$89

if you're going to get Intel anything on a budget, the i5-9400f is far superior. $130 for 6c6t.
>can only hold the advertised boost if you buy a good motherboard, defeating the purpose of being cheap

what? A $65 B365 motherboard can easily maintain stock boost.

Lmao, i didn't say that, and MOST of the intel lineup DOES have an iGPU, unlike AMD shit where if you want an iGPU it HAS to be a last gen CPU.

3200G is Zen+ not Zen2.

>muh games
Are you really that stupid?
You can get an AMD chip for the same price that has SMT, a cooler in the box, can be overclocked and an actual integrated GPU that can hold its own against $50-$60 discrete GPUs.
If you're a poorfag, but actual poorfag hardware. The 9100F is the retard's choice that comes out more expensive in the end at no noticeable performance gain in 99% of cases.

They have to put all the defective i9 dies somewhere

>4 cores/threads in 2019
That's a big yikes from me dawg. Even a sandy bridge xeon from 2011 is better than this shit.

lmao, no, no it's not.

A SB xeon from 2011 requires a stupid price used X58 board.

Not to mention, having fairly shit single core performance compared to a 9th gen.

Basically, the equivalent AMD has a whole bunch of shit that no one wants whereas the 9100F removed all the shit that no one needs (muh coarz, muh iGPU) and sells you only what you need for an absurdly low amount of money.

My brother is poor and has an i3 8100 and a gtx 970 and he is very happy doing 1080p 60hz on it

No it's not.

cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-i3-9100F-vs-Intel-Xeon-E3-1245/3461vs1202

>4 cores and 4 threads post 2017

Attached: 1564845313770.jpg (725x555, 221K)

Same for my brother, but the 8350k

And he has the 1660Ti which is a bit better than the GTX 970.

...

>4 cores
>4 threads
I admit I'm an Intel shill but even I have to draw the line somewhere

Attached: 1565805347942.gif (300x168, 791K)

if it's all about cost, you can get an R3-2200G for $60 new. Now what?

Stfu. eBay is riddled with fags selling their outdated crap. I got fed up with it and decided to just get a r5 - 3600 to replace my 4690k. I no longer get any stutter in BF1 and no more texture pop in in GTA V

4 locked threads. My 4690k @4.5 GHz bottleneckecked my RX 580 in any moderately demanding game made after 2014. 4 threads is now obsolete.

Attached: Screenshot_20190612-194232.png (1080x1920, 475K)

...

>free exclusive mystery gift
The next security bug?

Attached: debiru.png (224x314, 61K)

They wont see any more money from me.

I still remember when i was coerced into buying a fucking i3 3200 for 105€.

Fuck them

>I play two CPU demanding games. This means everybody needs an i9 9900k!

You can get a 200GE for $40.

>My 4690k @4.5 GHz bottleneckecked my RX 580 in any moderately demanding game made after 2014.

Can you give us an example?

Of course not.

if i was at a $100 id rather just get a 6 core 12 thread 2600 or something

yup I was just saying that this thread is about price for a 4c4t CPU. So the 2200G is 4c4t for cheap WITH an iGPU. The Athlon 200GE is great for its $40 tag.

As opposed to... Faildozer?

The 6 core ones w/ hyperthreading from 2012 are way better can be found dirt cheap on eBay.

I literally said in my post that I no longer get stutter in BF1 and 2016 game, and texture pop in+stutter in GTA V (2015, but really a 2013-4 game. Please retake 1st grade reading.

I didn't even mention the i9, just the $200 3600. It's a fact that 4 threads is no longer enough for games now.

Yes but good luck finding X58.

Oh, you're the same faggot who complains about stuttering with Intel in every thread.

The single core performance is still better on the 9100, by a solid 20%+

The e5-1650/60 has the advantage of the threads so for anything well threaded, yes it's better, but for gaming, it'd be a mixed bag, and the higher single core performance of the i3 would likely generally be superior to the xeon for most games out there.

Wish i had done that inatead of buying an fx 6300

I mean, you can probably get a cheap as fuck one from china, but i'm personally not super comfortable with chink boards like that.

And a that point, you might as well look at something more modern with chink-shit Xeon ES's or something.

My brother replaced his 6300 with an 8350k, he OC'd it to 5ghz all core and hasn't looked back.

Sure it's only 4c/4t, but it's enough for most games at 1080p, even UW 1080p.

>quadcore
>year of our lord 2019
LMAO. You can get a fucking Ryzen 1600 with 6 core 12 thread for that price on sales.

i was expecting good shit when intelturd keep recommending me this last year when I asked a good CPU for my friend.
My friend literally mad at me when He played Battlefield 1 and because his CPU keep trothling like shit.
Apparantley BF 1 was a CPU hogs specially in multiplayer, shit like reviews never used Multiplayer game when they benchmark shit.
His game was running at 100% CPU with 30% GPU usage with 9100F and Nvidia 1060
The game was running smooth as butter on my RYZEN 2600 CPU.

youtube.com/watch?v=TQHLd_XkNEo
This CPU already dead since 2 years ago.

Fuck this board and fuck intel shitter.
FUCK YOU OP!

less

Attached: 2019-08-14 17_06_22.png (258x415, 37K)

>office/surfing
amd apus(igpus and stock coolers)
>budget gaming
2600(6c12t)
The i3 serves no purpose.

Whatever, not everyone has and needs to blow like $500 on a new CPU just because and like a third of that on a new motherboard.

2600X is $140 at it's cheapest.

That's a whole $50 more than the i3, and has no iGPU as well, so that $50 with the i3 can go into a GPU budget.

Not to mention, Zen and Zen+ are much more heavily tied to RAM speed than Zen2 is. Since Zen2 you can boost the infinity fabric clock independent of the memory clock. So you likely need to buy more expensive RAM for the 2600x than you would for the i3.

>responding to cope posts

He probably gets nightmares thinking about how even a 2 core i3 beats his 2600 in 90% of games.

But what about security mitigations? Spectre and meltdown V1s LITERALLY slice SSD performance in half.

What if you enabled ALL 30+ security mitigations?

Attached: meltdown_crystal_disk_mark_6_4k_read_q32_t1_broadwell_xps13_corei5-100747467-large.jpg (700x421, 33K)

>3.2GHz

>2015 laptop cpu
shit b8

What's the mystery gift?

Get a 1600 then.
The 9100f simply can't handle modern games 4c4t is not an option unless you enjoy stuttering slideshows.

It doesn't though. The i3-9100Farenheit would be on par with an i3-8350K which is on par with a 2600.

It can easily do an OC to 3.8-4.0 GHz on the stock cooler depending on voltage.

Right which means performance regression has gotten WORSE as the IPC increments from broadwell to coffinlake required moar branch prediction hacks to boost IPC slightly.

Keep in kind this massive SSD performance degradation is only from V1 spectre and meltdown vulnerabilities

Attached: perfrel_1920_1080.png (500x1210, 65K)

I average 110 fps in BFV with a 7600 and a 1070 with DX12 disabled and future frame rendering off.

actually you're wrong

For that price you can get a 6/12 core R5 1600 lol

youtu.be/TQHLd_XkNEo
>0.1% low - 15fps
BF5 is literally unplayable. Even the 1600 completely obliterates the i3.

I'm really happy that your AMD shill video helps you cope but I never drop below 90 fps in BFV

Dude I totally trust you.

>youtube.com/watch?v=bBKHsMar1Jo
>this guy tested it with no background app open
>most of people in here got
>Browser open with multiple tabs like Jow Forums with auto update
>torrent running in the background
>or other stuff that never been used during a benchmark test run.
>Intel running at 98% top
I swear this place full of fucking idiots.

>BF1 is BFV

>So you likely need to buy more expensive RAM for the 2600x than you would for the i3.
My 2200g works with a $75 2x8gb kit at 3200cl16.

What is the best valued Intel cpu for a z270-a Board with 1070ti gpu guys?

my 2c4t i3-4130 still serves me incredibly well

It's not even actually 4.2ghz. It's 3.6ghz with (((turbo boost))) to 4.2. It's literally no better than an 8100.

A big black dildo so you can fuck yourself in the ass after you install it

>Cores
>4

lel corelet

Attached: bf5.jpg (1266x700, 120K)

>$5 AUD more than the Ryzen 3200G
>$20 AUD more than the Ryzen 2200G
>both of which come with integrated graphics
Unironically what point is there for this?
Cheaping out on a CPU temporarily to buy a higher end motherboard? That's the only thing I could think of, which still doesn't make a ton of sense.

imlplying new is better

>if you want an iGPU it HAS to be a last gen CPU
Ryzen 1 came out back in 2017, buddy.

$200 for a 5 year old cpu

Attached: 1496102431683.png (792x475, 375K)

Oh no no no no

I mean, considering they go for $200+ used, i still don't see how he got one for $90.

Huh?

3200G is Zen+, not Zen.

Current gen is Zen2.

I bought 4c/8t in 2013, fuck off retard.

Was the 46xx line really that shit? I play gta v on ultra with a laptop i7-8750H and it's smooth as fuck

to be fair, 8750h is a 6c/12t beast, it turbos to 3.9Ghz on all 6 cores, 4ghz on 4 cores, and 4.1ghz on 1 core.

4690k is only 4c/4t. Though at 4.5Ghz all core OC it should still be decent in most games.

And Ryzen 1 which also had iGPUs came out in 2017, as I told you.
You said that if you had an iGPU on an AMD CPU you had to buy the latest, which is incorrect.

...i said you COULDN'T buy the latest gen, because there is no Zen2 CPU with an iGPU.

It has to be last gen or earlier, because they don't make a current gen CPU with an iGPU.

Enjoy your cpu patches on that thing

Zen APUs came out a year after Zen CPUs, dumbass, and that was only one model, the 2200G, for three months. Two months after 2200G Zen+ came out.

>4c4t no IGP no cooler

What exactly is the target market for this? I'm honestly confused. Gamers really benefit from 4c8t these days. Productivity users need an IGP. Any user in that price bracket almost certainly is going to want a cooler thrown in.

I'm not even shitting on Intel here I just don't understand how this SKU makes any sense.

A cooler is trivial to acquire and just adding $10 to the cost of the CPU is no big deal. I assume the market for this is anyone who wants good single threaded performance and literally doesn't care about anything else.

Not sure I'd care about the lack of integrated GPU. I mean, I wouldn't for sure, but if I was buying that for someone else's computer then yeah, I could picture lots of normies needing setups where an AMD APU would just be better.

>It's the Far Cry faggot again

Enjoy your corelet in 2019

Attached: ACO_1080p.png (1374x1516, 71K)

>4 cores

Attached: 1565075459062.jpg (589x769, 72K)

Chink-shit referbs off of aliexpress, most likely.

>MUH COARZ!!!!!
Fucking degenerates, ffs! This board is doomed.

Remember when back in far cry 2 ubisoft selectively limited a bunch of gpus in a separate dll?

For $10 more (which you can cover by a cheaper motherboard) you can get an R3 3200G with vastly superior iGPU that can even handle some vidya and overclock potential.

Recently my x58 setup with a x5660 @ 4.4ghz with 24gb ram bacame unstable for some reason, rather than spending (up to) alot of time and effort trying to find the problem (since it likely just is the 9 years old mobo wearing out) I just switched to my back up rig..

A 1155 h61 with a xeon e3-1230 and 16gb ram.

I notice the differance in going from a hexa to a quad quite bad. Its fine when only gaming, only slight frame drop in comparison, but when I have other shit going on at the same time like recording game footage and just all the normal random stuff it is alot worse.

The r5 3600 seems perfect, how is the heat/noise of that thing? Did you get the new x570 chipset or a older cheaper board?

The only thing that concerns me is memory issues, I remember when ryzen came there were alot of compability issues, do you know if this is still a thing?

Attached: spcy.jpg (652x419, 71K)

It is still a thing - but instead of having to hunt a bit to find memory that works absolutely right, you now have to hunt a bit to find memory that doesn't work.

What makes it a better option than a 2200G/3200G?

BFV only uses more than 4 cores if you enable future frame rendering.

And if you don't enable the framerate is stuttery and inconsistent.

If you enable it you get input lag and the game becomes unplayable.

Opposite experience for me.

I'm truly sorry that you bought a ghetto ass CPU and are forced to play with that ghetto feature.