Jow Forumstards here. 5700xt/3600 because it's "good enough" because you can "just turn settings" completely ignoring the fact that a system that is barely fine today will be a waste of money in 1-2 years. Faggots would rather bite their fucking tongue than recommend a a build that is more suited to the task.

The thing is, if you had an FX or something like that, everything you just said would be true and I wouldn't even try to argue because there would be no point. If you're not a competitive gamer and just want to play the game and don't care about super high refresh rates, you can build a PC for $200 and it would be fine, who cares.

But you have a Ryzen. The difference in price with Intel is absolutely insignificant.

You got punked, plain and simple, and you should be mocked and humiliated for your stupidity.

fps : average theoretical frame latency ignoring monitor response times
>30 FPS : 33ms
>60 FPS : 16.66ms
>100 FPS : 10ms
>120 FPS : 8.33ms
>144 FPS : 6.944ms

the gains from 100 to 120, 120 to 144 are minimal, at that point getting a better monitor with lower response times has better gains for input lag. the 720p 500 fps csgo meme is completely nonsensical

>h-high refresh rate gaming doesn't matter!!1

Input lag is entirely independent of framerates. There are games that run at 100 fps that have 33 ms input lag and there are games that run at 200 fps that have 150 ms input lag. This is exactly why all these DX12 benchmarks are worthless, games that run on DX12 have such high latency that you won't care that you're getting 200 gorillion fps, you'll switch back to DX11 after 5 minutes

No it doesn't but I need 240 fps so I can shitpost 4x faster than you.

Attached: file.png (2159x1079, 724K)

Why does amd = pajeet = shits in street? Cpubenchmark clearly shows that intel is better now with the new gen chips.

What is the 9400f, you dumbass?

[x] Streaming don't matter

>CS:GO
The absolute state of AMDrones.

They were always a shill site. Their "CPU tests" don't even make use of SIMD, something that's been available for decades and is used in even the shittiest pajeet code nowadays.

>the game which is lauded as "Intel-favorite" because it always was [performing better with Intel for several years
>"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, AMDROOOONSEEEEEEEEEE!!!11 CS DOESN'T MAYTTERRRR!!!111"

Imagine samefagging this hard just so you can post your seething all caps greentext bullshit.

jesus christ the amount of stress you people put yourselves through over processor benchmarks
so glad I don't give two fucks about hardware like you freaks


sent from my Apple iMacintosh

Fuck all of you, till I get 60 FPS in 1080P, I'm fine.

Attached: 1564324284428.gif (201x259, 729K)

Attached: DED.png (370x339, 983K)

More like userbenchmark is BTFOing itself

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9-9960X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-3600X/m653060vs4041

Attached: 1528269341610.jpg (466x591, 23K)

Retarded indian intel monkeys are at it again.

Always wondered - is it a woman or a dude? I've heard some rumors that it might be a tranny, but that would make Logan maximum ghey, and I never thought he'd be one of "them", by the way how he looks and acts.

Why should he if someone from Jow ForumsAyymd made it?

Haha! Poorfags btfo

>5-5.1ghz i7 9700kf is still the best cpu in 99% of games
Call me when that changes.

>Now compiled with ICC for maximum performance, goy!

A worse product

>literal reddit cope

lmao

>single-core performance

Attached: 1500727287280.jpg (944x670, 47K)

a piece of garbage

>AMDrones throw a tantrum over something that doesn't concur with their safe space bubble anymore
like pottery

Nice coping, Intbecile.

Seriously, why are intards so pathetic? They're so bad at shilling they're basically shitting on their own company