Intel 660p or Samsung evo?
Intel 660p or Samsung evo?
Owen Cooper
Other urls found in this thread:
newegg.com
twitter.com
Luke Nelson
>QLC
Landon Martinez
nvme is a fucking meme
Dominic Jenkins
for what uses?
Jason Adams
>anime
Zachary Young
samsung is the safest bet
crucial is ok for 2.5" sata ssds, idk if they make nvme
Matthew Ross
They do make NVME, a lot cheaper than others
CT1000P1SSD8
Jaxon Diaz
General purpose main drive, maybe a bit of gaming, blender and vmware.
My budget is 100-150€, so I would choose between a crucial nvme for 115, a samsung (non-nvme) ssd for 130 or a Intel 660p for 99€
Caleb Sanders
You're comparing the cheapest bottom of the spectrum to the expensive end. You're asking "fast and expensive" or "slower and cheap".
The half answer is 660p because you won't notice the performance difference of the Samsung versus the cost.
The full answer is neither because there are cheap TLC drives priced near the 660p that don't have significant write or capacity performance decay. Siliconpower has one that'll do 3400/3200 in 1tb for $100 often. Below that but easier to find is xpg sx8200
Michael James
I'm comparing an expensive ssd (130€) with cheap nvme. Also, sililconpower is around €140, while xpg is at an outrageous €199.90, even more than the samsung evo nvme variant. The cheap build in by lenovo chink nvme of my thinkpad broke, so I need a new one
Choices are pretty much:
Sata:
Crucial MX500 CT1000MX500SSD1(Z) (112€)
MZ-76E1T0B (135€)
MZ-76Q1T0BW (115€)
M2:
WDS100T2B0B (124€)
Crucial MX500 CT1000MX500SSD4 (110€)
CT1000P1SSD8 (115€)
Nvme:
Silicon Power (140€)
Crucial P1 CT1000P1SSD8 (115€)
Samsung MZ-V7E1T0BW (198€)
Intel (98€)
Sabret Rocket 2280 (132€)
Luis Howard
Intel is not really worth it, it degrades too fast.
Joshua Gutierrez
Get samsung pro and have it you know not break.
Gabriel Gray
Normal people won't go through the 200TBW lifespan of the 1TB model.
But if you're using the SSD as a working storage, like video editing, photo storage for your work, cache, etc. then it's worth going with Silicon Power, Sabrent Rocket, or the Samsung.
Julian Edwards
dont get QLC, thats only good for storage
MLC will better suit you, its costlier but has better reliability and lifespan
Cameron Harris
Do you mean the sata or the nvme one?
Henry Nelson
>bought Samsung PM981 3000/1800Mbps 512GB m2 for 60€
I truly am the god of finding good deals, i also bought a new ryzen 1700x for ~110€ and a 1440p 144Hz 27" VA panel for 250€. This all while living in very expensive europoor country.
Brody Gonzalez
It's only $85 right now
Nathaniel Jackson
Nvme.
Nathan Hughes
intel optane is the best one.
Eli Mitchell
Anime means animation. That is a still image. It is not anime.
Ian Evans
The siliconpower one is BETTER than the XPG, if it's 140 you should buy it because it's very close to the evo.
ANY nvme SSD is better than ANY sata ssd. Even the shitter NVME ssds are 2-3x as fast as the better sata SSD, it's protocol differences that make it better more than raw hardware, nvme technology lets the system access more shit at once. If you can use NVME you should not be buying SATA based drives at all.
Grayson Ward
poorfag
Jackson Cooper
That's an average deal for a pm981. Also the pm981a isn't much more.
Kayden Thomas
Retarded. It's the complete opposite, QLC is shit for storage.
Sebastian Taylor
>hey flash storage is super fast and is bottlenecked by SATA, why don't we use PCIE instead?
>IT'S A MEME REEEEEE
Nathaniel Perry
in my country it costs 90€ on average
Levi Sullivan
>That is a still image.
Wrong, it refreshes 60 times a seconds on your 1366x768 100nits TN panel
Hunter Clark
660p if you want cheap , evo if you want warranty.
Joseph Carter
I keep hearing about TLC and QLC being shit, so what are some drives that aren't? Disregarding price (within reason). Pretty sure I've seen someone go
>QLC/TLC
about even higher end NVME drives.
Wyatt Cooper
>Intel 660p
Imagine buying QLC shit.
Landon Cruz
What about a crucial p1?
Adam Anderson
Is the ADATA xpg-sx8200-pro-512gb as good as they say?
Bentley Nelson
>NVMeme
>QLC
>Intel aviv