Is it good?

hey everyone i just got this SSD (adata 256gb)
and working great at the moment.. however i've been surfing through the net and seen a few bad references about this model... most of them mention this model is very likely to fail in 6-8 months, if you have/had this ssd model how was your experience?
thanks!

Attached: unidad-de-estado-solido-ssd-adata-su800-256gb-25-m-D_NQ_NP_901426-MLM29038374477_122018-F.jpg (1000x1000, 145K)

>sata
>good
pick one.

It is good, don't let brand fanboys tell you otherwise

What's wrong with sata?

>6gb/s max

What if I don't need more than that? If I do, can't I RAID several SSDs together to get the speed I require?

I have the SU650 which is variable BOM and it's running fine.

why are you replying to a shitposter

Most sata ssda can't even break past 450MB that's not an issue until you get into good hardware and these are all m2 anyways

Because I too am a shitposter.

adata, the literal nigger of ssd's, enjoy drive death
it's nothing more than cheap ass chink shit bought by poorfags

simple. SAS was too expensive in 2014.
m.2 became relevant long before SAS become affordable enough to be viable for consumers.

I agree. The thing is however that SATA is still in large use. I am not aware of any interface or protocol used for spinning disks other then SATA. I believe it's unfair to say SATA is bad or irrelevant when there's no comparable replacement for it in this regard. I have not seen a spinning disk accessed over NVMe (yet).

>2019
>not having a NAS
ishygddt

I have it in my chinkpad daily driver, it works quite well and I haven't had issues. Been thrashing it VMs, movies, and general fuckery for the last 2 years and it's been fine.

ANYONE shilling sas is a hipster

it's the modern day OCZ

Attached: pic3.jpg (501x315, 78K)

Still works on my machine

>in 6-8 months
Doesn't ADATA usually have 3 years of warranty, which is 1 year product replacement and 2 years of service? Just give it back if it's broken.

I still use IDE to this day. It makes programming easier than just using text editor.

Adata is literally top tier flash memory

PCIE SSD's are about the same price as a sata based SSD, and you get a lot more bang for your buck.

anyone have experience with patriot burst?
i got one of these for $39 aud to use with an old macbook and its working good so far

Attached: 20-225-082-Z01.jpg (640x480, 20K)

Huh? I ran crystaldiskmark on a regular kingston 2.5" ssd and had like 600Mbps read speed and close to 500 write speedp

Well they're ok if you just use it as straight hdd swap. Hell I even use kingspec 64gb on an acer one netbook and it's still going strong

Honestly adata is the lowest that I'd go for my go to machine

Have this running on my system. Going strong so far.

How's WD Blue ssd? I'm thinking of getting one.

Budget SSDs have similar sequential read/write speeds to premium SSDs but drastically slower random read/write speeds, and they don't advertise this. I don't know if it really makes a big difference to the average user though. I was going to buy a Colorful 512gb SSD and asked this question in the PCBG and no one answered. Very very rude imho.

It's way better than chinkshit from aliexpress, and even better than kingston

I hope you don't use it on your regular machine. I used one on my family's optiplex and it's dead after 2 years

They're slightly worse than Kingston but you're not going to notice it for regular use. Still way better than whatever chink stuff you find on ebay

Adata makes good enough SSD but they don't have firmware level TRIM so don't expect much if you are gonna use it on an old OS

I hope you dont actually get trolled by these tards into thinking there is anything wrong

Vertex3 reporting in. Nearing 10 years of use. SMART reports mine has seen 50k+ hours of power on time and 3k+ power cycles. 97% estimated life left.

Attached: OCZ Vertex3.jpg (425x310, 15K)

openbsd btfo

Lets see a screenshot you lying POS

adata makes good shit, everyone's tlc nand is pretty good at this point so a controller will only really limit iops a bit.

the only problem I could see with longevity is if you are buying like cheap pre 2013 parts but idk where you would even find some of those (cheap for the time not cheap for right now).

yeah nvme storage has gone down in price lately while sata has stagnated but even on the cheapest end it is only as cheap as sata and that is on parts with a tiny cache that end up being as slow or slower than a quality sata ssd.

Yeah these 20 years old are retards. It's a decent SSD.

I bet they all buy nvme and then get dunked on after the first 20 gigs because their cache is full and now they are transferring at sub sata 3 speeds. Too cheap to only buy top tier pro nvme drives with master race mlc nand for unlimited write sizes.

wot
I thought it only slowed once all the memory but the cache was taken

it's fine then. however fs raid and hardware raid both pose their own unique problems

uses the phison controller which has killed many ssds before. phison controllers are complete ass and corrupts entire blocks. uses the same NAND as the ADATA SU650 but it does have DRAM which is good but don't buy ANYTHING phison it's complete garbage, especially used ones as they will have outdated firmware.

That explains the anti adata shills.

I've used mine for almost 3 years daily as my main tower for gaming/work and they still boot quick without any dead sectors.

it's fine.
this is fine.

been using it since almost a year. Working good.

Attached: Screenshot (11).png (1376x747, 112K)

very nice user. My Vertex 2 bit the dust after a month or two and likewise for its Vertex 3 replacement. IIRC they had big problems with the Sandforce controllers

Good point, anything that stores the FTL in NAND only and not on-drive DRAM (e.g. Crucial BX vs MC) is not worth buying

*BX vs MX