What is a better way to accomplish this?

Actually switch cases get compiled to a map of case values to predicates.
Technically the lookup would be O(1) but then there's added function call overhead.

I should clarify that this is a c# feature which is what the image is.

fUCK

You forgot tralse.

what do you think a "map" is? For 64 cases, a hash array doesn't make any sense. Binary search in for a sorted list is going to be compiled as ifs with a maximum depth of 6

You're glowing CIA nigger. The CIA wants you to THINK it's an if ladder, actually it's a lookup table.

>hash array doesn't make any sense
But that's what happens
Take it up with Microsoft

bool setToOtherBool(const bool &b)
{
return b;
}

Not equivalent.

The OP uses else if, not else.

Therefore if x is neither true nor false then y will not be assigned.

any source? I don't believe clr to be that primitive.

if (x)||not(x) {
x = y
}

Just run that code snippet throw ildasm. Sorry I would do it myself but I'm phoneposting

Type was never mentioned so it's fair to assume bool rather than tralse.

Attached: j45kd8usp5801.jpg (834x1196, 84K)

Yeah. Easy: Don't use JavaScript.

Did you just assume the type of that variable? Two weeks sensibly training will hopefully set you straight.

Screw your sensitivity training, I only accept type-safe-pure languages. Type mixing was a mistake!

tralse

>tfw no three value boolean in my shitlang

Hope this helps
//Copyright 2019 user

//Sets x as true
var x = true;
var y = setYTrueBasedOnX(x);

console.log(y);

function setYTrueBasedOnX(x){
//This function returns a value based on the passed variable.
//It only works if the passed value is true or false.
//This is an if statement.
if(x){
//This returns true.
return true;
}
//This is the second part of the if statement. It will only execute when if the first part didn't match.
else If(!x){
//This returns false.
return false;
}
//This is the end of the IF statement
}
//This is the end of the function