Why is Gimp so shit?

Why is Gimp so shit?

Blender succeeded on open source, why hasn't Gimp?

Attached: gimp-logo 1.png (1700x800, 306K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gimp.org/donating/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprinting_(psychology)#Baby_duck_syndrome
bokardo.com/principles-of-user-interface-design/
youtube.com/watch?v=qJEWOTZnFeg
gimp.org/docs/userfaq.html#i-dont-like-gimps-user-interface-why-cant-you-just-copy-adobe-photoshop
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

i've been using gimp for 6 years, never really had any problems with it and i prefer gimp over photoshop

gimp.org/donating/

Le problematic name / foot faggotry

ok so you "prefer" having to comb through the layer properties to manually add an alpha channel to your layers to get them to have basic transparency, which doesn't even always work, requiring you to save your progress and restart the program?

you "prefer" having a floating font properties window blocking your view, that you can never get rid of, that doesn't even accurately reflect what it's doing, but will still override any changes you make to the text tool settings while it's up?

this post could be longer but I'm just going to list the two things that came up the last time I tried to make a simple fucking comic edit in gimp.

you are shit if you are too dumb to use gimp

Sure sure, all the professionals who are far better artists than you and all use photoshop are just dumb.

I suppose that there are a lot of annoying things to anyone that has used any other program, but I somehow learned gimp before photoshop and now its my main editor of choice, its just way more comfortable to me since i've been using it for so long.

based retard poster

Because it's shit? It's a poorly-coded cluster-fuck full of errors that are never fixed and features that make no sense.

There's no secret it's just a bad program that has aged poorly. There are plenty of good open-source image programs out there, GIMP isn't one of them.