Thanks, Jow Forums. Now I'm OBSESSED with getting all the old music I had in FLAC and running Spek on everything (which has led me to lots of dissapointment). Every "320 kbps MP3" that looks like this puts the pain a little deeper into my soul. I'm even getting good at spotting them now without using Spek.
I fear you'll see me next on audiophyle threads.
Thanks, Jow Forums...
Liam Robinson
Jeremiah Gonzalez
>2 canales
good luck with affording audiophile stuff.
Charles Bennett
You need better reading skills user.
Jack Nguyen
Josiah Morales
Oh I see, is the language. Not my fault I'm fluent in both.
Zachary Young
AAC is pretty.
Logan Ross
Based. I'm going either AAC or OPUS from now on for my transcodes.
Juan Price
>44khz
never gonna make it
Wyatt Mitchell
44.1 KHz is the sample rate, you buffoon. Absolute best case scenario maximum high frequency is 0.5 x Sample Rate.
But of course, if you're just a troll, you knew that.
Nolan Robinson
I buy CDs and what is this
Jack Ward
mp3 is deprecated trash. It's like watching a xvid shit these days.
FLAC for archives, Opus for on the go.
Zachary Baker
that's why you'll never make it
Owen Russell
aac can sound better than flac sometimes
Ryan Brooks
Incorrect.
Robert Butler
Why do my FLAC music sounds punchier than MP3s?
Jeremiah Robinson
> what.cd flashbacks from that retarded interview that i got by by cheating every single time
Easton Martinez
FLAC is lossless. During playback it should sound exactly the same as whatever the source material was. mp3 and aac are lossy, so regardless of whether you can hear it or not, there is loss of quality.
Nolan Harris
If you can only hear frequencies between 5 khz and 20 khz how can there be a loss of quality you moron?
Matthew Carter
Next time, ask a question worth answering.
Jose Clark
Ok daddy, what quality are you exactly losing if the lost frequencies are above what you can physiologically hear with your ear?
Adrian Thompson
>OPUS
Opus has a 20kHz cut-off though.
Leo Jenkins
Depends on the bitrate. Compare a 64kbps mp3 to a 320kbps mp3 and you'll hear a big difference.
FLAC is for archiving because it'll always be the same quality as the source material whereas mp3 isn't.
Nathaniel Campbell
>mp3
>expecting it to not be terrible
Zachary Russell
>implying you can hear more than 20khz
ok batman
Charles Rodriguez
you don't gain much in compression just by lopping off everything below 5k and above 20k
mp3 and aac do other compression in addition to that
Asher Ramirez
>weebshit
It was trash regardless.
Jason Martin
That's not weeb.
Asher Williams
You can automate this entire process completely.
Luke Young
b-but you get the feeling you are in live music concert if there is frequencies above the hearing range
Aaron Ross
Most parts of the music will be completely unaffected by the lack of those missing upper frequencies. 99% of instruments and vocals will sound no different. You might be able to notice a slight difference with cymbals if you have really good hearing.
Joshua Morgan
Where do you get your aac anime music?
Nathan Ross
>Spek
Is there GNU/Linux or do I need to run it in wine?
Elijah Ramirez
Jeez you can even compile in bsd if you want.
Lucas Murphy
yes it's called Snek
Matthew Robinson
more sox-me.desktop
[Desktop Entry]
Type=Application
Name=SPECTROGRAM
Exec=/usr/bin/sh .local/bin/sox.sh
#Exec=sox %F -n spectrogram
Terminal=false
StartupNotify=false
NoDisplay=true
more sox.sh
#!/usr/bin/dash
/bin/sox "$@" -n spectrogram -o "$@".png
Carter Lopez
enjoy your autism
Oliver Bennett
no, you better run windows on a vm and then download Spek, it's better this way, trust me.
Dominic Ward
t. me in 2017
you will get through it user, don't worry
Kayden James
>spek
use ocenaudio. It has a better spectrogram
Zachary Howard
if the mp3 is not a shitty transcode and it's 320kbps or v0, then it's placebo. Do an ABX test.
Lincoln Myers
>windows
use linux - it has a better os