Untitled
shut up goy
is another SHOA!
>techpowerup.com
why Jow Forumscunts have to publish here every useless article they find on google?
>Sir, have you seen this AMD boost clock drama? They're flailing, so I think we should just stay quiet for now and le-
>RELEASE THE SLIDES!
>B-But sir, that'll take attention away fro-
>RELEASE THEM! Now leave! You're distracting my child prostitute.
Intel needs to burn their management and marketing structures to the ground and start again.
Please delid dis
Stop being antisemitic
Hopefully Intel dies and takes x86 with it. Then we can get proper RISC machines again.
>Intel dies and takes x86 with it
x86 belongs to AMD and IBM, newfag.
It's on loan, moron.
It's Inturd who BUYS LICENSE FROM AMD to use x68, you INTBECILE.
Zoomer detected.
dilate
AMD and IBM INVENTED x86 and Intel's been buying ability to use it from AMD for fucking DECADES, you AUTIST. Same is with Hyper-Threading, which is a garbage implementation of SMT, which AMD is a creator of and holds license for too.
Epic le troll
Why do you think Inturd uses a thing called "x86-x64" kind of a half-assed architecture? That is EXACTLY because AMD has ACTUAL x64 and Intel LICENSES x86 to glue shit together so that it BARELY could do ANY x64 AT ALL.
>x68
x64
>x64
No such thing. x86 is x86, be it 16-bit, 32-bit, or 64-bit. Why call 64-bit x86 "x64" when you don't use x16 or x32 for the other respective integer values?
>x86 is x86
And AMD wholly owns it, because it invented it.
And same is for x64.
Intel, on the other hand, don't have x86 for jack shit and has to BUY the right to use it from AMD.
>bit
"x86" and "x64" doesn't stand for "bitness" of the architecture, you retard. These are not same things as "address space" of 64 bit OS or software.
There is no such thing as x64. Only pajeets like Microsoft use that retarded terminology.
>There is no such thing as x64
en.wikipedia.org
Yep, that is just 64-bit x86. Not "x64".
Read the article, INTBECILE.
>x64, also known as AMD64
x86 can be working with 64 bit software without being x86-64, kid. the "-64" stands for other things, not for bits.
I already explained that. Winjeets say x64. But that doesn't mean it isn't retarded.
>x86-64 is the 64-bit version of the x86 instruction set.
en.wikipedia.org
>"We'll d-definitely fix that! F-F-Five gigahurtz incoming!!!"
Do AMDrones really believe these things?