OH NO NO NO NO NONONONONO INTELBROS THIS CANT BE HAPPENING AGAIN!
OH NO NO NO NO NONONONONO INTELBROS THIS CANT BE HAPPENING AGAIN!
Other urls found in this thread:
guru3d.com
forbes.com
businesscomputingworld.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
cia.gov
google.com
phoronix.com
twitter.com
It's not a flaw if it's by design
MY FRIENDS. IT JUST. KEEPS. HAPPENING
Thank god it's only post Ivy Bridge, my fucking sandy cpu is slower than a goddamn Bulldozer by now
to be honest, this isn't surprising. intel has always been a library of security flaws and exploits have been found MANY times
>its not a bug, its a feature
intel = pajeet confirmed
I already had to disable the mitigations on my laptop because it was running too slow
I summon thee, Satania
No, it just confirms Intel has to obey US laws.
Have you removed the locks from your house and car as well to speed things up?
Doubt 100%, all of these flaws exist within speculative execution, i5s and SMT disabled i7s are immune. And with the fact that this vulnerability only works post ivy bridge means its really just intel implementing SMT in a not secure way.
Speculative execution is NOT hyperthreading/SMT only.
This
All these backdoors are for US intelligence agencies
Any other tech company having this many """security flaws""" would have been bankrupt within months but Intel is still standing strong
Intel will never address these security flaws and will just duct tape them for future products
Intel can't go bankrupt because they're the foundation of the modern technological infrastructure, same with MS and Windows. In both cases it doesn't matter how bad things ever get from them because there's no actual legitimate alternatives on a wide scale.
They cannot go bankrupt because US intelligence needs that company to sell backdoored hardware.
it's only as though you removed your butt plug
it's not like everyone is out to stick their nob up your shit hole
just because you arent using a butt plug
>i5s and SMT disabled i7s are immune.
Ignorance is bliss
You know the tubbers got your're rubber you know hes going to tub you, hes tubbing right behind you, hes tubbing at your're door...
Attacks are automated and effortless. It's not like probing a car/front door which costs an enormous amount of effort compared to compromising idiot's PCs
>Intel
Why would anyone ever own one those ?
I understood that reference
if the CIA were networking into your shit all the time would sysadmins not see them with packetsniffers and such?
Sandy Bridge G.O.A.T. confirmed
>if the CIA were networking into your shit all the time would sysadmins not see them with packetsniffers and such?
On your router, sure.
Intel ME hides itself completely from the OS, so there's no way you'd be able to pick up the traffic from your computer, but it still has to go through the gateway.
This is largely why I don't care about the FUD on Jow Forums. Once there is actual evidence, it will be clear. We will actually have captured packets and a full breakdown of ME access. While such is lacking it's just speculation and fear and can be safely discarded.
>Thank god it's only post Ivy Bridge
tfw Haswell
SWAPGSAttack: New vulnerability hits Intel processors starting at Ivy Bridge
Microsoft Confirms New Windows CPU Attack Vulnerability, Advises All Users To Update Now
nice reference
im never buying intjeet again
Glad I bought Ryzen recently.
Good timing, just finished my 3700X build, all I have to do is clean my video card and move it over.
Becauce normalfags aren't interested and Intel is still "the best you can get" according to most of them.
mfw still on sandy bridge
mfw it's proof that sandy bridge is superior
post yfw when AMD is NOT AFFECTED but Intel's unreleased 400 Watt 56 core CPU is
>Implying the routers aren't compromised too
Which ones?
These "flaws" are there by design, where do you think Intel is taking all the extra performance from? By cutting corners and hoping it never comes to light.
Spectre and Meltdown were known internally possible for ages before publicity, even people on Jow Forums talked about them years before anyone gave a fuck.
Their lies are catching up to them and that's good, hope they won't try to fuck with their customers like that anymore.
As if Intel would ever stop fucking everyone over, good luck with that one
>NOOOOOO THERE'S A 1/1000000000000000 CHANCE I'LL GET HACKED!
>I CAN'T LET THE FBI SEE MY PEDOSHIT!
>FUCK YOU INTEL!!!!!
INTELLIOTS BTFO
BTFO
NSA and CIA keep intercepting Cisco routers and install hardware into them.
*fuckin saves and adds to rare pepe compilation*
Just wait for 10nm+++
Will only have vulnerabilities+++
That's literally not even the argument here, people don't care about the exploit itself and the hypothetical risks involved, people only care about the patches that will reduce performance and continue to make Intel a less and less convincing choice to spend your money on.
>Intel ME hides itself completely from the OS, so there's no way you'd be able to pick up the traffic from your computer, but it still has to go through the gateway.
Dis why they wanted to put wifi on motherboard.
I wuz like, fuck i want wifi on my desktop. i run cat6 cable, way faster, very low latency.
based
here's another one for your collection fren
>headline thread
is that way
Apparently this was already fixed in the july windows update, so no performance loss.
>Spectre and Meltdown were known internally possible for ages before publicity, even people on Jow Forums talked about them years before anyone gave a fuck.
source?
>"The servers, powered by AMD’s EPYC processors, beat one previous virtualisation performance record by 321 percent."
Based Wendell.
why should I care
I still have hyperthreading
I'm not a datacenter
I'm a consumer
I don't have anything hackers want lol
>intel
>NSA
>CIA
>Mossad
>all have their fingers in intel
hmm I wonder why intel has so many obscure flaws that result in attackers being able to read out private keys :thonking:
Now intel security researchers are feverishly looking for security flaws in their competitor's product. ARM and AMD have managed to outsource fabrication and now they don't even have to look for flaws anymore.
IT'S ANOTHER SHOAH!
Oy gevalt, if you force us to close all the NSA backdoors, we'll just make new ones!
>barry soetoro
>US presidnet
wut
>Not updating/switching up your backdoors regularly
What a shite company
based
>he thinks amd doesn't have any crippling flaws
what specie is this shit
Your hugely underestimating the required context and metadata needed to exploit such a vuln. There have been none caught in the wild. Stop the FUD
Cope
Seethe
DO NOT bully pure sweet Krista.
>what specie
pure gold
Tfw my haslel is getting slower by the day
>unironically downplays a vulnerability of the most popular group of PC processors.
Literally wut?
...
>pure sweet
ok chaim
>pure gold
-stein
Give up your old and busted InTelAviv processor and get a shiny new one from AMD and Mama Su!
theres nothing to be afraid of for fucks sakes. Its all a bunch of arxiv publications and FUD
>vulnerabilities are FUD
we've reached full circle
Vulnerabilities don’t matter
kek
OY VEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
show me one single website or app that currently employs such a exploit
...
>show me one single website or app that currently employs such a exploit
cia.gov
Fucking falseflaggers.
>N-NO, ITS THE CHINESE BACKDOORS THAT ARE WRONG GOYIM, DON'T TRUST THEM EVEN THOUGH THEY HELP US MAKING OUR OWN BACK DOORS
>No link provided
>intel shills didn't even ask for a proofs
>they just accept bad news at this point.
Barack Obama’s step father was an Indonesian named Leo Soetoro, yet somehow, even after abandoning him, Barack worships his nigger father.
imagine being this retarded
there's a literal 3g modem in there bros. they don't need wifi or eth.
Tell me right now how that's retarded.
It being patched means you take performance loss, just like meltdown and spectre
And did anyone notice a performance loss on the july update...?
phoronix.com
Around 1%
I dont but thats because I dont update windows
don't see it anywhere
that's just a shitty worthless demo
At this point nobody cares anymore. Might as well not fix it.