Arch vs Gentoo

What are the differences in between these two distros?

Attached: 308c76b.png (627x627, 336K)

Gentoo: you compile most programs yourself
Arch: you don't, except maybe some AUR packages

Just install Ubuntu and don't waste your and everyone else's time

>intentionally wasting your own time

What about Manjaro then?

Arch is faster to install, doesn't have all these customization things you don't use anyway and has both an official package repos with rolling updates (as opposed to Gentoo's packages that are late by several years) and a huge community-driven package manager. Used Gentoo for 3 years, don't miss it.

arch makes your choices for you, while gentoo leaves them up to you

You meant to say "while gentoo leaves you with the illusion of choice"

Gentoo is like Debian but focused on customization. It just werks if you're not retarded
Arch is made by and for stupid teens so it breaks all the time and has lots of half baked shit for a lot of things that just werk on any other distro.

Attached: Arch is garbage.png (1272x1377, 274K)

no

debian is trash, please don't compare it to gentoo
they're utterly different in most ways aside from the fact that they both offer stability
arch is miles better than debian in almost every aspect
its release model mostly just makes it unfit for enterprise use cases
>Arch is made by and for stupid teens
your post reads like it was made by a dumb teen 2bqh desu fampai
>it breaks all the time
no, it doesn't, stop spreading fud
>has lots of half baked shit for a lot of things that just werk on any other distro
what besides selinux
don't get me wrong, i don't use or care about arch
it sucks ass, but not for the bullshit reasons you stated
if you're gonna shit on it, try coming up with some valid criticism
if you can't do that as a gentoo user, well then that's truly sad
>Arch is garbage.png
that whole post is garbage and whoever wrote it should kill himself

pacman vs portage. Both are far superior to apt/rpm, but portage is the better of the two by a wide margin.

Arch for people who can't install Arch.

>Debian is trash
Funny how most companies and about 80% of cloud servers use it while everyone and their mother is abandoning gentoo.

pacman is faster than apt but it's nowhere near as versatile or powerful. Stop making arch users look bad by saying stupid shit

pretty sure most enterprises use rhel or suse
>everyone and their mother is abandoning gentoo.
more like everyone is abandoning debian
the only thing keeping it alive at this point is canonical

please tell me how it's apt is more versatile or powerful than anything

This isn't 2005 anymore user, companies have largely migrated to RHEL/CentOS or just Ubuntu. Things don't break half as much nowadays, so you don't need a distro where the latest package is from last year.
t. Running fedora on a homeserver after trying a few "stable" distros

>gentoo
>not chad nix

never gonna make it.

apt supports glob based patterns.

Nothing. They both offer nonfree programs.

Enjoy reinstalling every 6 months. Some "server"! Sad!

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-09-08 20-37-01.png (920x711, 101K)

Nothing.
There's no difference at all.
They are both one an the same.

Arch lets you opt-in to compiling what you want yourself, and automates that with the AUR.
Gentoo requires everything be compiled, so you need a backup machine for 2-3 days while you build and compile everything you'll need/want.

Linus doesn't use either of them

jeez louise my eyes, do you mind?

Arch and Gentoo serve totally different purposes. Jow Forums only thinks they are similar because they are both installed from the command line.

retard
they are literally the same os

>Gentoo
You fell for the memes.
>Arch
You are the meme.