Lintards and repo slavery

Almost all Linux users are slaves to repositories meanwhile Windows users can download an .exe file and get the latest version, bleeding edge beta version, or an ancient version of whatever software then want if they have the .exe .

We literally have made habit of frequently changing OS's just to get software we find effective. Solutions have been offered such as distro agnostic pack managers like flatpak and snap, and tools like appimage. However they are primarily ignored in favor of ancient tools like apt-get and .deb.

In Debian/Ubuntu's case apt-get should continue to exist for people who want it and how it saves a lot of space. But developers should be encouraged to take advantage of flatpak and appimage and even tar.gz bundles to prevent software from being chained to particular distros

Attached: 1565701838611.gif (258x303, 3K)

Other urls found in this thread:

zdnet.com/article/inside-ubuntus-financials/
bugzilla.xfce.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&content=tearing&no_redirect=1&order=Importance&query_format=specific
answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/windows-10-keeps-installing-bloatware/d2c61be4-2add-4fea-9798-fcd4f4a1cf71
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>this thread again
You are too stupid to RTFM and set up a local repository with an archived set of all the packages + dependencies you’ll need.

yea, i think we covered everything that needed to be covered in the last thread, op

.appimage

10/10 bait

we told you;
- where to get dvd sets
- how to make a mirror
- how to make local repos
- why it is the way it is, and why it's not a bad thing
- that it's possible to run old programs if required

what the fuck else do you want?

Linux is free (meaning it costs nothing). Why do you expect a bunch of volunteers to work for free and produce competitive products?
Socialism doesn't work. Well, at least with state socialism some people would be forced to work, but here it's just a few bored neckbeards doing stuff when they feel like it.

I don't understand what the problem is with this board and not admitting the flaws with linux. I love it for my job(cybersecurity) but holy fucking shit, this shit sucks for home use, why is that so hard to admit? Are freetards so buttblastingly insecure as to just stick their heads in the sand and pretend there are no issues with muh gahnoo plus lintcocks?

Most annoyingly is pretending like linux is in any way more allowing of the user to modify the system. Package managers are literally retard proof Apple-tier coddling where they will literally refuse to let you uninstall something if it thinks it's dependency is more important than your sudo. It's very weird to me so see people state over and over again that it's so much better for the user than windows, but this shit is literally worse than just being admin on windows, atleast on windows you don't have to sudo for every single fucking thing. Why hasn't this been improved? Is it just autism?

that's a lie and you know it. ever since red hat incorporated, linux has become an industry. it makes money, it generates business, and businesses are built around it. while the product itself may be free to download, to pretend that it's only volunteers and hobbyists working on it isn't just a misrepresentation, it's a bald faced lie. So you're either deliberately overplaying the volunteer aspect of FOSS to compensate for the absolutely abysmal userspace, or you are just really that fucking retarded.

Fucking hell AGAIN. fuck off.

linux isn't worth a shit without internet. and nobody better bring up the fucking enterprise and supercomputer systems like they resemble home use whatsoever. everyone who enters this thread like this faggot lying saying they mirrored every single piece of software they could ever need and have it locally are absolutely full of shit, and would go back to windows like everyone else if repos didn't exist. appimage/flatpak/snap are okay as standalone band aids but don't measure up to simple executables.

seething lincucks that can't defend the software they worship. just admit it's not perfect, it's not that hard. you can still love linux without being a fucking faggot, but you guys just keep on doing it. Why? It's not like you're getting paid to do it?

you're the only angry one here OP

Attached: 4bf.png (625x626, 181K)

don't worry, linux apologists have excuses for everything.

the desktop experience is shit
>YEAH WELL IT'S A SERVER OS SO
so it should stay on servers
>NOOOOOOO THE KERNEL WAS MADE FOR DESKTOPS
well why don't the developers fix small dumb stuff that's clearly just bad planning?
>THEY DO IT FOR FREE SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP REEEEEEEEEEEE

it's a shit show honestly.

seems like you're projecting there m8, OP raises a good point that linux has failed to address throughout the years. there is no good solution to give him, this is just one of those areas linux falls short of being an actual, full fledged user experience.

The desktop experience isnt shit though, xfce and KDE and all the other are quite good actually

>screen tearing
>13 different fonts in your file explorer
yeah.......quite good...not. The closest linux has ever been to useable for normies is GNOME2 and they even managed to fuck that up, both with GNOME3 and everything MATE did to ruin a good thing

>that's a lie and you know it. ever since red hat incorporated, linux has become an industry. it makes money, it generates business, and businesses are built around it. while the product itself may be free to download, to pretend that it's only volunteers and hobbyists working on it isn't just a misrepresentation, it's a bald faced lie. So you're either deliberately overplaying the volunteer aspect of FOSS to compensate for the absolutely abysmal userspace, or you are just really that fucking retarded.

No, it's all true when talking about DESKTOP Linux distros.
There are not enough quality developers working full time fixing bugs and making desktop Linux competitive with Windows and MacOS.
The money and business for Linux is almost exclusively servers and some very limited workstation use cases.

you're full of shit. if you think the devs of any of the major distros don't get paid off their work, you're not just a liar, you don't even understand the concept of free software. free software does not mean you don't make money off the software, it means you don't sell the software. Do you change shirts often? Or does the cum mostly stay in your head if you don't tip it over too much?

Dude, Canonical is literally losing money with Ubuntu, and that's the most popular desktop distro.

ok

>I don't know what snap is
You're no longer allowed near crayons

are you always this shitty of a liar?

zdnet.com/article/inside-ubuntus-financials/

$6,200,000 in profit. inb4
>SIX MILLION ISN'T MUCH SHUT UP
more than your lard ass will ever see in your life

>installing spyware
no thanks, faggot

>6mil in profit
>less than 500 employees
Man fosstists really are delusional huh. Do you seriously believe that linux would be where it is if people weren't making money on it? I mean seriously, you can't possibly be that brainwashed. It's not free as in free beer

dude, you can literally google their financials, and they are not even close to losing money. even fucking manjaro makes money off their work and that distro sucks shit

I know this is bait but compton has been there for years and screen tearing is gone in the new version of XFCE

They were losing money until very recently. It's only after they dropped Unity, mobile and a bunch of devs that they recovered.

>gets called out for lying
>UH UH I MEANT BEFORE DOOD
jesus christ, this kind of cope is pathetic

compton sucks dick and is missing basic features, screen tearing still exists and the bug reports on xfce prove it

bugzilla.xfce.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&content=tearing&no_redirect=1&order=Importance&query_format=specific

way to not even know the software you're defending

6 mil is pathetic for tech industry

Damn, really called it with that inb4. Why are foss losers so predictable with their excuses

Linux is a kernel.

>freetards
Only a slave would insult a man for being free.

>if you criticize foss you're a slave!!!

Attached: 1565722159215.gif (432x498, 1.26M)

Linux is for retards, Windows is for literate users. There's even no two-panel file manager on linux, they believe caja is good enough. From editors there's vim and emacs autism that don't even proportional fonts. It's unbelievably dysfunctional nosoft.

also every rpm manager is incompatible with every other rpm manager.

Is that pic meant to be insulting towards Linux?
I fail to see why.

You did not criticize FOSS.
You criticized people who care about their freedom and are willing to make sacrifices for it.
That makes you a slave.

I know this is bait, but Emacs does have proportional fonts.

>choices = bad
Imagine not knowing you can install software from source, and that the repos are entirely optional.

>this thing is shit
>BUT ITS FREE SO ITS PERFECT FUCK YOU
>no its still pretty shitty
>FREE MEN MAKE SACRIFICES YOU'RE A SLAVE
i use and have been using linux for years now, but goddamn people like you and the community as a whole are just absolutely embarrassing. i know your 9th grade keyboard class teacher convinced you to base your entire personality around the idea that using free as in free beer software somehow makes you special, but you'll grow up eventually.

you're missing the point here dude. try re reading the OP, because you clearly didn't pay attention to what he was saying.

Every package manager has an option to remove something, ignoring dependency breakage, for pacman its -Rdd, for example

because for as much as linux users like to pretend that it's somehow completely different from windows or macos, it's the exact same shit. it is every bit as baby-proofed and anti-user-power as anything else.

this man knows. also add in that even windows explorer has a more functional file search than any linux alternative out there and it's obvious why nobody takes linux seriously for personal use. it's just not meant for it, any attempts to the contrary is just a hobby.

Remember when Jow Forums wasn't infested by wincucks? Me neither

>Windows users can download an .exe file and get the latest version, bleeding edge beta version, or an ancient version of whatever software then want if they have the .exe .

This is not a Windows feature, replace exe with binary and it still works. When is software ever "chained" to a particular distro? If you're capable of using a computer you can just install it from the source.

>pllleeeaaase computer can i pleeeeeaaaasse delete this, i know im already the super user and shouldn't have to ask but can i pleeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaasse remove this package?

>what is .deb

can't wait til summer is over and faggots like you don't post here anymore desu

Go back to /v/

Attached: you.png (226x223, 5K)

Imagine being such a huge faggot that you spend youre day fuming like this

>>what is .deb
Are you trying to install packages for Debian on other distros? That would be like getting upset that your .exe doesn't work on not Windows

Seething

>pllleeeaaase computer can i pleeeeeaaaasse delete this, i know im already the super user and shouldn't have to ask but can i pleeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaasse remove this package?
Now hold on a moment, do you want a good user experience, or not?
removing something that will result in breakage is not something you want to be doing everyday, this is only useful to fix very rare circular problems, if it did this by default, youd be right back here complaining about how package managers are broken and dont work

Who are you quoting

have sex.

strong counter argument. ever thought about getting certified as a retard? You'd have zero problems getting the papers.

Actually seething

>>pllleeeaaase computer can i pleeeeeaaaasse delete this, i know im already the super user and shouldn't have to ask but can i pleeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaasse remove this package?
answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/windows-10-keeps-installing-bloatware/d2c61be4-2add-4fea-9798-fcd4f4a1cf71

Attached: AEAEC069E8B34AA3A2A9A4D6277D678F.jpg (700x726, 37K)

>linux is good because it gives the user freedom
>macos doesn't and thats why it sucks
>except you have to ask special permission to modify your own computer, even though you already did by entering sudo
>but this is still somehow different than macos' """"""walled garden"""""

What the fuck are you writing? Fucking Pajeets are retarded

thank you for proving that linux is literally no better than windows. glad you're on my side.

I dont believe this post is sincere

>protecting user bad
>limited market good

>retard literally can't comprehend simple english
found the ubongo

>its only bad when apple does it!!!

No, you don't need to "ask for special permission" to delete anything in Linux, Microsoft actually tells you you can't.

Imagine being this person and not knowing how to make a proper sentence

you can literally delete any file you want at any time in windows. but of course you're not old enough to remember convincing retards to delete their system32 file

Your writing is nigger tier, simple english is for apes and pajeets

See

>le delet system32
Summer is almost done

When did i say linux is good compared to apple

not just one, but two retards that can't read.

>REEEEEE IF YOU KNOW COMMANDS YOU DELETE WHAT YOU WANT IN LINUX
>if you know commands you can stop bloat in windows
>THATS NOT THE SAME SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP

yup, and finally faggots like you will be gone, so actual adults can discuss software.

oh yeah bro lemme just search for your username real quick. go back to plebbit faggot

Delete yourself

>try to remove package that will break thing i've marked as important
>"hey buddy, this will break , you sure you know what youre doing?"
>yea m8, do et.
This is bad how?

on windows all you get is "no i dont like this, fuck off"

Your not an adult, keep coping rashid

You still haven't figured out why your writing is that of a nignog?

based

>go back to plebbit
You're acting like the redditor here, the spacing and mass replying are pathetic. Have sex.

sudo rm -R /your /life\

>delete
>are you sure?
>yup
>deleted
woooooaaaahhh broooooo woooaaaah crazy, that's way worse than a package manager just saying
>nope not gonna do it, fuck you i don't care if you're sudo

dilate

>Deleting file in Linux requires messing up dependencies
>Deleting file in Windows is just right clicking or going to the Control Panel
I wonder why no one uses Loonix

Linux is a kernel.

Put on a tripcode so I can filter you, or go to reddit. Fucking pathetic manchild

You can literally go to your software dependencies UI, how fucking stupid are you?

Imagine being this much of a pajeet shitter
Dont you have to work in your scam center?

and now we're back to the OPs point, something an endless army of fosstards have been doing everything in their power to avoid discussing. hilarious.

>WAHH LET ME FILTER YOU
you could not be more of a pussy, i never, ever meant this before, but seriously, go back to plebbit.

not as stupid as you apparently, defending such stupid design philospihy. for as much as you retards like to brag about muh unix philosophy, you all endlessly defend building systems like a fucking house of cards that have to handcuff the user or the entire system breaks.

>having to install a GUI just so you can know what all fucking software is leaning on each other
>this is a good thing

>muh unix philosophy
Only a relatively small proportion of GNU/Linux users actually care about that.

Just being root doesnt help when youve given the package manager conflicting tasks
This isnt a normal operation were taking about, but a task which contradicts something youve previously told it
When you say "thing is important, dont ever remove thing", then now go to remove other thing which happens to break thing, it not reasonable for the package managed to automatically remove thing, because you told it not to
so yes, its reasonable to need additional information to figure out the real intention of the user before doing this particular task

What fucking distro do you use that is not already there?

> nobody cares about unix philosophy
>but we're still better and different than windows and macos
gold medal in mental gymnastics

I dont use Linux

>uninstalling something isn't a normal task
you're kidding, right?

>unix and windows are the only two oses that have ever existed

Attached: 1563624330621.png (404x404, 118K)

only based post here. OP is sucking cock like usual.

Stop talking to yourself and go back

Read the reply chain, were talking about solving circular dependency issues, not regular package removals

This thread is a training ground for M$ shills LMAO.

you're seriously missing the point here. the fact that circular dependency chain is even a fucking term is proof enough that linux is garbo

Just format your computer bro

Reinstall your os
Use windows 8.1

thanks for adding to the discussion. really interesting and insightful.

Microsoft doesn't need to train shills when even frequent and long time users of linux get shouted down over every single stupid issue because people are literally just completely unable to admit ANYTHING is wrong with linux at ALL. just look at the thread, and see how many people actually have a legit rebuttal to the points that have been brought up.

I gave you a solution

no, you didn't, there hasn't been a single legit workaround for repo dependency or for the inane nanny-state of package managers. not a single person can refute that windows offers you more personal control over your system than linux.

This is always a result of human error, that is, telling the package manager to do two things that contradict each other
If you've run into this by accident, i have bad news for you...