Based Google, Roasties BTFO

nypost.com/2019/08/17/how-google-has-destroyed-the-lives-of-revenge-porn-victims/

Attached: 7264110E-1876-4EC8-A2FD-51107B6A30BE.jpg (1320x1456, 991K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act
jewishcurrents.org/the-origins-and-meanings-of-ashkenazic-last-names/
youtube.com/watch?v=sVXnoanopzA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>At this point in time, nobody accepts a date, new hire, roommate or even college applicant without first doing a Google search.
Holy shit! Normies are creepy as fuck. I've been scared to google my real name ever since websites scared me into signing up with my real name when I was a wee lad.

>NOOOO GOOGLE WAS SUPPOSED TO WORK IN OUR FAVOUR

Attached: 1556851681259.jpg (1080x1020, 72K)

>gloss over why you can't sue a website which is hosting pornography of someone who never consented to its dissemination
That kind of seems like an important detail.

>So long as a website or Google did not post or create the material, even if it’s illegal, they can still post it on their site or search engine and even profit from it.

>So long as a website did not post the material, they can still post it

What kind of English is this?

I'll excuse her as she is a hot Jew lawyer

Attached: Screenshot_20190817_225334.jpg (1080x1595, 404K)

She can delete my revenge porn cache any day

Attached: vq-goldberg-use.png (1200x800, 1.36M)

Tell me more about Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

Attached: 20170628_MM.LAFLEUR_179-1024x1536.jpg (1024x1536, 203K)

>Goldberg

What are your thoughts on the Safe Harbour provisions of the Act, Goldberg?

Attached: 1566079173531.jpg (715x1515, 365K)

Women are the whole reason why we can't marry and sex little girls.

Jews and women are why the 1980s cp laws passed.

S