What's preventing someone from forking the kernel project the commit before the CoC and then rebasing all of the changes made to the original project as patches are made?
What's preventing someone from forking the kernel project the commit before the CoC and then rebasing all of the...
Nothing. But what would be the point? The CoC is only relevant for developers, not end-users. And if your fork is just an up-to-date copy of the regular kernel, you won't have a dev community of your own. Why would anyone contribute to your no-name copy when they could work on the actual Linux kernel?
This is only sensible if you were going to make a fork with actual differing design/feature goals. You need to attract a dev team in order for anyone to actually benefig from the lack of CoC.
>Nothing
YOU GOT YOUR ANSWER. NOW FUCK OFF
more proof that CoC haters dont actually understand CoC or the linux community that employs a CoC, they are only transphobic.
The tranny is hiding it's face now it seems, too ugly to show the real thing.
kindly take your transphobia away and go somewhere else, Jow Forums is not here to serve as a sounding board for your antiquated ideals
if you have some quarrel with the direction of the linux dev. community id love to hear about it! otherwise go away troll
not funny
not an argument or criticism of technology
please refrain from further posting
thanks
Okay Tranny. Now suck my dick or else I'll bomb you
cringe
reddit go
???
Quick! Somebody needs to dial
coercion of sex or else imminent physical harm sure is hilarious, user. rolling my eyes over here. keep it up.
welcome
to
Jow Forums
im just a tech enthusiast who would like you to point to the linux tree where they fucked up, and need to take a new direction, instead of baselessly blaming transexuals as a whole because the community has inclusivity guidelines but im not holding my breath!
>The CoC is only relevant for developers
what exactly does a CoC do? get you shunned from developing further to the project? what if you singlehandedly patch a critical bug? they just wont merge it?
not funny
yep
How many megs of RAM, Carmine?
i dont feel its my job to entertain -- maybe see a stand up if you want jokes?
why dont you read the coc and see
His comment had nothing to do with trannies tho. Also trannies are disgusting and need to face reality.
not funny
which is proof that coc haters are only transphobic. unless...? no! i mean, unless...?
Trannies on a suicide watch
and we all know how effective that is these days
>What's preventing someone from forking the kernel project the commit before the CoC and then rebasing all of the changes made to the original project as patches are made?
Nothing
first funny post
Now shut the fuck up or I will rape ya
gross--please fuck off
Trolls trolling trolls
not funny
Not really seething but seething tranny ayy
didnt laugh
i would agree most standups probably would fail to make you laugh but if you find this funny
maybe you should get some louis ck tickets idk
penis
>What's preventing someone from forking the kernel sans the project faggotry/communism/mental-illness?
Nothing except the massive amount of proprietary binary blobs which may or may not have usable licensing.
>ITT: Jow Forumstards vs Jow Forumstards larping as trannies
not funny until penis
exactly
Nothing but now you have to maintain it.
The problem is that the CoC can influence what patches get accepted to the mainline, so at worst you'll just be a CoCless fork of the main project and at best you would have to work to bring in patches and developers who would be refused due to the CoC, but also maintain the high level of confidence the main project has for it to be worth the effort of running.
not enlightening
The top devs of Linux are being paid by The Linux Foundation, which is funded by donation from big silicon valley corporations. Other minor Linux devs are directly employed by those corporations. What you suggest is possible, but it will never happen as developers want to get paid.