I don't feel so good

there is no non-buzzword sense of "social justice WARRIOR"

so where's the video of his talk

show me the video plz

I believe theres a video of him shitting on a vegan asking a stupid question. Not sjw

>Why is the world so fucked up
Cunny love was legal until Jews and feminists worked together 100 years ago to move aoc from 9 to 18. He just disagrees with dehumanization and chastising of humanity. It's not him that's fucked up it's laws and governments.

this pic needs to be pinned on its own thread below the sticky

>advocates for open governing
>advocates for anonymity and privacy
He's literally the opposite of a commie. Copyright is closer to communism than copyleft ever will be.

this

You know the left has gone too far when rms sounds completely rational in comparison.

he is a leftie though

Attached: mkaj09pcauv11.jpg (572x714, 34K)

Nani?

It's a fetish you weirdo, marriages to 10 year olds was because of royals being desperate to marry daughters off ASAP to form alliances. It still wasn't desirable to princes of the time, they also didn't want to marry a 10 year old but nevertheless were forced to. So take your "but its natural to be sexually attracted to kids who haven't even started to mature sexually, look at the old laws!!!!" Argument to Eightchan you nonce.

Attached: 1362748511190.gif (350x258, 1.55M)

>it's a fetish
It's more natural to be attracted to a 10 year old girl of your own race than it is to be attracted to a different race or same gender.
Also, 13+ is already not a child so it should be legal. Claiming otherwise is falling for the population control propaganda.

Who'd have thought a kjike would support microfdoft

No it isn't, humans are supposed to be attracted to either broad shoulders or wide hips. Paedophiles find these things unattractive. Also a 13 year old doesn't have the experience or the knowledge about the subject to give informed consent to sex, some 30-something year old sex maniac being legally allowed to exploit this and teach them what is "normal" about sex is just a really bad idea. Kids are protected by age of consent laws so they can introduce themselves to sex at a pace appropriate for their age and with others of a similar level of knowledge. That's natural.

fake, i don't see any indians

he supports a communist

Attached: 1567019498349.png (988x900, 100K)

>Sanders is a communist
Top lel, Americans really believe this.

*snap*

Fun fact: there are no communists in the year 2019.

it's still legal for gypsies

and?

fun fact: you're wrong

>a 13 year old doesn't have the experience or the knowledge about the subject to give informed consent to sex
Neither do some 18+ people. So what? It's a shit argument.
>age of consent
>That's natural
No it isn't.

>Pedophile
>And racist
Are trying to be the shittiest, most detestable person possible? Because it's working.

Bro it is natural, no one wants a fucking 30 year old fucking in a middle school that’s insane. When you say that “some” 18+ people don’t have knowledge, you are talking about an extremely small amount of people. On the other hand, almost every single 13 year old lacks the knowledge required. That is user’s point, and it isn’t a “shit” argument. Also, saying “no” isn’t an argument.

Not him; pedo shit is fucked up, but racism is backed by statistics so it actually makes sense.

Jow Forums on suicide watch?

Okay you get some incels past 18 who are still practising with a sock and the only women they know are their mum and their favourite porn stars. But 13 year olds universally don't know what they are comfortable with sexually yet.

Besides if you legalise an age of consent at 13 now, you'll have a mass of perverts now rushing at the formerly forbidden fruit. You'll get paedophiles rushing straight past the few early bloomers and straight for the physically less developed teenagers you still find plentifully at 13.

Children are easily influenced and manipulated by people, because of their ignorance and naturally trusting everyone.
Why do you think it's so easy to kidnap children?
If you play it nice and good, they won't even struggle all the way to abandoned building you were preparing.
And, it's really easy to trick them into having sex with you. Just pretend it's a game.

Why? He literally is the human equivalent of a tape recorder. If you've seen him talk once, you've seen it all.

youtube.com/watch?v=INCSBwpJBQk

Lol most females of 18 years old aren't even aware of the wall. If women know their value in the sexual marketplace they wouldn't be having sex with 90 guys around the world.

Oh fuck off, sex isn't a game of conquest. It just seems that valuable to you because you're not getting it.

>almost every single 13 year old lacks the knowledge required.
Were you ever 13?

13 year olds already have consensual sex and live normal lives later.

>Children are easily influenced and manipulated by people, because of their ignorance
Most people are easily influenced because they always trust the authority and media. Might as well forbid all journalism no matter how shit or good it is.
>they trust everyone
This is false. Most kids are shy towards anyone who isn't their relative.
>Why do you think it's so easy to kidnap children?
Because they're small and can't defend themselves.
>it's really easy to trick them into having sex with you. Just pretend it's a game.
We're not talking about pre-schoolers. All 13+ people already know what sex is and I guarantee that most 10 year olds do as well. You can't trick them into sex, they're fully aware what's happening. The only exception are kids whose parents are insanely overprotective and only if they had friends the same as them and no internet access.

Source in your retarded claims?
Unless you'll admit you're pedophile and speak out of experience, none of this bullshit means anything.
Hang yourself, childless faggot.

>vote green in australia

yikes

>13 year olds already have consensual sex and live normal lives later.
Not with adults

Yeah I’m not saying they don’t know what sex technically is, I’m saying they lack the knowledge to make the decision to have sex with or enter into an actual relationship with someone twice their age. Kids fucking around is different. Simply; there exist a microscopic number of 13 year olds, if any, who are mature enough to make such a decision.

based and yikespilled

Consensual sex with other teens who are equally clueless, not people who have long since figured out they like peeing on people.

>Source
Anyone who was a normal kid would know this.

Maturity is a meme. Most adults act immature all the time, they're just better at pretending.

>appropriate for their age
>level of knowledge
that's the thing, those do not line up in humans. animals mate the second they reach puberty.

>if you legalise an age of consent at 13 now, you'll have a mass of perverts now rushing at the formerly forbidden fruit.
And they'd be jailed because rape is always a crime. So what's the problem here other than your societal chastity fetish?

Ah... You're talking from your childhood experience... I see...
Well, you know, not everyone had uncle who touches your private parts when you were a kid.
A literal cumbrain. Being such degenerate, that you're defending having sex with underage children.
Boy, oh, boy, that Uncle fucked you up.

But it wouldn't be rape, they'd be able impress "consent" out of them by buying them an iPhone and telling how adult and grown up they are and that yeah their mom is a whack ass ho.

Cry more, cuck.
>having sex with underage children
If you're 13 you're no longer underage.

>somebody calling your mom a whack ass ho makes you want to have sex with them
how delusional are you

>If you're 13 you're no longer underage.
Who told you that? Your uncle?

13 year olds usually are when their parents ground them. That's a good point actually, you want the right to be able to fuck someone who could also be grounded by their parents still.

Then you as a parent should teach your kid about sex and criminals instead of crying about it to the government, enforcing a police state and supporting shit parents. You've failed as a parent if your kid is a gullible idiot and has no idea what sex is outside of sex jokes they see on TV/PC in front of which you leave them all day. You may feel better living in a world with laws against human rights, but you really shouldn't.

Parents already do that though, and it's already backed up by the law. But kids are stupid and do shit that's both against their parents wishes and against the law, why should one of those things now be made illegal? Just so you don't go to jail for taking advantage of a "failure in parenting"? Your comment comes across like fucking a 13 year old by grooming them with shit their parents wouldn't buy them, would be a punishment against the parents for being bad parents. The victim here is supposed to be the manipulated teen.

Made legal*

what a shitty thread

"Grooming" is as much of a crime as false/accurate advertising and propaganda are.

>Also a 13 year old doesn't have the experience
How do they get the experience though?

Attached: 1*UDUtGU1NqByb_yZmnhNTPw.png (624x534, 208K)

With other 13 year olds, obviously you tard. Not full on sex mind you, just the heavy petting that eventually escalates around about when one of them are able to borrow a parent's car.

They should get the experience with me.

So you can exert all your porn inspired fantasies on them? No one but you wants that.

I don't have any porn inspired fantasies.
I want to cuddle

you're retarded
what americans think is communism, aka neolibs is very far from communism. they are far-right on the economic scale if anything, generic globalist scum. this is why i hate american politics, you guys just jerk off to two different flavored right wing parties

>say it's too hot in the room
>suggests to open Windows
based

Attached: Stallman is a miracle of this universe.jpg (620x413, 120K)

>communism
>no free speech or else you're executed
>corporatism/copyright
>no free speech or else you're financially executed
If you can't freely share/sell/modify/reverse engineer information or property that's given/sold to you, then you're not in a truly free society. At the end of the day it doesn't fucking matter if it's a dictator's party or a company with the help of the nanny state that's enslaving people and denying basic human rights. It's inhuman, unnatural, disgusting and degenerate to prevent freedom of information/speech and whoever thinks abolishing copyright laws is wrong is an idiot. Might as well accept thought crimes as legitimate.

Attached: CIA-nig-trapcard.png (370x547, 316K)

by-the-book communism ends in anarchism, you seem to be confusing it with stalinism

>muh flavours of communism
Ok. By the book communism ends in a destroyed society just like any communism.

>communism means what i think it means and not what you think it means

why are you still having these retarded discussions on the internet

He got paid for it by Microsoft. I don't see the problem. It's just a lecture.

>get paid by microsoft to tell their employees their products suck
based

>get paid by microsoft to speak about the dangers of non free software to microsoft
What timeline is this?

Attached: 1532700332786.jpg (470x470, 31K)

dilate

seething redditor

Unironically, completely sincerely, please kill yourself

But I already have a file called "endtimes.jpg".

What the fuck happened in this thread, mods might as well nuke it desu even if you delete that retard's posts the entire thread has now been derailed.

>What the fuck happened in this thread
Jow Forums happened, as usual.