UEFI is so much better than that old clunky BIOS

UEFI is so much better than that old clunky BIOS.
F1 "Help" is actually helpful. And just look at it, all those colours, and you can use your mouse and click on the cool word-pictures and see how fast it goes.

Attached: bios2.jpg (1203x525, 141K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ami.com/ami_downloads/Aptio_TSE_Data_Sheet.pdf
fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot
fsfe.org/campaigns/generalpurposecomputing/secure-boot-analysis.en.html
hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/12/30/014226/free-software-foundation-campaigning-to-stop-uefi-secureboot
paritynews.com/software/item/530-the-free-software-foundation-campaigning-to-stop-uefi-secureboot
bytesmedia.co.uk/2012/07/17/richard-stallman-uefi/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

idk my UEFI is always laggy and weird and the mouse control doesn't work perfectly

What do you need a BIOS for? Do you have something to hide?

Dumb fuck. That's just Aptio with some shit skin. Absolutely niggerlicious that you actually need help in UEFI.

ami.com/ami_downloads/Aptio_TSE_Data_Sheet.pdf

I didn't say I need BIOS???
I said UEFI is better.

Attached: winbios.gif (620x340, 72K)

>cool word-pictures

Attached: 1544964633452.jpg (812x1024, 61K)

your IQ truly must be way below room temperature if you don't prefer left to right.
left is simply timeless

For a while I had a machine with U.E.F.I. firmware that simulated B.I.O.S. to boot anyway so I had a fancy firmware menu but could still boot from an m.b.r. scheme.

Now my latest board offers now legacy B.I.O.S. support which was fairly annoying to get working I have to say with that whole "U.E.F.I.-systems partition" thing.

I obviously like the fancy firmware configuration menu but if one not use the advantages of U.E.F.I. which I do not then the overcomplicated boot process is overcomplicated.

UEFI vs BIOS has nothing to do with its GUI, fa.m You could have this on both.

What are you hiding, pedo?

my CHILD PORN obviously

Better take that BIOS invested PC to the police and turn yourself in.

>click on the cool word-pictures
This is an 18+ website, Jose.

You realize that the interface has nothing to do with UEFI or BIOS? Both could literally be UEFI.

fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot
fsfe.org/campaigns/generalpurposecomputing/secure-boot-analysis.en.html
hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/12/30/014226/free-software-foundation-campaigning-to-stop-uefi-secureboot
paritynews.com/software/item/530-the-free-software-foundation-campaigning-to-stop-uefi-secureboot
bytesmedia.co.uk/2012/07/17/richard-stallman-uefi/

Despite all that BIOS is still more streamlined and easier to setup through partitioning... hmm

>overcomplicates boot process
Can't tell if trolling or ignorant. Just because you don't understand it does not mean it is complicated.

How?

Secure boot raises genuine concerns but you don't *have* to use it.

For something that I use only once when I install my OS, I don't care what it looks like, as long as it does the job.

It's not complicated, instead of having boot data just written to a specific location on the disk, you now have a partition to place boot file into

not yet. I don't doubt it will be pushed over as obligatory in a few years, maybe we won't even have the option to turn it off.

>uefi requires a fat32 efi stub
>bios can boot from a ext4 only drive

Hey guys what's going on in this thread?

Attached: graphical bios.jpg (500x375, 48K)

lol look at all those bloat

My childhood in a nutshell

>My childhood in a nutshell
lol childhood in a nutshell

Quack

Attached: DuckPad.png (800x590, 628K)

Another tech-illiterate nostalgia thread of memes

Not sure if this post is just bait, but I've had an easier time overclocking, setting up drive order, ram timings, and other stuff with my UEFI. I'm sure BIOS is still there for those who like it or need it, but the improved UI was the only logical way forward.

That menu has NOTHING to do with whether your computer uses a BIOS or an UEFI, you omega-brainlet.