Why aren't you running Pop! OS, Jow Forums?

Seriously it's the best.

>Ubuntu based, so best support. Millions of posts for almost every problem you might have, and solutions too. Just Werks.
>Updated graphics drivers
>(optional) nVidia driver in the install ISO
>nice default theme (personally I change it)
>When Ubuntu was waffling on including 32-bit libraries (for steam and wine etc), Pop! said they would maintain them if Ubuntu dropped support.

Why aren't you running it right now?

Attached: tux pop.png (3072x3072, 207K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

For me, its elementary OS

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-07-30 22.15.04.png (1600x900, 1.63M)

Because it's ubuntu but with an icon pack. Sage, yea i don't care jannies.

that's fair. I used to run elementary OS until I realized that I like GNOME shell better.

Please don't break the rules in the Friendly Pop! OS Thread

Based. If it wasn't so buggy I would recommend it to everyone.

Because it can't give me 150% scaling

so am I dumb for just using Arch

Attached: Screenshot_20190731_003548.jpg (6400x1440, 1.12M)

@72118692
you're dumb for being a tripfag

why would you want that? what's your resolution?

2560 x 1440

it was my last distro.
it froze often and wouldnt let install a lamp server cause it was ubuntu 18.10 and sql had compability issues.
so now i have the good ol dependable ubuntu without the bells and whistles and it runs way better.

on what size of screen? 27" here and it looks perfect at 100%

I have 27" 1440p and it looks bad to me, 27 inch should be 4k

Laptop, 14 inch, t480.
The 1080 panel had pretty bad colour accuracy so I got the higher res one

Fedora has better repositories and package manager. Software is close to upstream, no unnecessary patches applied. If you want something a tiny bit more stable you can use the previous version, it's still supported.

Yes

I'm using Debian and don't need new software so I pretty much have no reason to switch to another Debian grandson.

>sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade
>reboot
>only one monitor detected
>feels like no grahpics driver
i tried everything, i fixed it by booting with the old kernal.
never had this much problems with any distro.

What graphics card?

You could try reinstalling the driver, it's possible it got uninstalled but it shouldn't happen.

GTX 1080
i did that, i even installed old version of the driver. it didn't fix it.

should be as simple as installing nvidia-driver-430, which is the latest and should still support the card since it's recent.

well i did that, it didn't help

it's basically ubuntu but somehow better.

>Another franken Debian
Very creative. Why not just use Debian/Devuan, oh that's right
>muh wi-fi
>my nvidia
People hate reading a couple lines to get all this working, nevermind then.

well if the driver is installed and loaded it's only a matter of opening nvidia-settings to verify the preceding and modify your outputs. If you have trouble with nVidia and Pop! then you'll have trouble with any Ubuntu derivative, Pop! is just easier. It's also possible you've created an xorg.conf file that is not needed and is creating a misconfiguration.

Debian testing/sid snapshotted and made stable. Newer packages than buster, which just released and will only get more stale from here. I personally had an issue on Debian with ncurses not being compiled with scroll wheel down support, had to middle click to scroll down in cmus which was a pain. It Just Werks on Pop! and Ubuntu 19.04.

If it's the best, then why is it not endorsed by the FSF?
gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html

Attached: 2019-07-31-113647_922x710_scrot.png (922x710, 94K)

Because it literally allows you to install non-free software if you choose to.

So it doesn't satisfy the autism of the FSF, which only endorses distros if they infringe on your freedom to install whatever the hell you want.

I really don't want to derail the thread with this old trope though.