What's the best alternative to Github?

>white
they can't help themselves.

To give them a sense of power over their lives, which is fake.

Github alternative hosted on github lol

>them
Who? The goyim?

Wrong. Actions are dependent on words. Not the other way around. Words alone can change the state of reality. Say a few magic words in an interview, suddenly your thrust into a career. Say a few magic words in a debate, suddenly you are president. Say a few magic words at a pitch meeting and you'll have millions of dollars today that you didn't yesterday. Words create symbols and symbols are more important than reality or 'actions' to human beings.

Even if the state decided that action was no longer illegal, the words themselves would still have power.

>Program_v1.txt
>Program_v2.txt
>Program_bug_fix_v3.txt
>Program_bug_DEFINATELY_fixed_v4.txt

Any system that competes with others (market or otherwise) that does not operate as a meritocracy is doomed to fail as it will eventually be outrun by a competing system that does.

gitgud.io

>Meritocracy
>1: a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement
>2: leadership selected on the basis of intellectual criteria
I have no idea how the fuck this was a problem. Was there a mass shooting in the name of meritocracy or something? Are they confusing it with eugenics? Am I just a brainlet who's missing something obvious?

gitlab

>fpbp

Simply put, diversity hire incoming. The retards gonna kill it.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/13/its-time-to-abandon-the-cruelty-of-meritocracy
Pay attention to the author's name

Because nazis

What's the best alternative to Github specifically for it's hub features ? (code review, project management, documentation, social networking, etc)

why do journalists always write in a way where it's painful to read
this applies to all of them too, not just the new-age website exclusive outlets that are being pooped out all over Jow Forums by faggots like OP

Need to fill the quota for women and minorities even if they are unqualified.

It's a sign that GitHub is going straight downhill from now on.

here is an example the linux foundation:

"
The Linux Foundation is committed to diversity and inclusion and we urge all members of the open source community to conduct themselves with appropriate professionalism and respect in accordance with our Code of Conduct.

We strive to build inclusive communities through investment in programs, career development, and events that provide opportunities to underrepresented and disadvantaged groups around the world.

We believe the power of collaboration is greater when many different perspectives are included and that’s why we provide financial and non-financial resources, such as booths at events, training scholarships, travel assistance and more. The Linux Foundation has engaged for many years in initiatives to improve diversity and inclusion in our communities, including #YesWeCode, All Star Code, Blacks In Technology, ChickTech, CodeChix, Girls in Tech, Kids on Computers, Outreachy, Powering Potential, Women in Big Data, and Women Who Code."

meritocracy leads to male whites and asians being on top and some companies cant stomach that.

At this point we can say that anything based in the West is or will be compromised.

Because any moron can be a “journalist” now. I cringe every time I see it.

Let the liberals foot you hosting bill.

Based in San Fransicko used by many of the large tech corporations...it is doomed also, only a matter of time.

It's a problem because it's a patently and demonstrably wrong concept that won't fucking die, like the good savage or the free market.

We're gonna need one. I think corporations in the west are frightened that competing malware is in all software on it.
Can't have competition amirite?

>Pearlstein
>-stein

Attached: 1563802112313.jpg (1196x676, 673K)

Mercurial, if you're a patrician. If not, Gitgud I guess, it's one of the few not ultimately owned by a massive data-harvesting monolithic corporation.

Now you are starting to see why the 2nd amendment is more important than the 1st

2nd amendment is to defend the first.

the question is about github, not git. you don't even need a central repo for git you can work through email alone.

>Pulitzer-prize winning economics columnist at the Washington Post and Robinson Professor of Public Affairs at George Mason University.
>WaPo

Look at this laugh:
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/08/how-to-fix-capitalism-eight-experts-solutions
>How to fix capitalism: nine expert solutions for America's broken system
>All workers need to share in their company’s success
especially the ones that do nothing amirite?

Yet then a different author in the same article:
>Reject the myth that rising inequality is inevitable

Attached: kek.jpg (480x640, 12K)

I'm in a bit of a philosophical mood right now.
If you'll humor me for a minute what was the last time you did something meaningful?

Self-hosted Gitea. Else, if you want to contribute to some existing project, then you go where the project is.

Gitlab is the technically superior alternative if you want to setup a CI/CD pipeline for free/cheap, but don't pretend it isn't lead by people who're just as politically retarded as the ones at Github.
gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/42751

Both are to "protect" each other.
And by protect, I mean fuck anybody that makes a cocoon of speech and power.

Words are used to make actions yes. But human will is the function that makes the action proceed. Words are just one source of fuel. A petty source of fuel.

Only faggots and bitches hate words alone.

>he says this while posting on Jow Forums and Jow Forums

Attached: 1562929554116.jpg (346x313, 26K)

I hate this timeline. Jow Forums was right we need to gas these fuckers

Attached: 1562281541562.png (958x329, 14K)

These faggots are literally removing the ability to criticise in software development. Just let that sink in and think about how people solve problems. Problem solving involves criticism naturally. They're essentially beginning the process of removing criticism.
The world is FUCKED if this shit doesn't stop. You can complain about feels as much as you like, but the moment you take action is the moment you are taping mouths and potential insight.
It's like they hate being reminded of reality.

Attached: 1563210196028.jpg (335x369, 35K)

>gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/42751
jesus fucking christ

Attached: 1560743092857.jpg (600x600, 106K)

Who the fuck thought it was a good idea to enable the use of emojis on a code hosting platform in the first place?

To be clear, I agree with the first guy's sentiment but a lot of what I see in myself and those around me is empty signaling. From what I've seen: actually being a compassionate/intelligent/good/situationaly valuable person and appearing to be those adjectives on the surface are two separate skillsets. There are so few direct, natural pressures on people in developed countries that the focus shifts from controlling reality to controlling the perceptions of those around you. Its possible and often preferable for people to focus on the latter rather than the former... I ... wait... You're just going to post more smug anime faces at me, aren't you...

Source hut?

>if I post a letter
That's an action, retard.

Get a VPS, (i have Linode), load up Gogs. There you go. Just put some SSL/TLS on that fucker and you're good to go.

Attached: dvdue3hfh7331.jpg (1302x1145, 428K)

is bitbucket good?

Github is a fucking disgrace, first surrendering to SJWs, now blocking access to countries under US sanctions. Whatever happened to advocating free software? Fucking hypocrites.

>“Master”, which is problematic language, both because of it being gendered

what are these retards even talking about, S&M shit?

Master, please fill up me up with your hot code.

>2014
Strange to bring up a five year old article screenshot, but okay.

Incorrect.

Businesses that manage to deliver services to the government more cheaply receive more money and will dominate solely because the government can print all of the money that it wants.

Nah, you have to take the JSF approach on government projects to get the most amount of money.

that's what happens when you follow a communist ideology created by a kike. First it's about muh freedumbs then suddenly you're in a fascist dictatorship. It's a virus of the mind where the road to hell is paved with good intentions

Seconding Gogs. Don't be a fag, just self-host it.

The problem is that the market is so entrenched, and Github has so much money and so many resources, that creating a better alternative that can compete is difficult.

Based, anyone that uses emojis should be banned.

Are we blaming '''communists''' for an American company withholding service to embargoed countries? This is peak Jow Forumstard.

Isn't Github owned by Microsoft now? Why would they care about identity politics? Google, Twitter, and Facebook are all California based so it makes sense they go full far left, but I thought MS was for the grown-ups who actually need to to accomplish shit like running government, military, and industry. Or is this a new take on their EEE strategy: kill opensource using politics.

Host your own gitlab

>>Reject the myth that rising inequality is inevitable
>myth
Just asserting it is a myth doesn't mean it's a myth. Human societies will have various forms of inequality REGARDLESS of how they are organized. Anyone who denies this clearly lives in the world of imaginary utopias and needs to shut the fuck up.

>monkey emoticon
Why would he have a problem with the monkey emoticon? Is he perhaps monkyephobic? Aren't all primates equal and equally beautiful? Isn't this just human supremacy?

Also there's something called Gitea, not sure if it's better or worse than Gogs, maybe someone can say what their experience was.

Attached: 1440445784050.jpg (320x308, 92K)

Oh, they have a comparison table that includes Gogs:

docs.gitea.io/en-us/comparison/

Anyone care to give some feedback on how good Gitea is?

>FIDO U2F (2FA)
>OAuth 2.0 integration (external authorization)
>Two factor authentication (2FA)
>Repository code search
>Global code search
>Commit graph
>GPG Signed Commits

Well shit dawg, Gitea looks much better than Gogs.

They have a ready docker image too:
hub.docker.com/r/gitea/gitea/

Attached: perfect.jpg (333x333, 45K)

>Human societies will have various forms of inequality REGARDLESS of how they are organized. Anyone who denies this clearly lives in the world of imaginary utopias and needs to shut the fuck up.

Anybody trying to refute the inevitability of inequality is literally anti-science, because inequality is a primary component of the theory of Evolution.

>gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/42751
That entire thread just gave me cancer. I hate neolibs so fucking much. I bet pic related guy got unpersoned for this post

Attached: voice of reason.png (719x574, 64K)

These people are mentally ill and should not be given attention. 100 years ago they would have been put in an institution, now they are shitting up projects they have no right touching.

unapologetic retard

Looks like he still has his account.

"Science" is more of a religion these days. A than actual science. A bunch of so-called scientists working for the government finding results that the politicians funding the studies want them to find. That's really all it is. Any person or idea that goes against the narrative is crushed, without any empirical evidence. Look what happened to James Watson.

>Wrong. Actions are dependent on words. Not the other way around.
ironic shitposting is still shitposting

someone should post the screenshot of that one danger hair retard on github whose contribution to every repo she ever touched were just CoC’s

I want to be called Master instead of Mantainer.

i legit wish a black dev with his profile pic fully visible straight up commented “no, it’s my turn to be the master now” in that thread.
but alas, it’s too late.

Because it's never based on merit. Humans are cliquish creatures.
"Meritocracy" is never used objectively, it is used by those in power to describe the system biased in their favor so they do not have to take a second look at it to see it is not a meritocracy at all. It is simply a way to whitewash the result of bias as not having been the result of bias at all, and then it is not used to describe systems which are biased against them.

It's:

"Heads I win, tails you lose. As this is a meritocracy there is nothing wrong with this -- you simply don't have the merit to win. Oh, and if it was heads you win tails I lose, THAT IS TOTALLY UNFAIR AND OBVIOUSLY NOT A MERITOCRACY AT ALL SO WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS INSTITUTE THE MERITOCRACY OF HEADS I WIN TAILS YOU LOSE TO GET THINGS BACK TO EVEN AGAIN!"

To be fair Watson presented a hypothesis as fact which wasn't very scientific either.

Whatever they fucking did it worked, since they won the tech-company lottery by getting bought out by Microsoft for a cool 7.5 billion.

>words have no value
>how do politicians get elected
>how people influence other people
>how people blindly follow other people
You might have brain tumor, because you make no sense.

gitgud.io/

You can apply this logic to any possible value, but that doesn't make the value bad.

>Because it's never based on justice. Humans are cliquish creatures.
>"Social Justice" is never used objectively, it is used by those in power to describe the system biased in their favor so they do not have to take a second look at it to see it is not social justice at all. It is simply a way to whitewash the result of bias as not having been the result of bias at all, and then it is not used to describe systems which are biased against them

That's true though, "social justice" and "meritocracy" are basically vaporware buzzphrazes.

I mean, who gives a shit about politics? They're not owned by Microsoft, whereas Github is. Who knows what else they pulled since the takeover. Telemetry wouldn't surprise me.

they had a lecture for data science doing work for government and they did not use github they used usb and made copy

Yes and no. Words have no more or less power than we choose to give them.

if the meritocracy system is real and not a meme, just rename it, keep using it, and don't allow the tech activists to discourage you.

why post that specific post and not a string of random characters?
why say anything at all?

>calling blacks less intelligent isnt a fact

daily reminder that the word 'meritocracy' was coined by someone who thought it was going to be a bad thing and who basically described the people who are running the modern world into the ground as the new elite class of arrogant 'meritocrats' with no connection to ordinary people.

You might as well say that everything is wrong because humans are flawed creatures. Stop using language, because people can lie. Stop making cars, because people can kill each other with them. Stop eating, because people can get morbidly obese.
It's pointless to use "humans aren't perfect" in defense of anything.

get a load of this nigga
though I agree with some of that

Attached: gab.jpg (457x652, 36K)

>Human societies will have various forms of inequality REGARDLESS of how they are organized. Anyone who denies this clearly lives in the world of imaginary utopias and needs to shut the fuck up.
They didn't say that inequality wasn't inevitable though, they said that inequality didn't have to rise. Which is true. It has both increased and decreased at various points in history.

Strange that this is the only post that mentions it