Is there a more up to date version of this guide?

This guide doesn't mention BiglyBT which is a, relatively, new ad-free fork of Vuze by its original developers but it's still kinda bloated and in every torrent you add the client asks you for a donation, which, normally, I wouldn't mind but by the 47th torrent it starts becoming annoying. It also happens to be (to the best of my knowledge) the only decent (ad)free fully featured torrent client on Android.

Bee-gly-bee-tea

baretorrent masterrace reporting in

enjoy your malware

LIII BitTorrent Client

codecpack.co/download/LIII-BitTorrent-Client.html
github.com/aliakseis/LIII

Attached: LIII.jpg (743x475, 46K)

qbittorrent

Did you know that qbittorrent has an integrated torrent search engine?
Many people don't know this, all you have to do is enable it on the menu.

Attached: search.png (281x252, 11K)

Then you can search on all sites at the same time.

Attached: search1.png (1920x1048, 138K)

Why is it eight fucking megabytes?

Attached: Capture.png (595x54, 3K)

Who cares about megabytes? The average computer has like 8GB of ram.

Torrenting is for commies

Needing 7.7MB of botnet is an issue.

>145MB up
STALLED

1,2,3,5 are only valid options, others are garbage. Between the valid options, it really depends on what you're using it on and if it's a desktop or server

Because it's 2019 and not fucking 2010 like your outdated torrent client

So what you're saying is people unlearned how to code.

You can add Pico torrent to the list.

Thank you user-chan

Test both under heavy rl conditions, ram & cpu and then report back, and lose sophistries.

Here's one for ya'. 1137 torrents, 23 actively seeding at 10Mbit. 37MB of that RAM is read cache.

Not going to download your 8MB of botnet to test. My guess it will use more RAM with zero torrents.

Attached: Capture.png (731x69, 6K)

Kek

I run deluge with multiple instances capped at 750. currently running 3000 torrents and its still going strong

Half-assed is not what i asked, and that's not how you test things, either you do it or you don't.

Burden of proof is on you. It's already known that no other client stacks up to uTorrent. If you think your new client beats it and, by extension, all others, prove it.

Just go with Transmission.

That's not how burden of proof works, you accepted to make a test but instead you made a lame attempt and guesses, you already proved to be an incompetent slob.

>It's already known that no other client stacks up to uTorrent

Attached: disappointed.png (420x420, 267K)

>please download my virus!
No.

I switched to aria2c for torrenting

Stop shilling ubotnet.

>don't suggest the best torrent client
Why not? Do you get paid every time someone downloads a worse one?

a text based torrent client is your favorite? Just how much of a pathetic incel faggot are you that you insist on old outdated software patterns just for the sake of looking l33t? fucking kill yourself you abombination. then download Tixati because its the best

You're suggesting utorrent though

Well yeah. There is only one best torrent client and that's it.

>what is rutorrent
>what is (any of the alternatives to that)
Well yeah but it's definitely not utorrent

>deluge is a torrent client
never trust torrenting advice from people who don't know the difference between deluged and deluge.

Use Winblows Sandbox 4head

I don't have Pro on this machine and I don't feel like spinning up one of the ones in the other room.

based and tixati-pilled

never heard of rtorrent, I like transmission for being bulletproof, but qbittorrent has sequential order download for when downloading anime/porn

uTorrent 2.2.1 can set sequential globally.

>deluge
>bloated
what?

How?

It actually is.

Not counting the write cache, uTorrent is using 70MB there to actively seed 23 torrents with another 1116 running.
Deluge is using only 30MB less and more CPU doing nothing at all.

Attached: Untitled.png (1823x521, 79K)

There's a thread on PTP about it. It's in a hidden menu.

In this guide I will discuss how to download torrent pieces sequentially.

What are the advantages? Say you have a download speed of 750 KB/s - that should be enough for you to watch a 720p movie streaming. If you have 200-250 kB/s download speed, you can watch the 480p streaming. Another advantage of this method over the 'streaming method of uTorrent player' is that - streaming method works only when your download speed is greater than the bitrate of the movie - if not the uTorrent player will keep closing itself. But you won't face this problem if you use this method (refer to the bonus tip at the end).

Requirements:
1) uTorrent client more recent than 2.2.1 to download pieces sequentially. I use uTorrent 2.2.1 build 25302 because it is very stable and it consumes less memory.
2) You also need a media player that can play partial MKV (like VLC player).

Steps:

1) Goto Options > Preferences in uTorrent
ptpimg.me/93kuu2.png

2) Select Advanced Tab and set the value of bt.prio_first_last_piece to be 'true'
ptpimg.me/i7r5q5.png

3) Set the value of bt.compact_allocation to be 'false'. In my uTorrent 2.2.1 this was 'false' by default.
ptpimg.me/g2f3eh.png

4) Press okay to save changes

5) Hold Ctrl+F2 [if this doesn't work use shift+F2]. Goto Options>Preferences without releasing Ctrl+F2 [if this doesn't work use shift+F2]. Release Ctrl+F2 after the preferences menu opens up. [if this doesn't work use shift+F2].

6) Set the value of bt.sequential_download and bt.sequential_files as 'true'. They are false by default.
ptpimg.me/pmnfrl.png

it's shift-F2, and you can just click the preferences icon.

Attached: Untitled.png (667x496, 19K)

>ITT: torrenting without seedbox
Enjoy your ISP cutting off your internet.

Not a problem if you live in a free country.

>stalled
>i/o error
>retrieving metadata

>sequential order download
Is your download speed so low that you can't wait for it to finish downloading? Sequential downloads hurt the torrent's health.

Attached: qbittorrent_2019-08-08_15-10-37.png (830x113, 14K)

At least the happy merchant is still rightfully there.

>Sequential downloads hurt the torrent's health.

Only if the torrent has less than 10 seeders and you don't seed it. It's really not anymore of a big deal than leechers in general.

Well meme'd my friend.

Attached: qbittorrent_2019-08-08_21-39-39.png (471x122, 12K)

So utorrent 2.2.1 isn't cool anymore?

if you want to use proprietary software at least use some good one, use utorrent 1.5 instead

Also it's like the only dark theme client on windows.

I updated qbittorrent and now it no longer opens torrents and instead Firefox ramps up to 100% cpu usage whenever I click a magnet link; I have a fucking OC'd 8700k.

Attached: 1556767040490.jpg (1080x967, 55K)

I thought that way just me, use a different torrent bro

Different torrent client or a different torrent file?

1.5 was awful, though.
1.6 was the "aaaaaah" moment. It was the point where everything just worked.
1.7 was a series of regressions
1.8 got us back to 1.6 performance
Then the version jumped to 2.0's which were all pretty much great.